What's new

India’s aircraft carrier strategy ‘a failure’ says Chinese military strategist Liu Kui

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
SOURCE: INDIA TODAY

ins-viraat-story_647_022717044103_031217090739.jpg


A Chinese military strategist at a People’s Liberation Army Navy think-tank has dubbed India’s aircraft carrier strategy a failure, calling for China to expand its own carrier programme as the PLA Navy readies its aircraft second carrier.

Liu Kui, of the Naval Equipment Research Institute of the PLA Navy, said that the recent decommissioning of INS Viraat, which left India with one aircraft carrier, had shown that India’s long-time strategy to dominate the Indian Ocean with three aircraft carriers was “falling flat”.

“The Indian Navy’s dream of having three aircraft carriers has fallen flat because it overestimated its R&D capability and the country’s overall strength, and undertook an excessively massive strategy that eventually got stranded,” said Liu, in an article published on the PLA’s official website, in Chinese and in English.

“To achieve the goal of three aircraft carriers, India, while extending the INS Viraat’s service time, invested a lot of money to modify the INS Vikramaditya and carried on with the INS Vikrant development, but the seemingly efficient ‘three-pronged’ approach didn’t go as successfully as expected,” he said.

“The INS Vikramaditya has cost so much money that the new INS Vikrant that should have been commissioned in 2014 won’t be completed until 2018, and whether India can meet that deadline is still uncertain.”

Lessons for China

He said there were “lessons” for China from India’s experience, and that it should carry on with its aircraft carrier programme as well as enhance civilian-military integration to boost capabilities.

His comments came as Chinese military officials signalled that China’s second aircraft carrier – its first home-grown one after the refitted Liaoning – would be ready for sea trials by 2019. At the on-going session of China’s National People’s Congress or Parliament, which announced a 7 per cent hike in defence spending, several military experts have called for a boost to the Navy’s funding and to expand the aircraft carrier programme.

PLA Navy Rear Admiral Yin Zhuo, who is also a member of parliament, said China “needs two carrier strike groups in the West Pacific Ocean and two in the Indian Ocean. So, we need at least five to six aircraft carriers.”

In the article, the PLA Navy expert, Liu Kui, said that Indian navy strategists had envisaged “two aircraft carriers in order to ‘dominate’ the Indian Ocean and control the Bay of Bengal east of India and the Arabian Sea” and “a third aircraft carrier as a mobile force to provide quick aid or sail to other sea areas critical for its interests.”

India’s ocean strategy

“However, in comparison to India’s ocean strategy, its aircraft carrier development hasn’t been a plain sailing,” he said. “First, India isn’t capable of independent ship R&D and modification. Second, India’s strategic layout isn’t consistent with its overall national strength.”

He also said India had a “carrier complex” and “mistook the deterrence of aircraft carrier for combat capability”. “It is imperative to develop aircraft carriers, but it cannot be hurried through. Not all carrier-borne aircraft can be put into combat, but India insisted on increasing the number of aircraft carriers under such circumstances.”

He concluded there were lessons for China, starting with providing “continuous support to the development of aircraft carriers.”

Indian Navy continuously growing in strength

“Although no large-scale warfare broke out in the Indian Ocean in the past few decades, the Indian Navy is continuously growing in strength, and the existence of aircraft carrier especially deters other countries along the Indian Ocean from violating India’s marginal islands. In peacetime, an aircraft carrier is an effective naval vessel that displays deterrence and protects regional and world peace.”He said China should also “continue to reinforce its innovation and R&D capability” rather than, as in India’s case, rely on imports, and also “make steady progress with combat capability as the top priority” rather than “in haste”.

He also called for further civilian-military integration, which has enabled China to build a domestic military industrial complex.

“A major obstacle in India’s development of aircraft carriers is the inadequate overall national strength, which makes it unable to afford the operation and R&D of three aircraft carriers all at once,” he concluded. “The future war isn’t just about the military, but concerns the whole nation. China should promote and implement the military-civilian strategy in depth and advance national and military development in parallel.



http://idrw.org/chinese-military-strategist-liu-kui-says-indias-aircraft-carrier-strategy-a-failure/
 
. . .
All this problems will come down once our private companies start taking over.
It's just matter of time and political support
Need is already there
Everything follows later
 
.
Where is the comparison?

China is an infant w.r.t aircraft carriers.
 
.
did he said anything wrong?

It's wrong because the strategy of having 3 carriers is not dependent on Viraat. Viraat was supposed to have been decommissioned a long time ago. The carrier was commissioned in 1959, no clue what he's expecting from such an old carrier.

The 3 carriers are supposed to be Vikramaditya, Vikrant(IAC-1) and Vishal(IAC-2). It is possible that IAC-2 will be a second albeit modified IAC-1.

Then, that talk of 'carrier complex' is plain jealousy. We know what we are doing. We are planning to be a 200-ship navy by 2027. So 2 or even 3 carriers by 2030 is obvious. In comparison, the USN is a 300-ship navy and has over 20 carriers. Whereas PLAN is a 500-ship navy with only 1 experimental carrier. They know that they cannot access the world's oceans without the carriers. So they don't like the fact that India is ahead in this department.

Lastly, I have no clue what he means by India cannot afford 3 carriers. I think his words are meant for domestic audience, so the only people who will be impressed by this article will be enemies of India. It's a typical propaganda piece.

When it comes to such articles, there's only one simple truth. Whenever the Chinese talk crap about some aspect of India, they are actually envious of that aspect of India.
 
.
A Chinese military strategist at a People’s Liberation Army Navy think-tank has dubbed India’s aircraft carrier strategy a failure, calling for China to expand its own carrier programme as the PLA Navy readies its aircraft second carrier.
India's aircraft strategy is a failure.... so China should expand its own carrier program... says the Chinese Think Tank whose thinking capabilities have tanked.
 
.
Chinese Strategist belittling India Carrier plan, should we get surprised. Every country strategist will try to take down enemy strategy.

Strategy failed or not that time will tell, but one thing that tells us, Chinese consider India as one of the major maritime force to reckon
 
.
It's wrong because the strategy of having 3 carriers is not dependent on Viraat. Viraat was supposed to have been decommissioned a long time ago. The carrier was commissioned in 1959, no clue what he's expecting from such an old carrier.

The 3 carriers are supposed to be Vikramaditya, Vikrant(IAC-1) and Vishal(IAC-2). It is possible that IAC-2 will be a second albeit modified IAC-1.

Then, that talk of 'carrier complex' is plain jealousy. We know what we are doing. We are planning to be a 200-ship navy by 2027. So 2 or even 3 carriers by 2030 is obvious. In comparison, the USN is a 300-ship navy and has over 20 carriers. Whereas PLAN is a 500-ship navy with only 1 experimental carrier. They know that they cannot access the world's oceans without the carriers. So they don't like the fact that India is ahead in this department.

Lastly, I have no clue what he means by India cannot afford 3 carriers. I think his words are meant for domestic audience, so the only people who will be impressed by this article will be enemies of India. It's a typical propaganda piece.

When it comes to such articles, there's only one simple truth. Whenever the Chinese talk crap about some aspect of India, they are actually envious of that aspect of India.

Great! I hope Mr. Liu Kui will see your point of view! Of course you are entitled to your opinion, but it may or may not be how other see it, just like a coin, it has two sides, one can say it is Head, the other can say it is tail, both are NOT WRONG; such as I read Mr. Liu's article, I see only, he is caution China should not take India path, that will spend more money but result is not as projected, of course, that is my opinion!

Mr. Liu's article is his opinion about India's aircraft carrier situation, he may or may not be right, but he is entitled to his opinion!


he landed many times before. your title suggested he is NOT capable of landing cause the crash, but in fact it is the fly-by-wire system breakdown, cause the accident. also it is a mock landing on an aircraft carrier not the real aircraft carrier.

Besides, the person is dead, why are you play this kind of "cheap trick" about a dead person!
 
.
Great! I hope Mr. Liu Kui will see your point of view! Of course you are entitled to your opinion, but it may or may not be how other see it, just like a coin, it has two sides, one can say it is Head, the other can say it is tail, both are NOT WRONG; such as I read Mr. Liu's article, I see only, he is caution China should not take India path, that will spend more money but result is not as projected, of course, that is my opinion!

Mr. Liu's article is his opinion about India's aircraft carrier situation, he may or may not be right, but he is entitled to his opinion!

I never said he is not entitled to his opinion. But if someone runs around claiming the earth is flat, then that person won't be taken seriously. Opinions have to make sense. In this case, regardless of how he feels, his opinion is simply wrong. Opinions cannot stand up to facts.

India's 3 carrier force is Vikramaditya, IAC-1 and IAC-2. He thinks it is Viraat, Vikramaditya and IAC-1. That's simply wrong and IN has already explained why it's wrong a long time ago.

This article is a direct fallout from the J-15 crash. Since Chinese carrier capabilities have come into question, they have decided to reduce the impact by ridiculing India's carrier capabilities. A typical case of sour grapes.
 
.
What else you can expect from a Chinese think tank? Between how come a Chinese living under a party regime can think?
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom