Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

[Soumitra]

what exactly do you want to convey through this pic?

 

[The_Showstopper]

what exactly do you want to convey through this pic?

I think you are smart enough to understand my post...

 

[jha]

@jha; how much will Ram Kripal Yadav joining BJP will be beneficial for them in Bihar and UP???

Cant say about UP. In Bihar, Ramkripal Yadav will help in boosting Yadav votes ( and some Muslim votes in select constituencies ). He is going to win Patliputra Loksabha seat and his entry will give BJP huge advantage in 7-8 seats.

Ramkripal, Ramvilas and Upendra Kushwaha's entry has given a lot of confidence to BJP leaders and they are now talking about 35 out of 40. I however think they will get ~25. I would love to be proven wrong though.

 

[Parul]

Hey guys, I'm new here Not to PDF though,I've been following this forum for ages. A damn interesting thread I must say.

Welcome mate! Have you seen posts of @Bhai Zakir?

@fsayed a suggestion dude . Why don't you use a little less pics and a little more substance in your posts and people might actually start taking you seriously instead of calling you a bot

I agree with you on this!

 

[NKVD]

 

[Soumitra]

I think you are smart enough to understand my post...

Nopes. please put your complete argument in words.

Why is it that AAP and Cong supporters/bots just like to shoot and scoot by posting FB pics? Cant handle a debate with facts figures and words?

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Cant say about UP. In Bihar, Ramkripal Yadav will help in boosting Yadav votes ( and some Muslim votes in select constituencies ). He is going to win Patliputra Loksabha seat and his entry will give BJP huge advantage in 7-8 seats.

Ramkripal, Ramvilas and Upendra Kushwaha's entry has given a lot of confidence to BJP leaders and they are now talking about 35 out of 40. I however think they will get ~25. I would love to be proven wrong though.

Your take on UP & Bihar now? How much for BJP vs. chieftains?

 

[onu1886]

Welcome thmate! Have you seen posts of @Bhai Zakir?


Yup seen them . Crazy he was . What's with the photo chipkauing? PDF never used to be like this

 

[jha]

Meanwhile in Mamta Didi's rally in New Delhi.

Dont laugh so much.. She is a future ally and a "vote-cutter" in Delhi.

 

[NKVD]

Delhi High Court asks Centre to respond to PIL on funding to AAP - The Economic Times
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court today asked the Centre to file its response to a PIL seeking registration of a criminal case against Aam Aadmi Party alleging that it received foreign funding in violation of various laws.

"Let Respondent no. 1 (Ministry of Home Affairs) file a counter affidavit within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed two weeks thereafter," a bench of Acting Chief Justice B D Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul said.

The bench also rejected the submission of advocate M L Sharma that the bank accounts of the party, which is still receiving donations from NRIs, be confiscated.

Sharma, who had filed the PIL, submitted that his petition was earlier heard several times by another bench and, hence, it has wrongly been listed before this court.

"According to the counsel for respondents, no hearing, as such, has taken place. This matter is listed before this bench according to the roster," the bench said, adding that no lawyer has "got control over the registry of this court".

The bench, which will now hear the matter on May 7, also said that former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP founding members including senior advocate Shanti Bhushan need not file replies to the PIL as no notices were issued to them.

Earlier, AAP had filed its reply saying it did not flout any law in receiving foreign funds and the party got donations worth Rs 30 crore from Indian citizens only, out which about Rs 8.5 crore came from NRIs.

"It is the only party whose all financial records and the names of each and every donor is on its website, open for public view," the affidavit, filed by AAP national secretary Pankaj Kumar Gupta, had said and sought dismissal of the PIL.

Earlier, the court had issued notices to AAP on the plea. Besides Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan, petitioner advocate M L Sharma has made AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Shanti Bhushan as parties in his PIL.

Sharma, in his plea, had cited some names, including that of Kejriwal, and sought that "a direction be issued to register a criminal case against the respondents (AAP members) under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) and to conduct day-to-day trial proceedings under court supervision in the interest of justice."

AAP leaders gave no details of foreign funding, Centre tells High Court : Delhi, News - India Today

 

[JanjaWeed]

Guys.. it's going to be fun. Amar Singh is back in political discussions!

 

[The_Showstopper]

Nopes. please put your complete argument in words.

Why is it that AAP and Cong supporters/bots just like to shoot and scoot by posting FB pics? Cant handle a debate with facts figures and words?

Ok I shall elaborate for you. The GEER foundation whose chairman is Modi also received money from Ford foundation. So accusing AK for relationship with Ford by BJP looks more of a hypocrisy.

Source: GEER website & Fordfoundation.org
http://www.fordfoundation.org/pdfs/library/ar2002.pdf

 

[jha]

Your take on UP & Bihar now? How much for BJP vs. chieftains?

UP :

BJP+ : 35-45
SP : 7-10
BSP : 7-10
Congress : 5-8
RLD : 2-3
AAP : 1-2

Bihar :

BJP+ : 25-28
JD-U : 5-8
RJD+ : 5-8
Ind : 1-2

Jharkhand :

BJP+ : 8-12
Congress+RJD+ : 2-4
Others : 2-4

 

[Soumitra]

@all Let us define some rules of engagement specifically for this thread. We should not accept only a pic or cartoonish video as a cogent argument. the person who submits a pic /video should also define in words what exactly is his argument.

If he is giving some numbers (growth rate/malnutriion/poverty etc) he should also back them by giving the reliable source of the data.

This will lead to a more reasoned and enlightening debate.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Delhi High Court asks Centre to respond to PIL on funding to AAP - The Economic Times
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court today asked the Centre to file its response to a PIL seeking registration of a criminal case against Aam Aadmi Party alleging that it received foreign funding in violation of various laws.

"Let Respondent no. 1 (Ministry of Home Affairs) file a counter affidavit within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed two weeks thereafter," a bench of Acting Chief Justice B D Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul said.

The bench also rejected the submission of advocate M L Sharma that the bank accounts of the party, which is still receiving donations from NRIs, be confiscated.

Sharma, who had filed the PIL, submitted that his petition was earlier heard several times by another bench and, hence, it has wrongly been listed before this court.

"According to the counsel for respondents, no hearing, as such, has taken place. This matter is listed before this bench according to the roster," the bench said, adding that no lawyer has "got control over the registry of this court".

The bench, which will now hear the matter on May 7, also said that former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP founding members including senior advocate Shanti Bhushan need not file replies to the PIL as no notices were issued to them.

Earlier, AAP had filed its reply saying it did not flout any law in receiving foreign funds and the party got donations worth Rs 30 crore from Indian citizens only, out which about Rs 8.5 crore came from NRIs.

"It is the only party whose all financial records and the names of each and every donor is on its website, open for public view," the affidavit, filed by AAP national secretary Pankaj Kumar Gupta, had said and sought dismissal of the PIL.

Earlier, the court had issued notices to AAP on the plea. Besides Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan, petitioner advocate M L Sharma has made AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Shanti Bhushan as parties in his PIL.

Sharma, in his plea, had cited some names, including that of Kejriwal, and sought that "a direction be issued to register a criminal case against the respondents (AAP members) under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) and to conduct day-to-day trial proceedings under court supervision in the interest of justice."

The court just asks Centre to investigate the source of funds of AAP after a PIL was filed. So where has it blamed or convicted AAP. Its the PIL which claims so and not the court.