What's new

India's 700,000 Army for Kashmir Occupation, while Pakistan Freely recruits from Azad Kashmir!

Indians are there to kill innocent Kashmiri Muslim brothers
No bro,that wrong ,PA kills TTP and other terrorists are they killing muslim brothers too..in the real world ,if you go against the state you get kill specially if you pick up gun or something to hurt or kill someone.
 
.
U r bringing non issue here....I can say IAF bombed north and north east of India to crush Christian Insurgency....We are bombing Taliban, against whom whole world is fighting....

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-dirty-little-secret/articleshow/18565883.cms

This is the problem and Fundamental difference when i even face when i discuss with any sane poster like you...Did you go through the news? They are not simple insurgents. They technically taken over the capital of the State and controlled the treasury and all the Gov Installations. That is called as a war against a nation. And in 1966, we are trying to build our nation as a normal country..

If some one declares war against a nation, they will reciprocate.. Taliban is not declaring war with you...If you are really declaring war against Taliban, Pak- Afgan corridor would be much peaceful as it is today....World is fighting with the Taliban with whom Pakistan supports it...Your supported Taliban is creating terror in Afganistan...and world knows well that Pakistan is not doing anything against them, so US has to come withing your territory to bomb them...West technically drone strike kill all those Talibs who are supported by your Army..

Yes, i agree that you are fighting with Talibans...who are different than the ones you have mentioned,.
 
.
Thi

These roads railways, airport,and other health stuff is for 700000 Indians soldiers so they travel on mean time to kill Kashmiri peoples, any warfare analyst guys will understand good travel network is required for battle field, from so called loc or siachen otherwise shortage of stock may left 700000 trrps in misry as they do suicide dew to stress

really!
 
.
Do you realize why Indian army is in Kashmir ? one word answer Pakistan!
So u saying people of Kashmiries are in love with u guys raizing Pakistani flag every day in front of indian occupied army is a slap to indian occupied army..
What their response with pellet fire to innocent people with no arm... they are rising and 700 thousands indian men cant handel them since and u cud never...
Pakistan will support them till indian solve this issue with Pakistan.. either indendence or Pakistan... or keep ur 700 thousands army there for humilation. Jay ho.
 
.
No bro,that wrong ,PA kills TTP and other terrorists are they killing muslim brothers too..in the real world ,if you go against the state you get kill specially if you pick up gun or something to hurt or kill someone.
Ttp involved in Inside operations
Killing schools kids , mosques,and many other public places were on there lists it's totally different from ttp to Kashmiri freedom movement as they don't target in Indian territory
If u know tamil then u wud also know the pain of Tamils as wl !!
 
.
As per the UN resolution, Pakistan will have to hand over Kashmir to India in totality. India will maintain minimum forces for security as per mandate. 0 Pakistani presence. Then UN forces will conduct the refrundum. we are ready for it. Bring it on....

That's a lie. It calls for Pakistani forces to withdraw and the region will be under supervision of UN forces. Of course the Azad Kashmir regiment will stay, as they are the native sons of that land. Not a single piece of the land my forefathers fought for and won will be given over to India.
 
. .
Ttp involved in Inside operations
Killing schools kids , mosques,and many other public places were on there lists it's totally different from ttp to Kashmiri freedom movement as they don't target in Indian territory
If u know tamil then u wud also know the pain of Tamils as wl !!
Oh i dint realise you where talking about terrorists operating outside of India,we are least bothered about them,you can support them ,i thought you where talking about the terrorists who kill local kashmiries ,anyone who cannot defend themselfs and dont agree to the views of terrorists.
Apart from Tamil,i speak 6 other languages,i understand everyones pain.
 
.
Health:

Government is setting up to AIIMS in Jammu and Kashmir (up from 1 earlier) Centre agrees to two ‘AIIMS facilities’ in Jammu, Kashmir

There are already hospitals like the ones below both of which are super speciality hospitals. There are already SMGS, GMC in Jammu and SKIMS in Srinagar and more.

main-qimg-86706370aa291d369dd813ad32132cec-c


main-qimg-3413055bfc6789f1838aae58c6385e7a-c



Energy:
Jammu and Kashmir has a lot of hydel projects under construction and there is plan for worlds largest Solar power project in Ladakh

Houses the world largest solar project

main-qimg-7c813395060c0f7ac5fc1f96202a4dd0-c


EDUCATION

main-qimg-d3c3ce532e8d25eca60d3f6663fb801c



An IIT and IIM are also in the pipeline.

IIT Jammu to start this year with 90 students - Times of India
Centre asks J&K govt to identify land for IIM

Jammu University

main-qimg-ff5007d9db6cd2a6d12a7a1bc0545410-c




The only reason for all this is Pakistan sponsored terrorism in the name of religion.
despite all this so called development, the people are still telling you to f off, whilst here in azad kashmir, as a proud resident i can tell you we love pak armed forces without precondition.
 
.
That's a lie. It calls for Pakistani forces to withdraw and the region will be under supervision of UN forces. Of course the Azad Kashmir regiment will stay, as they are the native sons of that land. Not a single piece of the land my forefathers fought for and won will be given over to India.

Not a single mention of UN force in entire resolution. Where did you get this information?

Pakistan was required to simply leave with his army, tribesmen and nationals. That is all the mention Pakistan got in the resolution.

India had to maintain a minimum working force to administer the state and assist plebiscite administrator to conduct the process. That was too subject to confirmation of Pakistan withdrawal.

I would request you to quote where it mention the UN forces. It talk about hiring of locals for law and order maintenance but even that responsibility lies with Indian government and not UN.
 
.
Not a single mention of UN force in entire resolution. Where did you get this information?

Pakistan was required to simply leave with his army, tribesmen and nationals. That is all the mention Pakistan got in the resolution.

India had to maintain a minimum working force to administer the state and assist plebiscite administrator to conduct the process. That was too subject to confirmation of Pakistan withdrawal.

I would request you to quote where it mention the UN forces. It talk about hiring of locals for law and order maintenance but even that responsibility lies with Indian government and not UN.

Show me where the Indian army sets foot in Azad Kashmir. Do you honestly think Azad Kashmiris would tolerate an Indian administration? The UN would supervise our side, it's common sense....
Oh by the way, the locals will be the Azad Kashmir regiment as well. :-)
 
Last edited:
.
Show me where the Indian army sets foot in Azad Kashmir. Do you honestly think Azad Kashmiris would tolerate and Indian administration? The UN would supervise our side, it's common sense....

International business do not work on common sense, each and every step is well documented.

Indian army was supposed to set the foot in state of Jammu and Kashmir as mentioned in resolution and there was no Azad Kashmir then.

Please do not present your interpretation as some fact and go by the resolution. When things are written as clear as it could be, there is no scope of twisting using supposed common sense.

I am open to reconcile if you can show me where UN mandate its forces to operate on J&K.
 
.
Show me where the Indian army sets foot in Azad Kashmir. Do you honestly think Azad Kashmiris would tolerate and Indian administration? The UN would supervise our side, it's common sense....
Oh by the way, the locals will be the Azad Kashmir regiment as well. :-)
As the so called Azad Kashmir comes over to Indian control, all the Pakistani authrities all Pakistani laws will automatically be nullified and Indian laws will be aplicable till pebliciste. hence the so called azad forces will have to lay down weapons, and will only be recruited by Indians. Once that is done peblisciste will happen in impartial way.

Once India wins it, which it will and that too without cheating, (i repeat you are the bravehearts of the soil but suck in diplomacy and politics) Indians forces will set foot on the land for which the unneccasary blood was spilled.
 
.
Wow great development of India Kashmir, can anyone show bridges, universties, hospital in Pakistan Kashmir as well.

Thi

These roads railways, airport,and other health stuff is for 700000 Indians soldiers so they travel on mean time to kill Kashmiri peoples, any warfare analyst guys will understand good travel network is required for battle field, from so called loc or siachen otherwise shortage of stock may left 700000 trrps in misry as they do suicide dew to stress

India has big planes which would be most effective to send tanks and troops to the other side.
 
Last edited:
.
International business do not work on common sense, each and every step is well documented.

Indian army was supposed to set the foot in state of Jammu and Kashmir as mentioned in resolution and there was no Azad Kashmir then.

Please do not present your interpretation as some fact and go by the resolution. When things are written as clear as it could be, there is no scope of twisting using supposed common sense.

I am open to reconcile if you can show me where UN mandate its forces to operate on J&K.

Then you need to read up on how the UN has operated over the last 50 years, especially regarding conflict resolution. They occupy the place where hostile forces squared off in order to create peace.
There is Azad Kashmir now, and the Indian army will never be allowed there by the locals, and the UN will respect and cater for that.
I just presented my interpretation, you seem to think the UN doesn't have a role in this. How are they going to monitor the process without boots on the ground?
As for the UN mandate, here is the hint, it's a UN resolution, their forces will be there, as they have been in many other conflicts e.g. East Timor, South Sudan etc.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom