Indians Fighting in Swat : PICTURES PROOF!!!!

[glomex]

Yes that is a possibilty too.

But this is not the only thing we have against India.

There were solid proofs of Indian connection with Baitullah Mehsud and recently Pakistan have provided pictures of Batullah Mehsud and other proxy-Taliban visiting Indian consulate in Afghanistan.

We even have handed over pics of those Indian compounds in Afghanistan which are used for training terrorists by Indians against Pakistan.

Then why is Pakistan Government not making these Pictures Public....

Let the whole world see that Indians are doing something wrong in Afghanistan......

And please don't claim that there was a dossier given to India...Indian Government has refused receiving any such dossier......

PM defends Indo-Pak joint statement - India - NEWS - The Times of India

Pak handed no dossier to India: Govt sources

The only dossier given by Pakistan is a report on action taken on India's Mumbai attack...Pak dossier makes it clear that LeT inspired, financed and executed the Mumbai attack; This is the first time Pakistan formally briefed us on a terror attack in India....

 

[Spring Onion]

Then why is Pakistan Government making these Pictures Public....

Let the whole world see that Indians are doing something wrong in Afghanistan......

And please don't claim that there was a dossier given to India...Indian Government has refused receiving any such dossier......

PM defends Indo-Pak joint statement - India - NEWS - The Times of India

Pak handed no dossier to India: Govt sources

The only dossier given by Pakistan is a report on action taken on India's Mumbai attack...Pak dossier makes it clear that LeT inspired, financed and executed the Mumbai attack; This is the first time Pakistan formally briefed us on a terror attack in India....

The government of Pakistan did not make these pics public.



If Pakistan did not hand over any dossier to Indian PM then why Indian PM agreed to include Balochistan in the joint statment and why Indian parliament is on toes against MM Singh for assuring Pakistan that his govt will look into possible Indian involvment in terror activities in Pakistan.


And hey if Pakistan did not hand over any dossier why Mr Tahroor came up with statment that joint statment is not a legal document .

ah come on closing eyes to facts wont do any good

 

[glomex]

The government of Pakistan did not make these pics public.



If Pakistan did not hand over any dossier to Indian PM then why Indian PM agreed to include Balochistan in the joint statment and why Indian parliament is on toes against MM Singh for assuring Pakistan that his govt will look into possible Indian involvment in terror activities in Pakistan.


And hey if Pakistan did not hand over any dossier why Mr Tahroor came up with statment that joint statment is not a legal document .

ah come on closing eyes to facts wont do any good

Come on stop twisting words to suit your stand....

If there is a dossier ....do you have a link or a copy of it ...just like the one India gave to Pakistan after Mumbai attacks and also made a limited version of it available for public.

For example: http://www.hindu.com/nic/dossier.htm

 

[Spring Onion]

Come on stop twisting words to suit your stand....

If there is a dossier ....do you have a link or a copy of it ...just like the one India gave to Pakistan after Mumbai attacks and also made a limited version of it available for public.

For example: The Hindu : Mumbai Terror attacks - Dossier of evidence

ehh come on man. Mumbai was totaly different incident and constant stable terror camps run by Indians in Afghanistan is another.


I am not at all twising words. Just do reply me if there was no dossier handed over to India why your PM agreed in the joint statment to look into Indian involvement in Balochistan and FATA????

 

[glomex]

ehh come on man. Mumbai was totaly different incident and constant stable terror camps run by Indians in Afghanistan is another.


I am not at all twising words. Just do reply me if there was no dossier handed over to India why your PM agreed in the joint statment to look into Indian involvement in Balochistan and FATA????

Well the only answer to you question is ...
I am as confused and as surprised and so is India general public.....because we have read the statement ...just like you have read the statement.....and we have not been shown the proof...just like you have not been shown the proof......

But the only difference here is ....India government has denied receiving any dossier...but Pakistan government has not countered the Indian denial....so this brings us back to square one.....

You interpret the statement by saying India is involved in Terrorism in Baluchistan so it has allowed reference to Baluchistan to be added in Statement...where as we believe that India has no role in Baluchistan...so India is being transperent.

This is proved by statements made by Baluch Leaders...

DAWN.COM | Provinces | No foreign help for Baloch struggle: BRP

India not involved in Baloch unrest, says Baloch Republican Party- Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times

And by Indian PM:
India not interfering in Balochistan: Singh - GEO.tv

And by Indian Home Minister:
The Hindu News Update Service

 

[Spring Onion]

Well the only answer to you question is ...
I am as confused and as surprised and so is India general public.....because we have read the statement ...just like you have read the statement.....and we have not been shown the proof...just like you have not been shown the proof......

But the only difference here is ....India government has denied receiving any dossier...but Pakistan government has not countered the Indian denial....so this brings us back to square one.....

You interpret the statement by saying India is involved in Terrorism in Baluchistan so it has allowed reference to Baluchistan to be added in Statement...where as we believe that India has no role in Baluchistan...so India is being transperent.

This is proved by statements made by Baluch Leaders...

DAWN.COM | Provinces | No foreign help for Baloch struggle: BRP

India not involved in Baloch unrest, says Baloch Republican Party- Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times

And by Indian PM:
India not interfering in Balochistan: Singh - GEO.tv

And by Indian Home Minister:
The Hindu News Update Service

Official statements are just day to day formalities you know it very well and we know it very well.

for us the victory was when MM Singh was forced to drop terrorism from talks between the two countries and making Balochistan as part of it. It was the dossier which have made it possible.

Now these statments of denial by Indian officials have no value other than press briefings

 

[humblehobbes]

Dudette.. It was a magnanimous gesture. Not a whimpering concession given due to pressure.

 

[Spring Onion]

hmmm.. employee of "Zaid & Ahmed Corp." yeh

None of your business. So stop trolling.

here's how "Bharat Verma Associates" look at it

or​

now your PM has already made it an International issue... people who did not even know on which side of the marz baluchistan was, will now find it do you still consider it a "victory"

Balochistan is our internal matter and we are not afraid if anyone know about what India is doing in Balochistan.

It is not an international issue but yes Indian terrorism in Balochistan is indeed an international issue.

yes its still a victory

 

[King Julien]

None of your business. So stop trolling.

Now I really wonder what's trolling... Glomex above debated with media reports, but you kept speculating things... what will you tag yourself?

Balochistan is our internal matter and we are not afraid if anyone know about what India is doing in Balochistan.

It is not an international issue but yes Indian terrorism in Balochistan is indeed an international issue.

Internal issue, not an international issue: even after alleged Indian Involvement?

yes its still a victory

anyways, here's the official statement
Gilani's statement

With reference to Indian interference in Baluchistan we have informed India in categorical terms and it was the part of our joint declaration.

When matter proceeds then the time will come to provide further evidence

Manmohan's statement

“But if you have any evidence, we are willing to look at it because we are an open book, we have nothing to hide. We are not afraid of discussing any of these issues,”

"No Evidence Provided"​

 

[sabir]

Jana, You have not answer my question.
I cant guarantee about efficiency of our intelligency...but definitely about their inefficiency...the things you are alleging is beyond their capabilities.

 

[Awesome]

Jana, You have not answer my question.
I cant guarantee about efficiency of our intelligency...but definitely about their inefficiency...the things you are alleging is beyond their capabilities.

These pictures point towards an Indian hand (especially if there are many more such corpses out there) because its easy to grow a beard, learn a language and act in a certain way to infiltrate groups. But its not so easy for a grown man to go through circumcision which may be the way to prove India's involvement in Afghanistan based terror groups.

 

[sabir]

These pictures point towards an Indian hand (especially if there are many more such corpses out there) because its easy to grow a beard, learn a language and act in a certain way to infiltrate groups. But its not so easy for a grown man to go through circumcision which may be the way to prove India's involvement in Afghanistan based terror groups.

its not that hard either. You can ask any Doctor. I heard of adult converts who went through it and thats without local anesthetia.

 

[Spring Onion]

Jana, You have not answer my question.
I cant guarantee about efficiency of our intelligency...but definitely about their inefficiency...the things you are alleging is beyond their capabilities.

Yes i agree with you. But see what is the main issue.

Indian govts and intellegence have been involved in supporting and funding the Baloch terrorists from BLA since long but as you had mentioned the Indian intellegence is not capable of doing much damage thats why we see just low intensity incidents in Balochistan sincce long like blowing up of gaslines.


Now the game currently have taken a different turn where more thsan India, CIA is involved. I always say that RAW had never succeeded on a large scale against Pakistan unless it has support from other intellegence agencies like Mossad, KGB, in the past and now fortunatly for India it had got support from CIA mainly in this case under who's nose India is runing terror camps in Afghanistan.


Its another matter that CIA is allowing India because it benefit CIA intrests and policies at the moment.


Kindly repeat your question i think it was overlooked.

 

[nwmalik]

Dudette.. It was a magnanimous gesture. Not a whimpering concession given due to pressure.

from Mr Singh?
i think u forgot his undiplomatic rather insulting statement to Mr Zardari.
Now suddenly he has become so magnanimous.
Dont joke

 

[macrocks]

The government of Pakistan did not make these pics public.



If Pakistan did not hand over any dossier to Indian PM then why Indian PM agreed to include Balochistan in the joint statment and why Indian parliament is on toes against MM Singh for assuring Pakistan that his govt will look into possible Indian involvment in terror activities in Pakistan.


And hey if Pakistan did not hand over any dossier why Mr Tahroor came up with statment that joint statment is not a legal document .

ah come on closing eyes to facts wont do any good

Well you are very much acting like Indian opposition parties(Reading too much into Baluchistan statement). Let me answer your first question.
Baluchistan was included by PM because "We have nothing to hide".
Indeed the point is Pakistan is unlikely to project any solid proof regarding Baluchistanon the International forum and if they provide some sub-standard proof then only India is going to gain by Internationalising an internal problem of Pakistan. As India is not involved so the PM is ready to discuss it in lieu of Pakistan taking action against 26/11 attackers(Read Haffiz Sayeed).

As far as second question is concerned it is for making sure that the opposition doesn't make it a big issue ahead of Maha polls and is only a preventive measure.