What's new

India's first homegrown aircraft carrier set for 'launch'!

Scorpion666

BANNED
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
162
Reaction score
2
Country
India
Location
India
NEW DELHI: India's first indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC), being built at the Cochin Shipyard, will finally "be launched into water" next month. But don't be in a hurry to pop the bubbly. The already long-delayed 40,000-tonne warship will not become operational anytime before 2018.

The IAC - to be christened INS Vikrant after the country's first carrier acquired from the UK in 1961 and later retired in 1997 - will be "launched with a weight of 20,000-tonne" at a ceremony to be chaired by defence minister A K Antony in Kochi on August 12.

"The launch signifies the underwater work and fitting of machinery in the warship is over. Now, the superstructure, the upper decks and the out-fittings will be done,'' said an official.

"We hope the IAC will be ready for trials from 2016 onwards. The trials will take well over one year since this is the first time the country is building an aircraft carrier,'' he added.

The 260-metre-long IAC, with a crew of 160 officers and 1,400 sailors, is supposed to carry 12 MiG-29Ks, eight Tejas Light Combat Aircraft and 10 anti-submarine and reconnaissance helicopters on its 2.5-acre flight deck and hangars. Powered by four American LM2500 gas turbines, the IAC will have an endurance of around 7,500 nautical miles at a speed of 18 knots.

But the huge delays in both the IAC project as well as the 44,570-tonne INS Vikramaditya - or the Admiral Gorshkov carrier that just began its sea trials after a $2.33 billion refit in Russia - has derailed the Navy's long-standing aim to operate two full-fledged carrier battle groups (CBGs).

INS Vikramaditya will now be ready only by end-2013 instead of the original induction schedule of August, 2008. The IAC, in turn, was first sanctioned in 2003. But its keel was laid only in February 2009, with the ''launch'' date then being fixed for October, 2010. The huge time and cost overruns in the IAC project has also meant that the plan for a 65,000-tonne IAC-II remains merely on the drawing board at present.

Consequently, the Navy will be forced to operate its solitary and ageing carrier, the 28,000-tonne INS Viraat, till at least 2016. Currently undergoing yet another life-extension refit, the 54-year-old INS Viraat is left with just 11 Sea Harrier jump-jets to operate from its deck. The 45 MiG-29K naval fighters, being procured from Russia for over $2 billion, can operate only from Vikramaditya and IAC.

This when CBGs, capable of travelling 600 nautical miles a day with accompanying destroyers, frigates, submarines, tankers, fighters and other aircraft, are considered very effective at projecting offensive power as well as taking the battle to the enemy.

The US, incidentally, has as many as 11 CBGs - with each carrier being over 94,000-tonne and capable of carrying 80-90 fighters - prowling the high seas around the globe. China, too, is pursuing an active carrier building programme after inducting its first carrier, the 65,000-tonne Liaoning, last September.
 
.
aaaaany pics about the so called carrier?
 
.
Guys, quit it. Whether or not this can be considered truly indigenous is a rather moot point. They've made a aircraft carrier in India, and are going to launch it soon, that's a big achievement. Congrats to India.
 
.
wht china has done.............brought a junk aircraft carrier and painted it

We bought a scrapped carrier with all it's components removed, and built all the components by ourselves and made it into an operational carrier.

India just asked Russia to transfer its old carriers to India after Russian experts did all the work and transported it to India. Sorry but calling that 'indigenous' is beyond shameful. What is indigenous about it? Can India make ANY components of a carrier all by themselves without ANY foreign supplies or expertise? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Be mature about it please instead acting like rabid jingoistic clowns.
 
. . .
Firstly congratulations to our Indian friends。

Secondly the IAC is still nothing but an empty shell。

Thirdly all the major systems and sub-systems,and a huge chunk of the ship body itself,including the steel,are of foreign origin。

Finally,let me say this on the record:the IAC won't see induction before 2020。
 
.
For shivalik class

To overcome the steel supply problems, the required AB-grade steel was indigenously developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Steel Authority of India.

Shivalik Class Frigates - Naval Technology

Now for Idiots Who think India cannot manufacture a 40,000 tonne carrier

Rani Padmini 75,000 DWT-1981 by Cochin shipyard

5144341098_29da3bf583_z.jpg


Motilal nehru 86,000 DWT 1986

071_001.jpg
 
.
Firstly congratulations to our Indian friends。

Secondly the IAC is still nothing but an empty shell。

Thirdly all the major systems and sub-systems,and a huge chunk of the ship body itself,including the steel,are of foreign origin。

Finally,let me say this on the record:the IAC won't see induction before 2020。

Steel was made by Tata in India.
 
. .
Why always the Chinese Internet warriors always downplay Indian achievements? Thank God, The Ordinary Chinese were NOT like these people!

We will congratulate you guys if this was a legit indigenous carrier. But let's face it dude, there is nothing 'indigenous' about this carrier. None of the components are Indian, it's all made from foreign imports. India can barely make ANY weapon fully indigenous and you expect everyone to believe that you can make full aircraft carriers with indigenous components?

Lets behave like adults and be mature about this. I am happy India got an aircraft carrier, but lets not stretch it saying this is indigenous, because its far from it.
 
.
Congrats on the development. However 2018 for induction is highly optimistic IMHO, 2020-2022 is a more realistic timeframe, just 4 years difference not that long, good going well done. India is far better in naval developments then land based an aircraft dev work, though they still over promise and under deliver, a traditional SA trait.

For all those jingoistic ##### on both sides, just grow up. We all know China is way ahead of India industrially, it is one of the largest producers and exporters of marine vessels in the world, they are now challenging USA in many areas and will do so more in the future.

This does not distract from what India has managed to do, building a carrier even if all the pieces are from overseas is no easy matter, in fact project management of this scale is the most difficult part.

As for all those people talking uninformed crap about copying, indian industry does just as much if not more.
 
. . .
Sorry, this is blatant misinformation, and you know it. The hull of the carrier was purchased from the Ukraine in 1998 for $20m it was just that a rusting hull. HOWEVER the Turkish government refused to let it sail through its territory until November 2001 and the hull was finally towed to china around early to mid 2002.

The Chinese had no experience with carriers and CBGs considering all this what they managed to do is damned impressive. They literally had to build a new carrier from the inside out, it actually would have been easier to build new. You can see how difficult this is when you look at how long it is taking Russia to do a similar job on the indian carrier (even with all the blueprints etc).

Anyone who has done much project management will testify just how difficult it is to build on someone else's work, sometime much more easier to start from the beginning.

The difference being Russia will deliver a Combat Ready Aircraft Carrier which has been tested and proven, with all its defensive and Offensive capabilities in battle ready condition.

China has built a show peice AC that is good only for intenal consumption. For the rest of the world it is a dummy practice ship that will provide them with useful exposure and experience to build and operate A REAL AC in the future.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom