Indian sarkari muslims blame Jinnah for their miseries

[El Sidd]

Game of thrones

But only the king of kings can sit upon the throne

 

[Psychic]

Those who chose to not only remain servile and put their trust in false promises of secularism and democracy and equality while also blaming and attacking those who actually made the right choice, today have no one but themselves to blame.

Sheikh Abdullah, a close friend of Nehru opted to become a part of the Indian Union. He had put his trust in the false promise of secularism and equality. The reason why he got along so well with Nehru was that both of them believed in secular values and that the Sheikh preferred a secular India over an Islamic Pakistan.
Jinnah visited Kashmir in 1944 where he received a royal welcome. Around 70,000 people gathered to listen to him in Srinagar. During this visit, Jinnah told Sheikh Abdullah that he had quit the Indian National Congress after seeing through it's secular facade. Jinnah warned him that the congress(Nehru) will “deceive you after its interests are met and you will repent one day.”
Jinnah was proven correct when Nehru threw Sheikh Abdullah in prison where he remained for 11 long years.

Honestly, this article sounds more like a anger-venting piece against Jinnah and Pakistanis for escaping the misery and oppression that would have been their fate too had they too remained silent, passive and weak.

Blaming Jinnah for what Hindus are doing to Indian Muslims is simply scapegoating and Pakistan-bashing, not sure if it's to display a image of patriotism to Hindus or what, but honestly it came off as pathetic and desperate.

What Jinnah did was the sensible and correct thing, and not to mention the Islamically correct thing; you really cant have two groups of people with often clashing beliefs and thus clashing interests coexisting in the same living space, especially when one of these groups is a minority and thus at a disadvantage vis a vis a vengeful (no love lost for centuries of Muslim rule) majority and at its mercy.

And partition also proves another thing, that despite people of the subcontinent being wrongly classified as the same we really are different. Why Muslims of North Subcontinent (now Pakistan) wanted partition while Indian Muslims chose to remain passive? This is why it is wrong to believe that same religion necessarily means same people and that racial, cultural and ethnic differences are therefore nullified and void.

Sure, one can call the British categorizing of some groups as "Martial Race" a tactic of favoritism and divide and conquer but I think there is a grain of truth to it as it so happens that the region's of the subcontinent where the most "warlike" and independent peoples inhabited ended up choosing independence rather than passivity.

1947 was the window of opportunity for everyone to choose their path of destiny. Those who chose to not only remain servile and put their trust in false promises of secularism and democracy and equality while also blaming and attacking those who actually made the right choice, today have no one but themselves to blame.

Also, just a point I think should be addressed; the author brought up certain things Jinnah might or might not have done in his personal life, even if they are true, and no human is perfect and yes that includes Muslims, it doesn't somehow lessen Jinnah for the good he did for the Muslims of this region who made the right choice and I believe the fruit of his efforts which saved millions of Muslims far outweighs any of his personal shortcomings which are between him and his Creator now.

@OsmanAli98 @Taimur Khurram @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @The Sandman @Indus Pakistan

Indian Muslims are 15% of the total population of India.

There are:
0.7% Muslim Parliamentarians
0.3% Muslim soldiers
0% Muslim in RAW
50% of the prison inmates are Muslims

In addition to being victims of cow lynchings and Jai Shri ram lynchings, they are stereotyped, harassed and economically strangulated yet they have chosen to remain subservient. They bash Pakistan and Jinnah in order to receive certificates of loyalty from the Hindu majority.

the author brought up certain things Jinnah might or might not have done in his personal life, even if they are true, and no human is perfect and yes that includes Muslims, it doesn't somehow lessen Jinnah for the good he did for the Muslims of this region who made the right choice and I believe the fruit of his efforts which saved millions of Muslims far outweighs any of his personal shortcomings which are between him and his Creator now.

For people like them, Gandhi and Nehru are more devout Muslims than Jinnah.

Jinnah had a change of heart. He was never the same Jinnah he used to be, he became the Quaid-e-Azam.
Jinnah was in favor of a Joint Hindu-Muslim effort for political rights. The architect of the Lucknow pact and given the title of "the ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity", he opposed the British policy of divide and rule. When he realized that these people are incorrigible, he became a true leader of the Muslims. The RSS had already come into existence in 1925. The shenanigans of the Congress to prevent the Muslims from attaining any power and control over the affairs of the country were visible to Jinnah but not to the myopic, delusional, imprudent and obstinate Muslim leaders of the Indian National Congress. Whatever has happened over the past 70 years or so has only vindicated the narrative of Jinnah. The Muslim League was also trying to tell the congressi Muslims that the majority will always subjugate the minority and especially in India where communal hatred and the popularity of extremist organizations like the RSS is on the rise. The Indian Muslims, on the other hand, chose to believe in the horseshit of equality, democracy, equal representation and secularism which was peddled by Gandhi, Nehru and Abul Kalam Azad. 4 million have been declared foreign immigrants in Assam, expecting many more to follow....

I also blame Jinnah.

I believe if we remained United, we would by now have become a Muslim country. With roughly 40 pc of the population we would have easily dictated the terms.

No.

We were not dictating anything when we actually were 40 percent of the population.
And this part of the sub-continent for most part of the history never related to Ganga, Jamuna and Brahmaputra either.

The person you supported was the one who ordered tanks in Hyderabad and Junagarh in addition to forcing the Nawab of Bhopal to accede.

 

[American Pakistani]

I'm thankful to almighty Allah and my ancestors who decided to move at the call of Jinnah (RA) to Pakistan so now I don't have to live to please anyone or get lynched just for eating beef.

 

[SIPRA]

I also blame Jinnah.

Quaid e Azam and Muslim League gave a political idea and narrative. It was ultimately the people, who were to make a decision, which they gave in 1945-46 central and provincial elections. For Central Assembly, Muslim League won all of 30 Muslim seats. In Provincial/State Assemblies, Muslim League won almost 90% of Muslim seats, throughout the British India. This was the prerogative of the people of that time, which they exercised. These results reflect that the idea of Pakistan had taken a deep root in the Muslim mind, even for those, who knew that they wouldn't be able to live in this country. Stop blaming Quaid e Azam.

 

[Mutakalim]

Their mullah brigade is the same as their secular battalion.

True, but only those Mullahs who are believers of this ideology. Those who didnt know the essence of Deen.


عجم ہنوز نداند رموز دیں، ورنہ۔۔۔
ز دیوبند حسین احمد! ایں چہ بوالعجبی است۔۔۔

سرود برسر منبر کہ ملت از وطن است۔۔
چہ بے خبر ز مقام محمد عربی است۔۔


سرود برسر منبر کہ ملت از وطن است۔۔ IMHO, This proposition was derived or been influenced by secularism.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Honestly, this article sounds more like a anger-venting piece against Jinnah and Pakistanis for escaping the misery and oppression that would have been their fate too had they too remained silent, passive and weak.

Blaming Jinnah for what Hindus are doing to Indian Muslims is simply scapegoating and Pakistan-bashing, not sure if it's to display a image of patriotism to Hindus or what, but honestly it came off as pathetic and desperate.

What Jinnah did was the sensible and correct thing, and not to mention the Islamically correct thing; you really cant have two groups of people with often clashing beliefs and thus clashing interests coexisting in the same living space, especially when one of these groups is a minority and thus at a disadvantage vis a vis a vengeful (no love lost for centuries of Muslim rule) majority and at its mercy.

And partition also proves another thing, that despite people of the subcontinent being wrongly classified as the same we really are different. Why Muslims of North Subcontinent (now Pakistan) wanted partition while Indian Muslims chose to remain passive? This is why it is wrong to believe that same religion necessarily means same people and that racial, cultural and ethnic differences are therefore nullified and void.

Sure, one can call the British categorizing of some groups as "Martial Race" a tactic of favoritism and divide and conquer but I think there is a grain of truth to it as it so happens that the region's of the subcontinent where the most "warlike" and independent peoples inhabited ended up choosing independence rather than passivity.

1947 was the window of opportunity for everyone to choose their path of destiny. Those who chose to not only remain servile and put their trust in false promises of secularism and democracy and equality while also blaming and attacking those who actually made the right choice, today have no one but themselves to blame.

Also, just a point I think should be addressed; the author brought up certain things Jinnah might or might not have done in his personal life, even if they are true, and no human is perfect and yes that includes Muslims, it doesn't somehow lessen Jinnah for the good he did for the Muslims of this region who made the right choice and I believe the fruit of his efforts which saved millions of Muslims far outweighs any of his personal shortcomings which are between him and his Creator now.

@OsmanAli98 @Taimur Khurram @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @The Sandman @Indus Pakistan

Great post brother. Excellent analysis.

Quaid e Azam and Muslim League gave a political idea and narrative. It was ultimately the people, who were to make a decision, which they gave in 1945-46 central and provincial elections. For Central Assembly, Muslim League won all of 30 Muslim seats. In Provincial/State Assemblies, Muslim League won almost 90% of Muslim seats, throughout the British India. This was the prerogative of the people of that time, which they exercised. These results reflect that the idea of Pakistan had taken a deep root in the Muslim mind, even for those, who knew that they wouldn't be able to live in this country. Stop blaming Quaid e Azam.

Muslims of the Northwest (and other places) exercised their genuine right to elect a government which fit their needs.

If Indian Muslim Congress puppets or Hindutva fascists want to complain, they should realize that the will of the people has spoken, and they knew full well their vote was for Pakistan.

How? Aren't they are all the same.

Indian Muslim Salafi, Ahle Hadith, Deobandi, Barelvi, Aligarh, Shia, Sufi Chisti, Qadiri, and Secular are all the same.

They all equally hate Pakistan/Kashmir, and are content with servitude to Hindu Right and Hindu Seculars.

I have never seen so much unity among any minority other than among Indian Muslims’ consensus about hating us.

 

[maximuswarrior]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1173522568025763840

@DESERT FIGHTER Check replies of the majority of Indian 'sarkari' Muslims.

@Desert Fox @MUSTAKSHAF @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan @Ocean

Burn you backstabbing Indian asslicking savages. You deserve RSS and RSS deserves you.

We have happy with Jinnah, you stay in India if you are so happy with them .. but if India Attacks Pakistan, we wont Differentiate between them and those Traitors when we bomb the crap out of them ..

To me Indian Muslims equal to RSS minions and vice versa. They are both equal enemies of Pakistan.

When it comes to it our job is very easy. We would vaporize them all without discriminating one or the other.

The great Jinnah rightly envisioned;
"Those who reject two-nation theory today, they and their generations will spend their lives proving loyalty to Hindu Majority India"
These scums can't understand what they have done to their most loyal dog "Farooq Abdullah" and Mehboba Mufti...... The more Hindus squeeze, lynch, Muslims the More Sarkari Muslims have to renounce Pakistan loudly like loyal dogs.....

LOL these Indian Muslims will always be third class servants of RSS pandit Brahmins. The Brahmin pandit will rape, kill and extort the Indian Muslim forever.

Just to add some more salt to their wounds we are going to taunt them and remind these backstabbing whores who opposed the creation of Pakistan of their daily miseries.

 

[YeBeWarned]

To me an Indian Muslims equals to RSS minion and vice versa. They are both equal enemies Pakistan.

When it comes to it our job js very easy. We would vaporize them all.

they are worse than leeches, they would probably never fit in Pakistani society as well, I have some relatives in Bhopal , i met some and experience their bigotry first hand , but one thing for sure they are dirty and smelly ..I Thank Allah everyday that my Grandparents on both sides make the right decision to move to Pakistan .

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

How? Aren't they are all the same.

JUI-H and Darul-aloom along with clerics of Rai Bareli have all pledged their allegiance to Delhi. JUI-H leader has condoned the abrogation of article 370. They are supporting the NRC as well.

1989 - Meerut riots
Indian Muslims: it's Jinnah's fault

1992 - Babri Masjid demolition
Indian Muslims: it's Jinnah's fault

2002 - Gujrat pogroms
Indian Muslims: it's Jinnah's fault

Present day- Lynchings + Detention camps
Indian Muslims: it's Jinnah's fault

2028 - Gas Chambers
Indian Muslims: it's Jinnah's fault

At the end of the day it's a mater of Fitret folks are born with!!! Can't help much!!! All praise, thanks and gratitude to HIM for Pak.....

 

[maximuswarrior]

they are worse than leeches, they would probably never fit in Pakistani society as well, I have some relatives in Bhopal , i met some and experience their bigotry first hand , but one thing for sure they are dirty and smelly ..I Thank Allah everyday that my Grandparents on both sides make the right decision to move to Pakistan .

They burn on the other side of the fence. They have no freedom and are treated like dogs. Their mosques are burnt down, their dignity is snatched from them, their bodies are hacked to bits and pieces, they are killed on mere suspicion of cow slaughter and the misery goes on. Even the Dalits have more rights than these savages.

You reap what you sow. I hope these bastards never find peace. An Indian Muslim is like a fvcking Afghan leper. Shunned by society and totally rejected. These people are cursed forever. Now they envy our freedom and nation. A big middle finger to the jealous cvnts. May misery be their best friend. Amen.

 

[YeBeWarned]

They burn on the other side of the fence. They have no freedom and are treated like dogs. Their mosques are burnt down, their dignity is snatched from them, their bodies are hacked to bits and pieces, they are killed on mere suspicion of cow slaughter and the misery goes on. Even the Dalits have more rights than these savages.

You reap what you sow. I hope these bastards never find peace. An Indian Muslim is like a fvcking Afghan leper. Shunned by society and totally rejected. These people are cursed forever. Now they envy our freedom and nation. A big middle finger to the jealous cvnts. May misery be their best friend. Amen.

It is like a Curse from Allah on them, they will suffer in that for a long time .. and as for beating , chant Jai Shri Ram , burnt mosques, women raped , and humiliated it is their fate , that is what you get to betray your fellow Muslims .

 

[maximuswarrior]

It is like a Curse from Allah on them, they will suffer in that for a long time .. and as for beating , chant Jai Shri Ram , burnt mosques, women raped , and humiliated it is their fate , that is what you get to betray your fellow Muslims .

Not an ounce of regret nor sympathy for the suffering of the hypocritical Indian Muslim. The Indian Mullah is a particular bastard. The Indian Mullah envies Pakistan's existence.

 

[maximuswarrior]

does this here look like a shia?
View attachment 579867

Look at the face of this fvcking reptile.

 

[Psychic]

True, but only those Mullahs who are believers of this ideology. Those who didnt know the essence of Deen.


عجم ہنوز نداند رموز دیں، ورنہ۔۔۔
ز دیوبند حسین احمد! ایں چہ بوالعجبی است۔۔۔

سرود برسر منبر کہ ملت از وطن است۔۔
چہ بے خبر ز مقام محمد عربی است۔۔


سرود برسر منبر کہ ملت از وطن است۔۔ IMHO, This proposition was derived or been influenced by secularism.

I don't speak Persian

 

[Rashid Mahmood]

All who decided to stay back after partition, did that on their own choice.
Pakistan was made for Muslims, whoever wanted to come.

Those who sacrificed their wealth and chose Pakistan got the chance and those who opted for wealth stayed back.

Why cry after 70 years. No one stopped them from coming even after partition.