What's new

Indians Also Beheaded Pakistani Soldiers

At least it takes all that high and mighty position off..

Ohh.. we never beheaded anyone.

Sorry folks.. welcome to the same boat.
 
Tons of difference in beheading someone in hand to hand combat vs making someone a captive and then torturing him to death.

Happens on both sides.. the focus was on your supposed innocence in mutilation.. that has been disproved within the context of an interview. Unless of course you dont have the ego to admit it.
 
Why does this not come as a shock, PA soldiers have been mutilated and tortured before.
On Indian talk shows, while PA spokesmen and defence analysts from Pakistan have denied the beheading, they did mention that similar events have occurred in the past.
 
At least it takes all that high and mighty position off..

Ohh.. we never beheaded anyone.

Sorry folks.. welcome to the same boat.


NA!!!! Lo ji aap to do -chaar sister websites of Rupee news se aap hame same boat pe toh mat daalo.

Baboons or Langoors?

Seems to be an obsession with monkey *****.

The question is of which monkey hides its butt better.

Saar!!!Ji don't split the hair ..:P
 
Beheading in military Ops happens frequently, particularly in covert ops where the target must be eliminated without alerting everyone else, so if you have a dagger handy, what to do next is pretty much instinctive.
 
Happens on both sides.. the focus was on your supposed innocence in mutilation.. that has been disproved within the context of an interview. Unless of course you dont have the ego to admit it.

And I did agree in my very 1st post. But havent heard of these so called mutilations by Indian Army during peace time. If you have, please share sources.

Beheading in military Ops happens frequently, particularly in covert ops where the target must be eliminated without alerting everyone else, so if you have a dagger handy, what to do next is pretty much instinctive.

Isnt a dagger thru the heart or cutting of the jugular vein/ cartroid artery a much faster and easier option. In my view, beheading is nothing to do with instinct. Its a very deliberate and calm message

waise, its funny that when an ex ISI general talks about Pakistan's complicity in terrorism, its because he has an axe to grind against Musharraf.. But one sentence from an ex Indian Admiral which goes against Indian position, suddenly becomes gospel truth :D
 
Isnt a dagger thru the heart or cutting of the jugular vein/ cartroid artery a much faster and easier option. In my view, beheading is nothing to do with instinct. Its a very deliberate and calm message


You cut the veins and slice the wind pipe in one single movement, the person you are holding is also trying to move away and you are holding their head, sometimes it get's ugly, then sometimes the neck is additionally broken to make it quick. Beheading doesn't necessarily mean that the head is lying away from the body, a significant cut can also leave the head attached by some skin and muscle fibres.
 
Even then, i can see the top of your head.....stop being the habitual drama queen and see there is an authentic article contained within the source.

No, that would be the head of another Pakistani.. I chose not to be in the same water as you ;)

Still :lol: at the source, since the real article simply talked about what Pakistan claimed. The dung source you put in actually accepted that as God's own word (like most Pakistanis do when PA says something ) :)

You cut the veins and slice the wind pipe in one single movement, the person you are holding is also trying to move away and you are holding their head, sometimes it get's ugly, then sometimes the neck is additionally broken to make it quick. Beheading doesn't necessarily mean that the head is lying away from the body, a significant cut can also leave the head attached by some skin and muscle fibres.

Which is not the case here since the head is missing.
 
Which is not the case here since the head is missing.

I doubt that there is an issue to begin with because the Spokesperson for the Regional Command confirmed to Reuters two days before Bikram Singh's interview that none of the soldiers had been beheaded.
 
I doubt that there is an issue to begin with because the Spokesperson for the Regional Command confirmed to Reuters two days before Bikram Singh's interview that none of the soldiers had been beheaded.

That's what I keep saying.. its not like they had to do an investigation to see if the head was attached or not..
seems like the "beheaded" STORY stuck after it was bounced around.. and found to be good for propaganda.
 
No, that would be the head of another Pakistani.. I chose not to be in the same water as you ;)
Who said i was IN the water. ;)
Still :lol: at the source, since the real article simply talked about what Pakistan claimed. The dung source you put in actually accepted that as God's own word (like most Pakistanis do when PA says something ) :)



Which is not the case here since the head is missing.

Yes who would better know about DUNG.....and then again, the claim of missing head or not indulging in such inhumane practices is made by your virgin Sinha....seems she's not so innocent as most Indians were making it out to be..... in short truly busted .!!
 
Beheading in military Ops happens frequently, particularly in covert ops where the target must be eliminated without alerting everyone else, so if you have a dagger handy, what to do next is pretty much instinctive.

There is a difference between sliting throat and beheading then taking the head back and as the intercepts show they were congratulating and celebrating the beheading. Thats what is frustrating.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom