What's new

India’s economy in shambles, headed for a double-digit decline

Then why doesn't your effing constitution SAY the cow is sacred.It doesn't.
The restriction Art 48 ( milch and draft only) is in the "Animal Husbandry and Agriculture " which is intended to protect milch and draft cattle.
It leaves out buffaloes, mithuns, camels and Yaks. Which by the way the Nepalese being devout Hindus themselves slaughter by the thousands.
Next Question:
Are only Indian cows sacred?
Why doesn't India fight for the rights of cows globally?
Why are cows slaughtered in Goa, an RSS run state?
You do not have the mental faculties to understand how the article came about.


During the framing of the Constitution, the subject of cow slaughter was one of the most fraught and contentious topics of debate. Seth Govind Das, a member of the Constituent Assembly, framed it as a “civilisational [problem] from the time of Lord Krishna”, and called for the prohibition of cow slaughter to be made part of the Constitution’s chapter on fundamental rights, on a par with the prohibition of untouchability. In this, he was supported by other members of the Constituent Assembly, such as Shibban Lal Saksena, Thakur Das Bhargava, Ramnarayan Singh, Ram Sahai, Raghu Vira, R.V. Dhulekar and Chaudhari Ranbir Singh. Proponents of a cow slaughter ban advanced a mix of cultural and economic arguments, invoking the “sentiments of thirty crores of population” on the one hand, and the indispensability of cattle in an agrarian economy on the other.

There was one small, snag, however: fundamental rights were meant to inhere in human beings, not animals. After much debate, the Constitution’s Drafting Committee agreed upon a compromise: prohibition of cow slaughter would find a place in the Constitution, but not as an enforceable fundamental right. It would be included as a “Directive Principle of State Policy”, which was meant to guide the state in policymaking, but could not be enforced in any court. Furthermore, in its final form, this Directive Principle (Article 48 of the Constitution) carefully excluded the question of religious sentiments. Nor did it require the state to ban cow slaughter outright. Instead, under the heading “Organisation of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry”, Article 48 says the state shall “organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter, of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle

Now so you see the specific cows reference. Now don't go questioning the judgement of our constitution makers. You are not even worth a speck on their boot.
 
. . .
Glad you are not here we dont need you in India , hopefully you will enjoy your steak and yes my country my rules , if Kiren Rejiju has broken the law of land he will face the law.

Dont worry about India and Please never ever return back Mr. Jihadi . I dont think even Pakistan welcome Indian Muslims they consider them backstabbers , so better go where you find peace

We are more then Ok with one less Jihadi

Your country? Thankfully that hell hole is not where I live.
If its "your country" then send Nagaland, Kerala, Mizoram, Meghalaya, West Bengal, Goa, out of India as well. You usually send "them" to Pakistan right?
But they just love beef steaks. If you wish I can post the meat market videos here for you ,

Also throw out your state home minister Kiren Rijiju who declared he loved beef . Also throw out Raj Nath Singh as Home Minister who while campaigning in Nagaland declared " No restrictions on food " ( Nagaland subsequently banned dog meat but retained all other types of meat).
States like Telengana and Bihar have "fit for slaughter laws" as have Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry.
There is a satisfaction in seeing the number of "twice born" working at Burger King and I love my pork chops and bacon on my BLT sandwiches.
But you better hurry because you are late for your latest lynching.
 
Last edited:
.
Lol. So you are reinforcing my point. You even started the thread. So we deserve to laugh at you for such threads, is that it?
lol, liars are happy with their lies, Indians are Indians, no problem, enjoy your lies, one day the hard fact will hit you.
 
. .
Umhh its more like the other way around, you pathetic loads are human biggest losers so you have to vent on the internet. I have watch you pathetic pests going around like roaches trying to make your modaland looks great when the fact remains its a cesspool. Perhaps time to get out of the internet and start working to improve your ugly country eh?
So what are you, a Chinese? of course Bot, go earn your 50 cents. I am generous.
 
.
lol, liars are happy with their lies, Indians are Indians, no problem, enjoy your lies, one day the hard fact will hit you.
Please don't warn me. I am already get such warnings from globaltimes (or the gobartimes we call it here).
 
. .
Please don't warn me. I am already get such warnings from globaltimes (or the gobartimes we call it here).
haha, enjoy your crash

_20200923105316-png.672520
 
.
You do not have the mental faculties to understand how the article came about.


During the framing of the Constitution, the subject of cow slaughter was one of the most fraught and contentious topics of debate. Seth Govind Das, a member of the Constituent Assembly, framed it as a “civilisational [problem] from the time of Lord Krishna”, and called for the prohibition of cow slaughter to be made part of the Constitution’s chapter on fundamental rights, on a par with the prohibition of untouchability. In this, he was supported by other members of the Constituent Assembly, such as Shibban Lal Saksena, Thakur Das Bhargava, Ramnarayan Singh, Ram Sahai, Raghu Vira, R.V. Dhulekar and Chaudhari Ranbir Singh. Proponents of a cow slaughter ban advanced a mix of cultural and economic arguments, invoking the “sentiments of thirty crores of population” on the one hand, and the indispensability of cattle in an agrarian economy on the other.

There was one small, snag, however: fundamental rights were meant to inhere in human beings, not animals. After much debate, the Constitution’s Drafting Committee agreed upon a compromise: prohibition of cow slaughter would find a place in the Constitution, but not as an enforceable fundamental right. It would be included as a “Directive Principle of State Policy”, which was meant to guide the state in policymaking, but could not be enforced in any court. Furthermore, in its final form, this Directive Principle (Article 48 of the Constitution) carefully excluded the question of religious sentiments. Nor did it require the state to ban cow slaughter outright. Instead, under the heading “Organisation of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry”, Article 48 says the state shall “organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and shall, in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter, of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle

Now so you see the specific cows reference. Now don't go questioning the judgement of our constitution makers. You are not even worth a speck on their boot.
Still dyslexic? Didn't answer the question with your "cut and paste"
I am not interested how your rag tag constitution was drafted or adopted. Every one knows you are Hindus and worship cows, drink cow urine, and smear your self with cow dung. The world knows that and that is where the phrase "Holy Cow" comes from.
I said "Why doesn't your "effing" constitution SAY the cow is sacred.
We know it prohibits cow slaughter though despite this a number of states have shown the middle finger to the Directive Principle and there is very little the cow lynchers can do about it. None of them would want to go to Kohima and tackle a 6 foot Naga with a Dao,
If India is a Hindu majoritarian country and Lord Krishna (or whoever is to be worshipped) then why sneak in the clause in the animal husbandry department section. Why doesn't the constitution say " We the Hindu people of India...).
My other questions remain unanswered:
Why doesn't India enforce the constitutional ban across the country and why does Goa an RSS run state allow cow slaughter?
Why doesn't India bring a resolution in the UN banning cow slaughter world wide? Are only Indian cows sacred? How about the American Black Angus?
If you tell me the world won't listen I don't buy that. Israel has almost universally made anti-semiticism a punishable offense. Why don't to try and ban cow slaughter in Pakistan and send your commandos on surgical strike on the abattoirs?
 
. .
So what are you, a Chinese? of course Bot, go earn your 50 cents. I am generous.
Truth hurts eh? Interesting when I brings up the fact with these pitiful indian they usually either ignore them or just replying with something irrelevant. Truly truth hurts for these pathetic indians.
 
.
Truth hurts eh? Interesting when I brings up the fact with these pitiful indian they usually either ignore them or just replying with something irrelevant. Truly truth hurts for these pathetic indians.
Not as pathetic as you are for parroting CCP nonsense. Shut up and stop quoting me about India. You are just nobody to talk on this.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom