Well, your diagram, proved my point even more.
Developed/weathier countries seems to be the ones spending less on their military GDP % wise. How come developed countries like Italy, Germany, Japan, Australia etc spend just 1% or so of their GDP on defence than poorer developing countries like India who need this cash even more to improve their living standards than rich countries, and to make things worse, a major proportion of this amount is spent on importing weapons from us in the west/U S and Russia, making our companies even more wealthy/powerful than they are already.
Same with poor countries like Pakistan spending a huge proportion of their GDP on defence with a considerable amount in imports. Meanwhile this money would have better been spent in the country itself/economy. Developing countries need to have a realisty check on whey they stand compared to other countries and know where their priorities should lie.
At least even though Russia still overspends on its military(over 4%
, way more than china, india and even U.S
), still most/almost all of their military spending is spent locally/internally and they also exports tons of them abroad earning them valuable cash. so I will still give them that, they have an excuse at least
, even though that is unsustainable in the long run as well.
Saudi Arabia and UAE get almost all their major weapon systems from abroad, but I can still give them this, since they have the cash/money to burn and a relatively decent living standards. Though they sure could do far better.
Anyway hope these poorer countries will get their acts together as their living standards improve , spend wisely, as this billions are needed more internally than on buying fancy toys from our defence companies/lobbies. After all, nobody is ever going to attack/invade a nuclear power like north Korea, much less bigger ones like Pakistan or India.