śūnya_0_Zero
BANNED
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 158
- Reaction score
- 0
As I said, let the UNSC decide whether India should be in it. Not India itself. Any country can said that UNSC without their country is a joke. But if all 5 permanent members of UNSC agree that its membership without India is a joke, then it is. Until then, its just your personal opinion that counts as much as your comment.
... says a taiwanese, when Taiwan was kicked on it's a$$ and unceremoniously thrown out of the UNSC.
Not just this .. further humiliation for one of those "original 5" with the veto power: Not only kicked out of UNSC, but also out of UN. Poor you ... the "veto" power couldn't save your membership of UN.
And everyone knows who did it .. and who "decided" to take a lollypop from Taiwan and put in Beijing's mouth.
Sorry, we don't give a $hit ... we've got better privileges outside NPT .. and UNSC looks stupid without India.
Meanwhile, the world got wise ... CTBT requires India, while the NPT didn't. (Actually, too bad ... it was better if CTBT was enforced even if India doesn't sign).
See, how quickly G-7 started looking stupid ... and they had no option but to move over to G-20. Nobody cares when G-7 or G-8 meets.
And the much taunted "veto" .... haha .... It's like "You can either have your cake or eat it. Can't have it both ways." Try doing 1 stupid thing, and let's see.
How much of this "veto" power do you think UK and France have?
And how much do China have ... let's see:
The "veto" power:
1. USA - 1.0
2. France - 0.1 (should be obvious, isn't it?)
3. UK - 0.0 (that's obvious)
4. Russia - 0.25 (alright, they tried bravery on Syria and permitted china to hide behind them)
5. China - 0.05 (see reactions to Iran)
If you add all the "veto" powers of the other four, it doesn't add to the P-1
Anyway, losers who were kicked out of UN, have no say .... you can't even vote in the UN General Assembly. Get lost and don't embarass yourself further.