india's daksh a rip-off!

[GORKHALI]

Wrong we also ripped Foster-Miller TALON series too Jai Hind..

 

[somebozo]

And indian was indicted in copying sophisticated robot technology, illegally transferring it to India, setting up a firm and then selling it to NY police. However, the whole game was unfolded by the FBI and the original developer of the technology got full rights over the stolen tech. And the India went behind the jail. Many Indians are yet to realize the concept of original innovation and intellectual property. Tech theft is rampant in India as much as any developing country in Asia.

Google it as the link is saved at my home laptop..and I am still at office doing "over time"!

 

[somebozo]

IIT-Kharagpur in US tech theft mess
Jun 28, 2011, 06.51pm IST TNN

IIT-Kharagpur
NEW DELHI: The case against IIT-Kharagpur and its affiliate Technology Incubation and Entrepreneurship Training Society (TIETS) for misappropriation of technology of a US firm in the Northern District Court of California has taken a serious turn.

Recently, the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) described the technology as "valuable and novel" even before IIT-Kharagpur had access to it. What could further complicate matters for IIT-Kharagpur is the fact that the US court has refused to grant it sovereign immunity (given to countries).

IIT-Kharagpur is said to have breached the contract it signed in 2003 with entrepreneur Mandana D Farhang and her affiliate MA Mobile Limited by allegedly passing to others the technology relating to a new platform for mobile computing.

Sanjiv N Singh, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs Farhang and MA Mobile, told TOI from the US, "IIT-Kharagpur should be very worried about the Farhang case. The recent authorization by USPTO of a patent describing Farhang's mobile technology and confirming that the technology in question is valuable and novel -- and was valuable and novel as of the year 2000, long before IIT-Kharagpur even had access to it as a trade secret -- confirms that the Farhang case will be a winner and will very likely result in a significant verdict for our client. Moreover, the case has been approved to proceed and IIT-Kharagpur must remain in it as a defendant, despite attempts by it to have itself dismissed from the case."

IIT-Kharagpur registrar T K Ghosal did not reply to a detailed questionnaire. He told TOI that the "matter is subjudice and the institute would not like to comment".

In the complaint, Farhang's lawyers have made Partha P Chakrabarti, dean, Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy, IIT-Kgp, IIT professors Pallab Dasgupta, Rakesh Gupta, Pravanjan Choudhry, Subrat Panda and Animesh Naskar party to the case by alleging wrongful conduct. Singh said, "There is compelling evidence that agents of IIT-Kharagpur, operating under the direction of and in coordination with Partha Chakrabarti, appear to have misappropriated a US-based company's technology for their own benefit and for dissemination to third parties including IBM and the Indian Railways."

The case relates to 2003 when Farhang and her affiliate entered into an agreement with IIT-Kharagpur and shared a new mobile computing technology. Farhang and her affiliate shared not only critical technology and confidential information with IIT-Kharagpur but also disclosed critical trade secrets relating to marketing, business strategies and various applications for which the technology could be used.

In return, IIT-Kharagpur promised to develop the advanced prototype that Farhang and her affiliate provided to them for specific application with Indian Railways. The complaint in court said while IIT-Kharagpur promised it could deliver because of its influential status in India, it "misappropriated" the technology and "joint venture's customers for their own benefit, giving the technology to IBM and ultimately to the Indian Railways and possibly others".

The complaint also charged IIT-Kharagpur with delaying tactics and launching concurrent court proceedings in India. It said the institute filed for concurrent proceedings ex-parte in Calcutta HC without notice to Farhang or her affiliate. It also said filings submitted by IIT-Kgp in the HC were "rife with egregious factual errors".

 

[Water Car Engineer]

 

[rajusri]

Is it a stupidity competition going on in India defence section?

Dhruv, Israel and now Daksh!

If they cannot do it they are only trying to get some satisfaction out of this!

india's daksh bomb disposal robot seems to be a rip-off like the dhruv.

the daksh is a copy of the ICOR calliber robot.:

daksh:

Yes just like a man is a rip off a monkey!

 

[kingofkings]

illegally transferring it to India, setting up a firm and then selling it to NY police. However, the whole game was unfolded by the FBI and the original developer of the technology got full rights over the stolen tech. And the India went behind the jail."!

Do you have any common sense of what you have said and what you have posted .... It's the dumbest thing I have ever seen and I donno what to say it's beyond stupidity ....

 

[rajusri]

According to his theory!


Original

Rip off

 

[divya]

Do you have any common sense of what you have said and what you have posted .... It's the dumbest thing I have ever seen and I donno what to say it's beyond stupidity ....

i guess he was praising us that how much good are we at marketing that we sold them their own product and americans agreed to purchase them.

 

[GORKHALI]

IIT-Kharagpur in US tech theft mess
Jun 28, 2011, 06.51pm IST TNN

IIT-Kharagpur
NEW DELHI: The case against IIT-Kharagpur and its affiliate Technology Incubation and Entrepreneurship Training Society (TIETS) for misappropriation of technology of a US firm in the Northern District Court of California has taken a serious turn.

Recently, the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) described the technology as "valuable and novel" even before IIT-Kharagpur had access to it. What could further complicate matters for IIT-Kharagpur is the fact that the US court has refused to grant it sovereign immunity (given to countries).

IIT-Kharagpur is said to have breached the contract it signed in 2003 with entrepreneur Mandana D Farhang and her affiliate MA Mobile Limited by allegedly passing to others the technology relating to a new platform for mobile computing.

Sanjiv N Singh, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs Farhang and MA Mobile, told TOI from the US, "IIT-Kharagpur should be very worried about the Farhang case. The recent authorization by USPTO of a patent describing Farhang's mobile technology and confirming that the technology in question is valuable and novel -- and was valuable and novel as of the year 2000, long before IIT-Kharagpur even had access to it as a trade secret -- confirms that the Farhang case will be a winner and will very likely result in a significant verdict for our client. Moreover, the case has been approved to proceed and IIT-Kharagpur must remain in it as a defendant, despite attempts by it to have itself dismissed from the case."

IIT-Kharagpur registrar T K Ghosal did not reply to a detailed questionnaire. He told TOI that the "matter is subjudice and the institute would not like to comment".

In the complaint, Farhang's lawyers have made Partha P Chakrabarti, dean, Sponsored Research and Industrial Consultancy, IIT-Kgp, IIT professors Pallab Dasgupta, Rakesh Gupta, Pravanjan Choudhry, Subrat Panda and Animesh Naskar party to the case by alleging wrongful conduct. Singh said, "There is compelling evidence that agents of IIT-Kharagpur, operating under the direction of and in coordination with Partha Chakrabarti, appear to have misappropriated a US-based company's technology for their own benefit and for dissemination to third parties including IBM and the Indian Railways."

The case relates to 2003 when Farhang and her affiliate entered into an agreement with IIT-Kharagpur and shared a new mobile computing technology. Farhang and her affiliate shared not only critical technology and confidential information with IIT-Kharagpur but also disclosed critical trade secrets relating to marketing, business strategies and various applications for which the technology could be used.

In return, IIT-Kharagpur promised to develop the advanced prototype that Farhang and her affiliate provided to them for specific application with Indian Railways. The complaint in court said while IIT-Kharagpur promised it could deliver because of its influential status in India, it "misappropriated" the technology and "joint venture's customers for their own benefit, giving the technology to IBM and ultimately to the Indian Railways and possibly others".

The complaint also charged IIT-Kharagpur with delaying tactics and launching concurrent court proceedings in India. It said the institute filed for concurrent proceedings ex-parte in Calcutta HC without notice to Farhang or her affiliate. It also said filings submitted by IIT-Kgp in the HC were "rife with egregious factual errors".

?? you said you doing OT and you still got so much time to search google and put something offtopic...btw what kinda job you do mate in weekend ?

 

[rajusri]

This one going to be outstanding weapons against terrorists and in low intensity warfare. More advance one can be used in active combat.

 

[Tshering22]

This one going to be outstanding weapons against terrorists and in low intensity warfare. More advance one can be used in active combat.

It would be even better if we could deploy these in urban centers of NE and J&K. Trust me; special units like SF-21 (in Nagaland and Mizoram) need these sorts of stuff to take out two-timing rogues like NSCM cadre.

 

[LiberalAtheist]

so according to your theory i could say

is the same as

 

[tvsram1992]

U got me on this man, after seeing this name I had a glimpse of my 10th ........... thank you man..... it was good time {rip van winkle a lesson in Telugu in 10th standard (for those who dont know)}

The fellow who was found after 100 years...
Bad 10th class but interesting

 

[Black Widow]

According to his theory!


Original

Rip off

one of the best post in this thread

 

[T90TankGuy]

lovely article . the beauty of it is there are no sources just the fertile imagination of theses guys . they would do great in bollywood . there seems to be a dearth of scripts there.