India’s crackdown in Kashmir: is this the world’s first mass blinding?

[SarthakGanguly]

Use of pellet guns must stop. And accountability for its use fixed. Whoever knew its effects and still sanctioned them must resign

I did it. And neither will I resign nor will I stop. What will you do?

 

[Hiraa]

Kindly go to Palestinians and ask them what they wish to do to Israelis. The answer ranges from eviction to slaughter. The Palestinians are getting a better deal than what they themselves offer.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Nobody forced Hindus to change religion. Those who did, did by choice.

There was no state policy of mass conversion or genocide.

There's no historical evidence, only right wing textbooks.

Only Muslim and other historians. Read the Namas (Babur, Akbar etc etc)
Glowing tributes are there as to who, when, how many and where and in what conditions people had to accept the 'true faith'. It's all there recorded by court chronicles and the Muslim historians.

Many Indian Muslims are still proud of it. I think that is better than your denial.

Check this channel out. This is a full series.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc4iogeOUXNw1RZSNTOlMeg

Both sides hate each other. Palestinians hate the Jews a bit more though, as per the videos.

 

[Mamluk]

Having said that, I have repeatedly urged Pakistani members on PDF to stop demanding that India follow higher morals than what Pakistan does. How did the Pak Army deal with secessionists in East Pakistan? And now in Balochistan? This game of hypocrisy and double standards should stop.

Our soldiers fight REAL militants fully equipped with firearms; they don't shoot unarmed children with pellet guns at point blank range or go house to house to rape women.

 

[Tom M]

Please don't try to hide it we all know the truth of what evil india is doing to the people of Kashmir !!

Please don't generalize it as the people of Kashmir, it's against the Kashmiri protesters. Show me one country on earth where protests (mainly violent) are not dealt with an iron fist ?? Every country would do that, and India is not an exception.

 

[Mamluk]

Only Muslim and other historians. Read the Namas (Babur, Akbar etc etc)
Glowing tributes are there as to who, when, how many and where and in what conditions people had to accept the 'true faith'. It's all there recorded by court chronicles and the Muslim historians.

Many Indian Muslims are still proud of it. I think that is better than your denial.

Like I said, there was no state policy. 1 or 2 incidents over the course of 1000 years of Muslim rule does not amount to systematic, state sponsored conversions.

Actually Muslims treated you far better than you treated Buddhists.

Quote me one line from the books you mention that says forced conversion was a state policy. I know you will attempt to digress again.

 

[ito]

The author of the piece is Mirza Waheed who is a separatist. So naturally he will put his POV.

 

[Tom M]

Nobody forced Hindus to change religion. Those who did, did by choice.

There was no state policy of mass conversion or genocide.

There's no historical evidence, only right wing textbooks.

These are written to justify massacre and ethnic cleansing of Muslims.

You are correct. Just like you said the Armenian genocide never happened in Turkey, every single Turk today still refute it as a propaganda.

Similarly, there is no ethnic cleansing of Muslims happening anywhere, it just propaganda nothing else.

 

[Hiraa]

Check this channel out. This is a full series.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc4iogeOUXNw1RZSNTOlMeg

Both sides hate each other. Palestinians hate the Jews a bit more though, as per the videos.

Because Israel took their land
Imagine if Pakistan had done this to India? Wouldn't indians hate Pakistanis more than they usually do?

Watch their videos, https://www.facebook.com/libertapalestina/?fref=ts , might give you a different perspective. but only if you want to have an open mind while watching this.

Israeli Nature and Parks Authority forces demolished several graves inside a Palestinian cemetery in occupied East Jerusalem on Tuesday morning, according to local sources.

http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=773803


To all the Chinese @Chinese-Dragon @Chinese Bamboo @ChineseTiger1986 here, salute to you country https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...ith-palestinian-territories-on-in-flight-map/

 

[Lurch Adams]

Our soldiers fight REAL militants fully equipped with firearms; they don't shoot unarmed children with pellet guns at point blank range or go house to house to rape women.

The Baloch and Bangladeshis will beg to differ.

I did it. And neither will I resign nor will I stop. What will you do?

If you think that causing indiscriminate harm to civilians solves any law and order problems, then you are deluded. And save your belligerence for the moron who ordered the use of this stupid crowd control measure. If you have the guts then tell them they were wrong in using such a thing in the first place.

 

[Hassan Guy]

The Baloch and Bangladeshis will beg to differ.



If you think that causing indiscriminate harm to civilians solves any law and order problems, then you are deluded. And save your belligerence for the moron who ordered the use of this stupid crowd control measure. If you have the guts then tell them they were wrong in using such a thing in the first place.

 

[Tom M]

Because Israel took their land
Imagine if Pakistan had done this to India? Wouldn't indians hate Pakistanis more than they usually do?

Hate aside, If Pakistan could afford, you would have tried it long back.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Like I said, there was no state policy. 1 or 2 incidents over the course of 1000 years of Muslim rule does not amount to systematic, state sponsored conversions.

Actually Muslims treated you far better than you treated Buddhists.

Quote me one line from the books you mention that says forced conversion was a state policy. I know you will attempt to digress again.

Hundreds of incidents. Muslim empires (with the exception of perhaps Sheh Shah) were all mostly inept and inefficient. This nation is huge and was extremely difficult to traverse. Plus, Muslim rulers were far from the Caliphate and many subordinates fought against each other as much as they fought against 'infidels'. As far as state policy is concerned - it kept changing from one monarch to the next. For example, Sikander forced conversion, but his grandson Zain ul Abidin reversed it. While Babur and Humayun enforced Jizya, Akbar removed it. It was reimposed after his death. The Bahmani kingdoms were Shia and kept fighting among themselves and the Mughals from time to time.
Hyder did not care, but his son Tipu forcefully converted all Hindus and Christians he could lay his hands on.

And BS about Buddhists later with other Pakistanis. Don't bring that Pakistan Studies apologia here. Nalanda, Takshila, Hampi, even the Viharas - even up to yesterday - the Bamiyan Buddhas were not destroyed by Hindus. Heck, even the word Butshikan comes from what? Hindus worship Buddha. The Buddhist Dharmachakra is in our National flag. Don't kid here, talk serious.

I would even add that the Mughal Empire with the exception of Aurangzeb was still comparatively okay. Before that - the Sultanates were hell. For non Muslims.

But no matter what they did, everything pales in comparison to what the Portuguese did in Gomantaka.

 

[Lurch Adams]

View attachment 350341

Reported for trolling by posting irrelevant memes.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

If you have the guts then tell them they were wrong in using such a thing in the first place.

I have had the chance to use something else to make them understand in the past.