arp2041
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,406
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
Yes I would trust a constitutional expert only if he had been INDEPENDENT which is not the case. The reason being that he is a representative lawyer for Central government. And moreover the previous SG had to resign because there were differences with law minister over various things. The following excerpt proves my point.
Nariman had resigned from the office on Monday allegedly over difference of opinion with the law minister Ashwini Kumar. Legally India Supreme Court postcard writer Court witness tweeted: “[Rohinton F Nariman], from what I gather, did not like being ordered around by someone whom he does not think is as good a lawyer as him.”
Source: ASG Parasaran to replace Rohinton Nariman as Solicitor General | Bar, Bench & Litigation | News | Editorial | Legally India
So the source does show that the SG is expected to tow the line with centre (at least for now).
Apart from that other sources such as former chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court, Mukul Mudgal, and lawyers PV Kapur, KN Bhatt and Pinaki Misra claim that there isn't any need for this bill to be shown to the central government. And moreover Former Congress government have passed 13 similar kind of bills with out the Central government's nod.
Source: “Sheila govt passed 13 Bills without Centre’s nod” - The Hindu
fair enough mate, you have made a good argument.
but sorry i can't trust your source for Sheila govt. passing those bills as it just says what AAP has said...............
Will appreciate if you can bring a neutral source.