Mirza Jatt
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2010
- Messages
- 5,701
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
No, because you were originally going to get 100% of it but we took 40% of it.
who are you future teller ? lol.. all I kow is..we didn't have any Kashmir until you attacked and we got 60%.
I'll say it again, the war started when Hindustan invaded on the 6th of September. Operation Gibraltar was part of pre-war escalation, just like the Rann of Kutch incident or skirmishes that occurred earlier in the year.
say that a hundred times. the pre war escalation might be your part of strategy to look at it as two different parts, for India it was a direct attack and we had to save our selves. We did not only moved to defend our land, we also attacked yours and the way it progressed, after initial land loss, we took your Lahore and you were set to lose bigger that's the time your general showed smartness and signed the ceasefire.
You must be stupid if you think that was the mission. The mission was for Pakistan to gain control over Kargil, and we got Point 5353 which is the dominating peak in the region, overlooking the national highway. Former Lt. Col. Kuldip Singh Ludra states, "it dominates, by observation and fire, the complete area on both side of the Line of Control". We won, you lost. Accept it and move on.
Unless you have anything new or intelligent to add to the discussion, don't expect a reply.
You had to leave. LEAVE. occupying anything that does not affect our boundary is or operations means nothing to us though it could mean face saver to you. Observe as much as you can from whatever peak we couldn't care less.. just remember a mistake of a single firing would mean another kargil but I guess your army knows that and has learnt from the loss of 1999 so they wont make any mistake.. and again thanks NS for saving your army or a war of higher escalation.
Since you are giving up again.. let me remind you that you started a claim on a high note trying to "prove" that it was your victory... you have failed to prove after your amateur attempt of copy pasting few newspaper cuttings which proved nothing.. I reiterate ..nothing...lol. I don't know whether you even laugh at your fantasy theories of 1:10 kafirs.. io guess not because your posts are reflective of that belief.
Also I debunked your 1:10 kafir theory, I debunked your 1947 theory, I debunked your 1965 theory, I debunked your 1847 theory, I debunked your 1999 theory. I am still waiting for the proof and logical reasoning of your claims of these victories..unless you do that. refrain from claiming these victories in any of the threads as long as at least I am here, because every time you try to post these lies to bend history in your favour expect a reply.