What's new

Indian Scientists Successfully Intercept Ballistic Missile

You have scored a big zero on this! Ares has explained the concept very well. Read his reply!



While this is factually correct, it still falls in the rant catagory as it follows point 1.



The problem is you have no freakin idea about The swordfish radars used in Indian BMD program.:wave:


Swordfish is an Indian Long range tracking radar specifically developed to counter ballistic missile threat. First testing of this radar was in March 2009.

Main aim of the test was to validate the capabilities of the indigenously developed Swordfish Long Range Tracking Radar (LRTR). "The missile to be hit will be fired from a longer distance than it was in the earlier test. DRDO tested whether the radar could track the incoming missile from that distance or not" said a member of the project:azn:

Also, The Swordfish LRTR currently has a range of 600 km (370 mi)-800 km (500 mi) km range which the DRDO plans to upgrade to 1,500 km by 2011






This assumption is so childish that it doesn't even deserve a reply!:hitwall:



From these lines I now assume (no I infer) that you are a total fanboy and know Freakin nothing about BMD!

I don't know about the world but every sane member here on PDF is laughing at you!:lol:



Here comes the most Interesting bit,

How TF you assumed that the point of impact of the target missile was going to be the AAD launch site? The target missile was launched towards sea and was intercepted over the sea, not anywhere near the AAD launch point.:wave:

You also seem to forget that the range of AAD is 200km, so there goes your most interesting bit into the dust!


Report From The Hindu says---





All the points in bold prove the fallacy of your imaginary claims!:wave:





Now that your BS is exposed, it is time for you to stop being arrogant and go to your studies. Rants like above won't make it right, you know!

You are wasting your time in cleaning his deposits. Its so obvious the so called "PHD guy" is simply ranting.
 
.
I spent more time today reading stuff on this topic and have concluded that I was actually wrong yesterday. The anti missile test conducted by india yesterday was a purely shameless propaganda. Please don't cry, I am going to tell you why:

The incoming target missile was shot down on its boost stage.

okay, this is cool, isn't it? The USA and China simply can not do this. I mean india is the only nation on earth to have such capacity. For decades, scientists have concluded that you need space based weapons to hit and destroy such a ballistic missile during its boost stage. clearly no one has acquired such capacity. during its boost stage, the velocity is small, single missile, very much predictable path. I mean that is the best stage to destroy such a missile.

The problem is your enemy is always going to launch a missile thousands of kilometers away from the border, you don't have enough time to detect the launch and then fly yours to hit the incoming missile during its boost stage


So how india did it yesterday? You will never believe it: india launched the anti-ballistic missile from a site 70 kilometers away from the launch site of the target missile. This means, if China is going launch a missile from say Beijing, india's lovely anti-missile system need to be deployed a couple hundred kilometers away from Beijing to intercept it, say deploy it in Tianjin.

:yahoo:

So what india actually did?

1. assume the launch can be detected by a land based rader.
2. assume the missile is launched no more than a couple hundred kilometers away from their anti-missile system.
3. assume they have such units everywhere and in combat ready status 365/24/7.

This is basically a joke, the entire world is laughing at india.

Here comes the most interesting bit:
Now we all know it is easy to hit a missile in its boost stage and you have anti-missile systems a couple kilometers away. Let's say someone is going to be that stupid to launch it near your border to let you play with your anti-missile system, my question is why the hell they can't use another anti-missile missile to shot down your anti-missile?

You can't understand it? Fine, one simple example:

Chinese forces intentionally move their DF missiles to the launch point which is 200km away from india border, launch it, call india, say "hey, we just launched it from blah blah position. " India fights back, ant-missile system launches its crap. So two missiles are both in its boost stage, 200km away from each other, then please tell me why Chinese forces can't launch another missile to shot down your anti-missile missile?

:woot:

time to wake up, the regime intentionally made this project to fuel nationalism. they are your enemy.

absolutely crap... you know the target missile is simulated with a trajectory of the missile you are talking about.. please make some sense...
 
.
You have scored a big zero on this! Ares has explained the concept very well. Read his reply!



While this is factually correct, it still falls in the rant catagory as it follows point 1.



The problem is you have no freakin idea about The swordfish radars used in Indian BMD program.:wave:


Swordfish is an Indian Long range tracking radar specifically developed to counter ballistic missile threat. First testing of this radar was in March 2009.

Main aim of the test was to validate the capabilities of the indigenously developed Swordfish Long Range Tracking Radar (LRTR). "The missile to be hit will be fired from a longer distance than it was in the earlier test. DRDO tested whether the radar could track the incoming missile from that distance or not" said a member of the project:azn:

Also, The Swordfish LRTR currently has a range of 600 km (370 mi)-800 km (500 mi) km range which the DRDO plans to upgrade to 1,500 km by 2011






This assumption is so childish that it doesn't even deserve a reply!:hitwall:



From these lines I now assume (no I infer) that you are a total fanboy and know Freakin nothing about BMD!

I don't know about the world but every sane member here on PDF is laughing at you!:lol:



Here comes the most Interesting bit,

How TF you assumed that the point of impact of the target missile was going to be the AAD launch site? The target missile was launched towards sea and was intercepted over the sea, not anywhere near the AAD launch point.:wave:

You also seem to forget that the range of AAD is 200km, so there goes your most interesting bit into the dust!


Report From The Hindu says---





All the points in bold prove the fallacy of your imaginary claims!:wave:





Now that your BS is exposed, it is time for you to stop being arrogant and go to your studies. Rants like above won't make it right, you know!

Kue time waste karte hoe baba... Faithful (claiming to be amerikan :lol:) and peaceful (claiming to be done Phd ),highly intelligent species in PDF.. :rofl:
 
. .
Then the test is not real life scenario then as decoys play a big part. In any case, US is having trouble with mid course ABM capability because of decoys. So that is why we might forget about this and go for boosting phase interceptor.

Decoys play a big part, when your enemy(read Pakistan) has them, our enemies don't even have MIRV yet.
Besides to deal with Decoys and MIRV.. you require a boost phases or Mid course interception (before the target release them), Which is being dealt in Phase 2 of this project with development of AD1 and AD2.
 
.
Congrats to India for a successful test. And thanks to America for providing much technical assistance.


You need to back such one liners with links, dude. Or your credibility will suffer (that is the "peaceful" way!;))

The only foreign component in the Indian BMD program was the Green Pine radar and the DRDO has not hidden this fact.

But that early stage has passed and we now have our own swordfish radar based on GP which is better than the original and an even better version will be tested this year.

Apart from that, this system is 100% Indian.


Prove it wrong with links or the LCA episode with you will be repeated. (remember you claiming the LCA is just an assembled plane :azn:)



You are wasting your time in cleaning his deposits. Its so obvious the so called "PHD guy" is simply ranting.

Yup! You have hit the nail on it's head. It was my last reply to that "peaceful" guy!
 
.
Congrats to India for a successful test. And thanks to America for providing much technical assistance.
Came back with ur rant again...
can u prove ur statement........?
i mean the second statement...
i know u couldn't bear the successful ABM test by India,so trying link it to Americans...such a cheap trick
Faithful,waiting for u proof....
If americans had a role,here they would spread it to the world...
if ur not a troll,please provide credible source for ur 1 liner....
waiting for ur reply
 
.
Everybody Please Report all the Faith'fuullls and peace'fuullls for trolling and ranting.
 
.
Congrats to India for a successful test. And thanks to America for providing much technical assistance.

American technical assistance?

The last what i"ve heard was America didn't allow Israeli Arrow missile sales to India,as they consisted of American technology.
 
.
Congrats
11030623360df8b90ff5fb6312.jpg



70km range, 16km height, Can A LCA fighter fly this high?

no offense, Only India take this as news. Chinese did that with improved HQ-2 in 1980's.
 
.
Congrats
11030623360df8b90ff5fb6312.jpg



70km range, 16km height, Can A LCA fighter fly this high?

no offense, Only India take this as news. Chinese did that with improved HQ-2 in 1980's.

Did Chinese intercept a ballistic missile in 1980s ? You do know a difference between a ballistic missile and an airplane?
Before this India has made four intercpetion ranging from 15 Km altitude to 80 Km altitude.

PS : AAD missile has a horizontal range of 200 Km and 30 Km vertical range.
 
.
Congrats


70km range, 16km height, Can A LCA fighter fly this high?

no offense, Only India take this as news. Chinese did that with improved HQ-2 in 1980's.

For India this is a news... we have done something... dont you think 70Km range and 16 Km height is not enough for terminal phase interception ?.. AAD is developed as a second level target interception if PDV failed to do so.. AAD is only for intercepting terminal phase missiles..

For LCA ... how can a fighter intercept a missile flying at Mach 7 and above?
 
.
Did Chinese intercept a ballistic missile in 1980s ? You do know a difference between a ballistic missile and an airplane?
Before this India has made four intercpetion ranging from 15 Km altitude to 80 Km altitude.

PS : AAD missile has a horizontal range of 200 Km and 30 Km vertical range.

How dare you ask that. These high IQ, PhD bearing Chinese know everything.
 
.
Came back with ur rant again...
can u prove ur statement........?
i mean the second statement...

Congrats
11030623360df8b90ff5fb6312.jpg



70km range, 16km height, Can A LCA fighter fly this high?

no offense, Only India take this as news. Chinese did that with improved HQ-2 in 1980's.

how LCA war plane come into ABM...????
are u trying to say that LCA should fire it missile and neutralize the ballistic missile...???
 
.
70km 16km , AAD apparently this time. India's S300 can do it perfectly.

This intercepter should flight a high-trajectory in this test (according to the intercepter's 300km range).The hypotenuse destance of interception may be just 20-25km.

Where is the India's PDV, and the kkv ?
That will be a real threaten thing. If India test it successfully.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom