India's conventional military superiority over Pakistan is exaggerated.

[Windjammer]

You lot can keep mongering for wars but know this, we never start wars, however we do end them, history is a witness to this very fact.
Pakistan has always been the aggressor and we have always ended all wars with Pakistanis bowing out, ALWAYS.
If you want a war so bad you lot can always start it, just remember that we'll end it.

And as for retaliation for terrorist activities, most of the Pakistanis believe that Indians have a hand in various different terrorist activities in Pak. When has Pakistan ever engaged in a battle with India for killing its citizens or even threatened to?

I guess there's no tax on talking BS.
Did you manage to finish the 1965 war, when in fact your war lords never turned up for the victory toast or did we attack India in 1971.... Indira Gandhi is on record for saying that , ''Indian forces have entered East Pakistan.....in self defence'' ??? ... so learn some history before going berserk with your key board.

 

[911]

War is not a solution for anything. The OP is true, we may have won wars earlier but this time superiority index is just 1.2. With air force's strength shrinking, and regular ammo shortage news, it will be hard for us to win a conventional war. We just don't have the superiority despite larger economy and man power. Also can't neglect the help China will provide to Pakistan in case of war (but only if India is aggressor which is least likely).

Ultimately the reality is not going to be proven on a Internet site but if the indian military thought they could attack Pakistan then they would attack Pakistan esp after Mumbai or something like Pathankot but they are well aware of the consequences for both them and india

Yes we are cowards because we don't risk 1000s of more lives to avenge already dead 166 people.

 

[Mav3rick]

Pakistan can never win a war against India. Enough said!
But carry on with the obsession. Dar ke hi rehna tum log. India has no interest in attacking Pakistan whatsoever. We are not going to gain anything. If at all there is a war, Pakistan won't survive for sure. India might still have a chance though. But yes, India has much more to lose. We are on the path of progress and have a future.
Whereas you can sit back and chill. No worries. You're a failed state and it wouldn't affect the world or anyone living in it in any way to lose you.

Despite all the odds, and there are many many, we are still progressing. We are doing better then we did last year and this tread is set to continue. So a war with India would be disastrous for us too. Although it may mean bigger financial losses and exiting of many international firms and businesses out of India and overall a bigger financial bill for India, it still means a big financial bill for Pakistan too.

However you are correct, at the end of the day, a full fledged war with Pakistan would still greatly weaken India both financially and militarily. Even if the conflict wipes out Pakistani military, as you would like to believe so, it would be at a massive hit to the Indian military which would not be able to defend itself against any aggression from any other country for considerable future.......you would be a pushover even for Bangladesh. So there are some long long lasting repercussions and consequences to wars.

All our wars with India have been because of your actions, from illegal occupation of Kashmir to building hundreds of dams on our rivers in breach of Indus water treaty. It may eventually get to the point where Pakistan would rather opt for war with India to resolve the water issue then to die of thirst. So our next war could be on water, and it will not be nice.

 

[GURU DUTT]

W


Yes we are cowards because we don't risk 1000s of more lives to avenge already dead 166 people.

when you are over the genrations programmed not to ask valid questionand understand the language of lust and greed only instead of love and responsibillty then you take that attitude as weakness and cowrdice

 

[omega supremme]

In you previous comment you replied me that we are not helping them in Yemen because now they are quite capable and now you’re telling me something different.

Plz don't ask silly questions in which class are you studying tell the truth and plz no silly questions or I won't answer.

By capable I mean they have more quantity of troops and better toys to fight with where as their opponent doesn't have better new toys like Arabs and not capable means even with new toys and good size forces they are not very good on ground against their enemies like their wars against Israel they never defeated the Israelis even with superior quantity and equipment

 

[bloo]

I guess there's no tax on talking BS.
Did you manage to finish the 1965 war, when in fact your war lords never turned up for the victory toast or did we attack India in 1971.... Indira Gandhi is on record for saying that , ''Indian forces have entered East Pakistan.....in self defence'' ??? ... so learn some history before going berserk with your key board.

Well the status quo was maintained if you are going by the word I used, "finish". However at the end of hostilities we had captured more Pakistani land whereas Pakistan had captured mostly barren land, even after Pakistan had attacked first to do the same. Technically we had won.
Yes, PAF on Dec 3 engaged in a preemptive air strike which started the war.
As for East Pakistan, NO that was not the start of the 71 war. That was just us giving you the taste of your own medicine we only fueled the dissidents in East Pakistan the same way Pakistan had been doing since 1947 in Kashmir, only difference was we succeeded whereas you lot failed and have been failing even till today.
I know my history, it would do you better to learn the full and unedited history, rather than the edited version from your textbooks.

You are right, apparently you don't really get taxed for talking BS.

 

[BRAVO_]

by the way can somebody sketch, how india will invade pakistan ? i wanna read some war scenarios coz it will be more interesting to read rather than keep posting on and on and wasting the band width and time of readers for nothing,

 

[Talwar e Pakistan]

Our increase in production of tactical nukes are being used as a temporary measure.

Most of our resources and focus is being spent in the war on the Western Front - making our Eastern Front very vulnerable, if an attack was launched. Increase in border skirmishes and suspicious military movements add to the nervous feeling.

Any terrorist attack on India can serve as an excuse for India to ignite it's Cold Start Doctrine.

Once our soldiers begin to return from the Operations in our Western Front - we'll have more than enough capabilities to thwart any Indian conventional invasion.

 

[C130]

No, it does not, it is about 1.25:1, not enough!

no this is clearly a 2.5 to 1 or 3 to 1 advantage, and this is also not taking into account the quality of weapons either.

 

[90ArsalanLeo]

The thing that will affect most in case of war would be indian navy that is a worrying situation for us will we have 6-7 frigates & 5 submarines india is heavily investing in navy their 2 aircraft carriers & 1 Russian leased nuclear submarine with ability to launch SLBM giving them second strike capability will be problematic for us furthermore they are locally making 1st & overall 3rd aircraft carrier plus nuclear submarines. So we need to focus on our navy too and make sure we get some new subs & destroyers while we can

 

[Manas]

A song dedicated to Pakistan . Thank you .

lol..offcourse, you'd say that. Because you think the disruption caused by super power's entrance in the region (US in Afghanistan) is somehow "you" doing it

We had been f*cking your country left and right..kashmir insurgency, mumbai blasts and what not throughout 90's. Where were you? Oh yeah, NO WHERE!

It is ONLY after U.S entered Afghanistan and you got the luck window to reciprocate our superior intelligence operations..

But even here, you are being taken care of....systematically

Your conventional options of fighting war against us have been neutralized effectively by your own admission. Hence the assymetric war under the luck umbrella of world's sole super power.

Pakistan we already have plans for you . So it is always a matter of executing them . Soon or later ...

 

[Joe Shearer]

I guess there's no tax on talking BS.
Did you manage to finish the 1965 war, when in fact your war lords never turned up for the victory toast or did we attack India in 1971.... Indira Gandhi is on record for saying that , ''Indian forces have entered East Pakistan.....in self defence'' ??? ... so learn some history before going berserk with your key board.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

A song dedicated to Pakistan . Thank you .

Pakistan we already have plans for you . So it is always a matter of executing them . Soon or later ...

Okay, right. Just saw the clips in the post above. Is someone somewhere having a competition on who is the most ugliest creature on planet earth? I'd very much like to know.

 

[MilSpec]

On topic, I do agree with the heading, Indian conventional superiority is indeed depleting against Pakistan, Three fronts we need to focus on is Arty/armor, IAF Strike Squadrons, and Independent Naval Battle groups. More than 2380 Arty pieces are on order, about 1100 Tanks and 1800 IFV's are needed to fight obsolesce, and there is a drastic need for additional Missile frigates and NGMV platform and production rate of Indian shipbuilders is a major concern. Finally IAF Sqdn strength is almost at it's alltime low, so yes conventional military strength against Pakistan is exaggerated, and fast depleting. Institutional indecision and and lack of ownership for projects have been root cause for the last decade, almost a lost decade for the forces.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Despite all the odds, and there are many many, we are still progressing. We are doing better then we did last year and this tread is set to continue. So a war with India would be disastrous for us too. Although it may mean bigger financial losses and exiting of many international firms and businesses out of India and overall a bigger financial bill for India, it still means a big financial bill for Pakistan too.

However you are correct, at the end of the day, a full fledged war with Pakistan would still greatly weaken India both financially and militarily. Even if the conflict wipes out Pakistani military, as you would like to believe so, it would be at a massive hit to the Indian military which would not be able to defend itself against any aggression from any other country for considerable future.......you would be a pushover even for Bangladesh. So there are some long long lasting repercussions and consequences to wars.

All our wars with India have been because of your actions, from illegal occupation of Kashmir to building hundreds of dams on our rivers in breach of Indus water treaty. It may eventually get to the point where Pakistan would rather opt for war with India to resolve the water issue then to die of thirst. So our next war could be on water, and it will not be nice.

A fully fledged war between Pakistan and india would go nuclear and would result in the total destruction of both nations. If not total destruction then either or both nations would be left in a situation that they could never recover from and would make the survivors envy the dead. It would also poison and possibly destroy neighbouring nations aswell.