What's new

Indian troops open fire at vehicle carrying UN military observers

are you kidding me really just read the above two sentences what UN spokesman is saying and what ISPR is saying is complete extreams.
and UN is accepting fire in their vicinity and you are suggesting that they denied the incident is like a fool trying to make other people fool.
ISPR also said that UN observers were fired at. No harm was done and the stance was verified by UN.
No it's your time to prove the denial of ISPR claim.
I gave you proof of UN accepting ISPR stance. Now it's your time to prove that UN said that ISPR claim was baseless and no such incident ever happened.
If you can't than go to sleep.
 
.
They accepted ISPR point of view. just said that they don't know who was the target, because they were hiding at the time of firing .
There is no proof IA fired at them. Only ISPR claimed it was India which is normal. If UN claimed it was from Indian side then there is a situation. Else:close_tema:and move on.
 
.
read the post below and shut up still waiting for mythical strike and beheading of soldiers explanation
Read the previous posts and find the UN official statement with the UN link .:rofl:
 
.
Read the previous posts and find the UN official statement with the UN link .:rofl:
already read they all agree to heard gunshots fired from indian side

still waiting for mythical strike explanation and again who did beheading of those soldiers :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::flame::flame::flame::flame::cheesy:
 
.
already read they all agree to heard gunshots fired from indian side

still waiting for mythical strike explanation and again who did beheading of those soldiers :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::flame::flame::flame::flame::cheesy:
Nope UN never said they heard gunshots from Indian side, they only said they heard gunshots but not from where.
 
.
and UN is accepting fire in their vicinity and you are suggesting that they denied the incident is like a fool trying to make other people fool.
ISPR also said that UN observers were fired at. No harm was done and the stance was verified by UN.
No it's your time to prove the denial of ISPR claim.
I gave you proof of UN accepting ISPR stance. Now it's your time to prove that UN said that ISPR claim was baseless and no such incident ever happened.
If you can't than go to sleep.

I think you have problems understanding English. You please show the sentences you had posted previously and ask them to tell you what they understood and you will realize who is the fool.
 
. . . .
I think you have problems understanding English. You please show the sentences you had posted previously and ask them to tell you what they understood and you will realize who is the fool.
I think you have problems understanding English. You please show the sentences you had posted previously and ask them to tell you what they understood and you will realize who is the fool.
it is other way around.
Indians only pic the word or sentence which suits them ignoring the rest of the essay.
 
. .
already read they all agree to heard gunshots fired from indian side

still waiting for mythical strike explanation and again who did beheading of those soldiers :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::flame::flame::flame::flame::cheesy:
Open a thread on what ever you are asking this thread is about PA claim that Indian troops fired on UN observers. I hope you have basic understanding of English to understand hearing dsnt mean they where fired upon.
 
.
Open a thread on what ever you are asking this thread is about PA claim that Indian troops fired on UN observers. I hope you have basic understanding of English to understand hearing dsnt mean they where fired upon.
yeah they heard imaginary gunshots like imaginary strike by indians
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom