Indians boycotting 'Made in China' wares for Beijing's support to Pak

[AndrewJin]

... Means that 二百五

Good one.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Why don't we start a war with pk and chinis?

Because India's stockpiles only support 20 days of fighting... Still unable to overcome China's second-tier troops stationed in Tibet.

 

[Hindustani78]

OK, Indians talk about high IQ, quality, technology and now boycotting.

It seems that Indians seriously have these kind of capabilities to beat their west counterparts.

They told that they are biggest democratic country and try hard to look down upon others. They proved themselves that China's socialism system is more superior.

I suggest that our netizens don't treat this kind of 'news' too seriously. The 'news' is sold to their own people and we don't have to buy it.

We should seriously support our brother country Pakistan to develop the economy to become an economic hub of south asia then India will concentrate more on their people and economy with more jealousy.

Georgia and Ukraine war , events in Greece , Britian exit from EU is showing the real failure of the policy adapted by some countries.

Indian establishment is having a very stable and clear foreign policy. In this era of alliances , all are aware the importance of Indian Nation. Suvarnayug has came to the Indian nation and its cousins.

 

[WhyCry]

Good luck with that knee jerk reaction.

Thanks for being the jerk

 

[Holmes2]

Because India's stockpiles only support 20 days of fighting... Still unable to overcome China's second-tier troops stationed in Tibet.

I see a spark of war btw India, china and pk in near future. Maybe the US will assist India in such a war.

 

[Hindustani78]

Because India's stockpiles only support 20 days of fighting... Still unable to overcome China's second-tier troops stationed in Tibet.

This is why i have said that Indians are nationalistic nation.

We wont repeat the past mistakes again. We Indians learn alot from our history.








Musa Shah, Cherag Ali Shah, Paragal Shah, Sobhan Shah, Madar Baksh, Jari Shah, Karim Shah, Kripanath, Rowshan Shah, Anup Narayan and Sri Nibash continued the revolt till the closing of the year 1800 and even upto 1812 AD.

 

[WhyCry]

Because India's stockpiles only support 20 days of fighting... Still unable to overcome China's second-tier troops stationed in Tibet.

Hope that they are paid well enough to replace their underwear ties.

I see a spark of war btw India, china and pk in near future. Maybe the US will assist India in such a war.

Okay stop with the war mongering. If there is one it will need much more than words.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

I see a spark of war btw India, china and pk in near future. Maybe the US will assist India in such a war.

Oh, that you should now be to request US to attack China.
US or India, who wants to begin?
I guess... The US will make India first offense.

This is why i have said that Indians are nationalistic nation.

We wont repeat the past mistakes again. We Indians learn alot from our history.








Musa Shah, Cherag Ali Shah, Paragal Shah, Sobhan Shah, Madar Baksh, Jari Shah, Karim Shah, Kripanath, Rowshan Shah, Anup Narayan and Sri Nibash continued the revolt till the closing of the year 1800 and even upto 1812 AD.

By the way, error is not caused by China in 1962.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/392828/forward-policy-nehru-govt-blamed.html

 

[Flash_Ninja]

I see a spark of war btw India, china and pk in near future. Maybe the US will assist India in such a war.

No they wouldn't they'd stay neutral, or join as peacekeepers.

US-India relations are not that airtight, and the only non-NATO nations they'd support in war would probably be Japan or S.Korea

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Hope that they are paid well enough to replace their underwear ties.

I reply to some unpleasant speech, not for others.

 

[Hindustani78]

Oh, that you should now be to request US to attack China.
US or India, who wants to begin?
I guess... The US will make India first offense.
View attachment 341568


By the way, error is not caused by China in 1962.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/392828/forward-policy-nehru-govt-blamed.html

View attachment 341569

'Panchsheel treaty was still in force when India became independent in August 1947.But in October 1950, an event changed the destiny of the Himalayan region: Mao's troops marched into Tibet.

But it was basically the Shimla accords of 1913 , was a treaty concerning the status of Tibet negotiated by representatives of the Republic of China, Tibet and the United Kingdom.

 

[WhyCry]

I reply to some unpleasant speech, not for others.

So do I .

 

[SBUS-CXK]

'Panchsheel treaty was still in force when India became independent in August 1947.But in October 1950, an event changed the destiny of the Himalayan region: Mao's troops marched into Tibet.

But it was basically the Shimla accords of 1913 , was a treaty concerning the status of Tibet negotiated by representatives of the Republic of China, Tibet and the United Kingdom.

Let me think about it... UK manufacturing the Kashmir issue, Tibet issue, falkland islands issue, Gibraltar issue, Suez Canal issue.
UK in manufacturing problems all over the world, and then get interests.
UK treaty signed, to be trusted? Don't you remember the polish?

 

[beijingwalker]

'

But it was basically the Shimla accords of 1913 , was a treaty concerning the status of Tibet negotiated by representatives of the Republic of China, Tibet and the United Kingdom.

That's why we should talk to UK but not India.

 

[jkroo]

'Panchsheel treaty was still in force when India became independent in August 1947.But in October 1950, an event changed the destiny of the Himalayan region: Mao's troops marched into Tibet.

But it was basically the Shimla accords of 1913 , was a treaty concerning the status of Tibet negotiated by representatives of the Republic of China, Tibet and the United Kingdom.

Where's India at that time?

The stepson want to inherit his stepfather's robbery property.

What a hilarious statement.