the ease of usage is better for Javelin than Spike
OK, i agree that Javelin more user friendly but using Spike is not too difficult, yeah are differences but still we have to go for a better system. We will be acquiring these ATGM in huge numbers and thats why we should go for cheaper one and when cheaper is also the best then i don't think we should think alot.
We have good ties with Israel. We could just conduct a yearly exercise between both forces where our forces can learn how to use Spike from them.
Apart from this many friendly nations like France, Germany, Singapore etc. are using Spike, they can also help us to train our forces to use this.
IA has many modernization plans for the coming decade and hence we should think about using our funds carefully. We are not that rich but we need rapid modernization, thanx to almost no purchases made during 80s and 90s.
1) SAM and other missiles upgrades which is going on (more than 5 billion$ purchase of Akash, Brahmos and Nirbhay in coming years).
2) MBT upgrades and future talks are on the table.
3) Artillery modernization is also needed.
4) Military Aviation needs both up-gradation and huge expansion
5) FINSAS
6) Future ICV is also among the cards as by the end of this decade they will also be in need of replacement.
I mean if you will calculate, IA will be spending huge sum of money on modernization. IA will be spending around 25-30 billion dollars or even more alone on 2 projects, FMBT and FICV.