What's new

India’s development potential often overestimated

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
India’s development potential often overestimated despite its unique advantages
By Sun Xihui
286362844d82ead4226649b11ca24ccb.jpeg

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

Many foreign media outlets have expressed optimism at the prospect of the India's development and have even predicted it will prove the victor in its race with China. Some Chinese people also think that India enjoys unique advantages.

During his visit to the US, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promoted India's rise and claimed that its democracy, demographic dividend and market demand constitute the country's ongoing advantages.

There is no denying that India boasts many incomparable advantages in its rising process; these, however, do not necessarily constitute the ingredients for an Indian century.

Democracy is a system where a minority obey the majority to jointly administer state affairs, of which India's Western-style democracy is one type. Liberal democracy as understood by the West is not liberty and democracy in real sense.

There is no necessary connection between democracy and economic development. The Philippines cloned American democracy, but its economy has long lagged behind other ASEAN member states. Thailand, Ukraine, Egypt and other nations with a democratic system have not been able to ensure social stability and development. In India, economic growth is often hindered by its so-called democracy.

With its inefficient bureaucracy, grave corruption and lack of effective regulations, India frequently witnesses violent crimes.

All these demonstrate that good governance and rule of law, instead of Western-style democracy, will be the foundations of India's rise.

Whether its laborers have the right skills and observe the laws, along with demand for labor, will also be the keys to turning India's demographic advantage into an effective labor force.

India's illiteracy rate is still high. As a result, many of its young people lack necessary skills. Many Indians are also characterized by their lackadaisical approach to life.


India also has an imbalance in labor demand, with outsized agriculture and low-end service industries causing insufficient demand for the manufacturing sector. This is of no help to improving labor skills and expanding the country's manufacturing sector.

Market demand refers to consumers' desire and ability to purchase certain commodities or services. There are several factors affecting India's market demand: low levels of overall economic development, a huge wealth gap, and severe social inequality triggered by the caste system.

Changing all these will be a difficult task that requires comprehensive political, economic and social governance.

Compared with India, China has greater development potential. The Chinese system is characterized by highly effective decision-making, thus better resolving the conundrums of education and poverty.

Moreover, China has made greater investment in scientific and technological innovation, and cultivated more high-skilled laborers and high-tech talent.

China has also established a favorable market economic system. A higher economic level means stronger market demand.

Of course, China is facing numerous difficulties and challenges in its development process, as well. Providing sound solutions to domestic issues while not making strategic errors will be crucial in embracing the 21st century.
 
.
Based on where we stand, China will definitely outperform India in the next 20-30 years. China will become industrialized first and deserves to for the effort put in the last 40 years. India lagged behind and has been truly focusing on development over the last 15 years or so. Over a period of time, there will a level playing field though and the gap will converge.
 
.
Problems that India faces:

Land ownership - too many farmers in India are landless tenant farmers that rely on a good harvest to survive. Without a good harvest, they will become penniless.

Education - there is not enough research going on in India at the high end, and too high illiteracy at the low end.

Social/economic - fragmented market, large wealth inequality.
 
. .
The problem with India is their culture.

If India can change their culture of today,

India can became world greatest superpower!


Ancient civilization never equal.

Some have house made from stone that can last long,

Some have extreme complex and very advanced society.
 
.
The problem with India is their culture.

If India can change their culture of today,

India can became world greatest superpower!


Ancient civilization never equal.

Some have house made from stone that can last long,

Some have extreme complex and very advanced society.

Perhaps you should return our cultural artifacts? Please return Buddhism as it is for us, by us, and doesn't comply with yours. tyvm.
 
.
I don't understand what the author want to convey~

In one hand he established that democracy has nothing to do with economic development. It is good governance and rule of law that ensure economic development, which I fully agree.

But in the other hand he linked democracy to failure of economic development. The two are actually independent of each other that linking the two is non-sensical.

Democracy + Better governance and Law = Europe
Authoritatrian + Better governance and Law = Singapore
Democracy + Worse governance and Law = India
Authoritatrian + Worse governance and Law = North Korea
 
.
Perhaps you should return our cultural artifacts? Please return Buddhism as it is for us, by us, and doesn't comply with yours. tyvm.

Buddhism actually make China poor and backward.

Like Tibet and Bhutan.

It's not a coincidence.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't understand what the author want to convey~

In one hand he established that democracy has nothing to do with economic development. It is good governance and rule of law that ensure economic development, which I fully agree.

But in the other hand he linked democracy to failure of economic development. The two are actually independent of each other that linking the two is non-sensical.

Democracy + Better governance and Law = Europe
Authoritatrian + Better governance and Law = Singapore
Democracy + Worse governance and Law = India
Authoritatrian + Worse governance and Law = North Korea

North Korea is actually more developed than India. 99% literacy vs. 75% literacy. Average lifespan of 69 years vs. 65 in India. North Koreans are actually taller than Indians by 4 cm.

List of countries by literacy rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of countries by life expectancy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Agree with most of the points -

However this seemed hilarious -

Thailand, Ukraine, Egypt and other nations with a democratic system have not been able to ensure social stability and development. In India, economic growth is often hindered by its so-called democracy.

So Nations with non-democratic regimes for most of their history such as Pakistan, Nepal and Myanmar are economic powerhouses? :lol:


Besides "Non-Democratic" China did suffer same bureaucratic hurdles once upon a time (I would not surprised if they still do) -


723afb9f8b233ba5cb7fc49aa4ececf4._.png


a4af88fcf7bb24a6f851ad8bc36764b1._.png


North Korea is actually more developed than India. 99% literacy vs. 75% literacy. Average lifespan of 69 years vs. 65 in India. North Koreans are actually taller than Indians by 4 cm.

List of countries by literacy rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of countries by life expectancy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes, very true, well said, also they have a far developed and organized economy than Indias ;)
 
Last edited:
. .
This I think was the aim of this article..
No you are wrong. You failed to understand the point of this article because you don't know how we Chinese think. Your country, India, has been made as an example time and time again that proves western style democracy doesn't always work. Sometimes a poor writer makes it sound like government propaganda, but once in a while a more eloquent thinker such as the aurther of this article can really strike a chord. He is not talking potential or efficiency here. He's trying to validate our governance, our way of thinking.

So my Indian friends, if you really believe in democracy and want to turn us Chinese into believers as well, you better stop talking. Just show us how you do it. We are pragmatic people. If india start passing China in all fronts we will believe it. Until then your opinions will be given the same respect as that of Gordon Chen;)
 
.
Your country, India, has been made as an example time and time again that proves western style democracy doesn't always work.

India has only proved that a socialist command economy doesn't work. India only started to liberalize after the early 90s and still needs reforms, before that it pretty much was a planned economy.
 
.
No you are wrong. You failed to understand the point of this article because you don't know how we Chinese think. Your country, India, has been made as an example time and time again that proves western style democracy doesn't always work. Sometimes a poor writer makes it sound like government propaganda, but once in a while a more eloquent thinker such as the aurther of this article can really strike a chord. He is not talking potential or efficiency here. He's trying to validate our governance, our way of thinking.

So my Indian friends, if you really believe in democracy and want to turn us Chinese into believers as well, you better stop talking. Just show us how you do it. We are pragmatic people. If india start passing China in all fronts we will believe it. Until then your opinions will be given the same respect as that of Gordon Chen;)

The part in bold above establishes what I wrote in my previous post.

Next, there can be no comparison between 2 systems where in one the people decide and another where they dont.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom