Liquidmetal
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,251
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Hilarious, thanks buddy...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hilarious, thanks buddy...
DGMO said it will But not on this Time because It a Tense Situation And India and Pakistan is at War behind the scenesHowever, the Indians can prove their claims by providing evidence to the world, why is India refusing to do so, considering how good they are with providing the necessary resources for the independent media to use and hence verify the truth of the claims.
There Is No Surgical strike in world Which has Precise information of Strikes there Some things Which are classifiedThe details being provided by the Indians are very sketchy and are not precise. The raids took place at 12:30 along a 15KM arc along the LOC and upto 3KM deep into AJK. The raid involved 7-8 helicopters who flew undetected across the LOC and flew back. Then this was changed to state no helicopters took place but the SFs trekked for upto 10 hours there and back and killed upto 40 people. There for 70-120 troopers involved, and after creating an almighty fire fight were able to snuck back past the PA jawans who did not raise an alarm during this 10 hours excursion.
Same here, it has become one big joke, until they produce an iota of evidence I am going to refrain from making any further comments on this hindian charade.KudosBro i am getting tired of this BS
If you assume that India's claims are true, you can get answers for the rest of the questions@Windjammer @MastanKhan
I want to be impartial and just understand the true events that took place concerning the claimed Indian surgical attacks.
I wish somone would step up and explain to me the truth of these claims and counter claims. And for God sake provide some verifiable evidence.
- Granted the Indians do have a well equipped and well special forces that can undertake special ops and strikes, which were proven last year in Myanmar. My difficulty is why would India claim a strike if it did not carry one out. The Indians are very media savvy and understand how to manipulate the media for the best results. Therefore why would India make up a story with the consequent loss of face if it was proven that they were lying.
- However, the Indians can prove their claims by providing evidence to the world, why is India refusing to do so, considering how good they are with providing the necessary resources for the independent media to use and hence verify the truth of the claims.
- Similarly ISPR has also failed to provide any evidence we can rely on to confirm PA's claim that India is lying.
- India claims at least 35 men were killed at 7 launch pads, this should have created a great deal of forensic evidence including noise from families who have lost their sons, a clamor for revenge and a lot of photos by third party witnesses within the vicinity of the launch pads. Why is this missing?
- The details being provided by the Indians are very sketchy and are not precise. The raids took place at 12:30 along a 15KM arc along the LOC and upto 3KM deep into AJK. The raid involved 7-8 helicopters who flew undetected across the LOC and flew back. Then this was changed to state no helicopters took place but the SFs trekked for upto 10 hours there and back and killed upto 40 people. There for 70-120 troopers involved, and after creating an almighty fire fight were able to snuck back past the PA jawans who did not raise an alarm during this 10 hours excursion.
- Was the PA asleep during this period (possible and not discounting this) and hence can someone explain how this is possible.
- Both PA and IA maintain a 24x7x52 vigil across the LOC, did the IA find gaps in the PA's vigil and if so should heads be rolling for this dereliction of duty.
where did Indian Army claimed 35 mens killed? all news channel TRP lines.If you assume that India's claims are true, you can get answers for the rest of the questions
why would India claim a strike if it did not carry one out.
perhaps they did the strike (lets assume this for a moment so I can give a plausible narrative for the rest of the questions)
However, the Indians can prove their claims by providing evidence to the world, why is India refusing to do so
India claims they do have the video footage via their UAVs. They have not refused to show evidence, they say the evidence will be shown at their choosing
Similarly ISPR has also failed to provide any evidence we can rely on to confirm PA's claim that India is lying
this, is not a question.
India claims at least 35 men were killed at 7 launch pads, this should have created a great deal of forensic evidence including noise from families who have lost their sons, a clamor for revenge and a lot of photos by third party witnesses within the vicinity of the launch pads. Why is this missing?
most terrorist activities are carried out by youth who are already "Away" from family. also, it requires the people to first know the details of who is dead. that news may not have reached the families given that a) either the strike did not happen or b) Pak is refusing that the strike happened hence cannot disclose who got killed.
The details being provided by the Indians are very sketchy and are not precise. The raids took place at 12:30 along a 15KM arc along the LOC and upto 3KM deep into AJK. The raid involved 7-8 helicopters who flew undetected across the LOC and flew back. Then this was changed to state no helicopters took place but the SFs trekked for upto 10 hours there and back and killed upto 40 people. There for 70-120 troopers involved, and after creating an almighty fire fight were able to snuck back past the PA jawans who did not raise an alarm during this 10 hours excursion.
I dont think any of the above details were provided. the only "credible" details were by the army spokesperson who said the IA did indeed get inside Pakistan controlled territory and neutralized terrorists that were planning to get into Indian side.
Was the PA asleep during this period (possible and not discounting this) and hence can someone explain how this is possible.
I doubt the PA "asleep" theory. I would rather bet on locations along LOC that have gaps on the Pakistan side - which would also explain why India is not willing to give proof of the location without clearing out the data to make sure those details are not provided to PA on a platter.
n
no helmet cam footage(most common) no photo?
8 choppers un detected? i mean it doesn't even happens in films mate...
If you assume that India's claims are true, you can get answers for the rest of the questions
why would India claim a strike if it did not carry one out.
perhaps they did the strike (lets assume this for a moment so I can give a plausible narrative for the rest of the questions)
However, the Indians can prove their claims by providing evidence to the world, why is India refusing to do so
India claims they do have the video footage via their UAVs. They have not refused to show evidence, they say the evidence will be shown at their choosing
Similarly ISPR has also failed to provide any evidence we can rely on to confirm PA's claim that India is lying
this, is not a question.
India claims at least 35 men were killed at 7 launch pads, this should have created a great deal of forensic evidence including noise from families who have lost their sons, a clamor for revenge and a lot of photos by third party witnesses within the vicinity of the launch pads. Why is this missing?
most terrorist activities are carried out by youth who are already "Away" from family. also, it requires the people to first know the details of who is dead. that news may not have reached the families given that a) either the strike did not happen or b) Pak is refusing that the strike happened hence cannot disclose who got killed.
The details being provided by the Indians are very sketchy and are not precise. The raids took place at 12:30 along a 15KM arc along the LOC and upto 3KM deep into AJK. The raid involved 7-8 helicopters who flew undetected across the LOC and flew back. Then this was changed to state no helicopters took place but the SFs trekked for upto 10 hours there and back and killed upto 40 people. There for 70-120 troopers involved, and after creating an almighty fire fight were able to snuck back past the PA jawans who did not raise an alarm during this 10 hours excursion.
I dont think any of the above details were provided. the only "credible" details were by the army spokesperson who said the IA did indeed get inside Pakistan controlled territory and neutralized terrorists that were planning to get into Indian side.
Was the PA asleep during this period (possible and not discounting this) and hence can someone explain how this is possible.
I doubt the PA "asleep" theory. I would rather bet on locations along LOC that have gaps on the Pakistan side - which would also explain why India is not willing to give proof of the location without clearing out the data to make sure those details are not provided to PA on a platter.
New Recruit
all bravado and cheech&chong theories aside, what is true is:
1) Indians don't have to prove or disprove anything. The desperation is on the other side to save face
2) Let's hope this motivates Pak militarily to stop using or molly coddling terorrists
3) Modi has redeemed himself to the point his defence minister is going around saying it's been two days and Pak leaders still haven't come out of anasthesia...he should hold his tongue and not gloat
New Recruit
At least Bollywood will be able to make such videos sir, your LOLLYWOOD isn't capable of that alsoWould they ask Bollywood producers for the production of the video?
New Recruit
Pakistanis are protesting too hard! There was no LOC penetration but 18 IA were killed inside the LOC on your side ! Make up your mind first.
Are you so desperate that you have to now make up numbers and facts on your own?
New Recruit
It is the Pakistanis who are claiming that a number of IA soldiers were killed on there side of LOC and one, chohan, was captured.