Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.
- Thread starter Hyde
- Start date
JanjaWeed
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,772
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Yeh rocket science nahi hai.. pocket science hai! Abhi to BJP hi mai baap bannewala hai! Goa mai bhi aur Delhi mai bhi.But I wonder how such article got published in Congress mouthpiece Tehelka ???
Last edited:
walwal
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
U mean Tejpal in Goa prison underwent a Conversion from Secularist to a hindutvavadi...
We must start a Media saffronising Drive... Then only Hindu Nationalism can Become Political Ideology of Average Indian...
Saffronisation of Education should be next on the card...
Hindu Rashtra in 15 years that must be out covert target ...
If I have to take the statement in literal sense, I would be afraid. I certainly dont belong to the pseudos who are currently looming all over; but at the same time dont want those fringe groups to take the charge and create chaos.
GreenFoe
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,306
- Reaction score
- -7
Aamir khan says don't give majority to BJP, he will try his level best via covert messaging to stop BJP and try to show that AAP-Congress alliance show be given some seats.
BJP must return him the favor after elections.
BJP must return him the favor after elections.
Nair saab
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Then U dont know our aim and why RSS and BJP was established ...
We want to bring Hindu Rashtra by conversation not by confrontation ... BJP is the political weapon that we will use for this political Change ...
We want India to that which is Israel for Jews... Only Nation which Buddhist , Jains, Sikh and Hindus can live without the fear of persecution ... a country to represent them... A Homeland for 1 billion + population ... thats about 1 in every 7 person in this world.
Countries with Christian population...
Countries with Muslim population...
And countries with Hindu population...
Now tell which county would re-represent us Hindus , Jains, Sikhs and Bhuddhist... all of which originated in India ... and which is now the last resort of US... no other country in this world would accept us 1 billion + population as theirs ... where would we go if we even loose India...
We will face a huge Refugee problem of a population of poor , illiterate ethic Indians who no other country is ready to accept if in case we loose India....
Jason bourne
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
- Messages
- 2,771
- Reaction score
- 0
Top cop kiran bedi to join BJP .......unconfirmed news .
GreenFoe
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2013
- Messages
- 1,306
- Reaction score
- -7
don't underestimate your enemy ,congress is in power for 60years,it knows the tricks
This is a better article
Usual Suspects: CONG MAKING PLANS TO TRIP UP NEXT PM
kurup
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2012
- Messages
- 10,563
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
If true ...another of my dream will come true.
NKVD
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2013
- Messages
- 5,157
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
fsayed
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,606
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
You are here: Home ∼ Gujarat Riots: A Desperate Email for Help and Gujarat Police’s Inaction
Gujarat Riots: A Desperate Email for Help and Gujarat Police’s Inaction
Pratik Sinha October 12, 2013 | 4 Responses
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) received a desperate email on 28th February 2002 at 2:44 p.m. that the police was not helping the victims but, on the contrary were actually with the rampaging mobs. The NHRC took notice and gave a suo moto notice to the Director General of Police, Government of Gujarat annexing the email received by them from a Muslim resident of Ahmedabad.
Email to NHRC on 28th February 2002 at 2:44 p.m.
From: kadrishadab@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:44:12 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Regarding attrocities over minority in ahmedabad
To: nhrc3@alpha.nic.in
Respected Sir,
As u know that VHP has called band over here and they are now burning muslims shops and have killed 10 and surprisingly police is supporting them. According to one of the big muslim leader when he asked Commissioner of ahmedabad mr p c pandey to take action to stop this he said that it is not in his hands.
Sir we are in great danger and are being covered from all four sides andanytime they may enter with police..our lives are in danger and if nothing is done then till evening there can be a big loss of lives.
please sir do whatever u can do
syed shadabhussain
The Gujarat Government however did not reply to the notice though 3 days were given to them and later on sent a reply to NHRC by it’s covering letter dated May 28th 2002. The defense was that the police resorted to heavy firing at Ahmedabad to prevent the rioters from killing the Muslims on 28th February and 1st February. Shockingly the numbers cited by the Gujarat Government in the same reply are exactly to the contrary which shows the deaths in police firing as under:
Hindu and Muslim Deaths in Police Firing in 2002 Gujarat Riots
DateHinduMuslim
Total3436
27th February 200202
28th February 2002107
1st March 20022427
It would shock and surprise people that even in the 2 days i.e. 28th February and 1st March when even websites like Narendra Modi sponsored GujaratRiots.com admit that huge rampaging mobs were on the streets attacking the Muslim houses and killing the happless Muslims and by their own count 600 Muslims were killed on these 2 days,the police had actually killed as many Muslims in the police firing as Hindus. Such an official figure flies in the face of the defense of the Modi Government that police force was effectively defending the Muslims from the rampaging Hindu mobs. In fact the figures show that police were actually firing and killing the Muslims and as evidence has shown in Naroda Patiya, where the young Muslim boys who had stood at the gate of Naroda Patiya to defend their locality by preventing the mob from entering through the only gate of Naroda Patiya were actually shot and killed by the police facilitating the entry inside the Naroda Patiya and thereby killing around 100 Muslims. These are all documented facts in the Naroda Patiya Judgement in which over 30 people were convicted including Modi’s minister Mayaben Kodnani and Babu Bajrangi.
In light of these official records of police firing, the email that we have displayed here actually tells us the contemporaneous truth of 28th February 2002.
#India -People Of Gujarat Will Bear The Brunt Of The Modi-Adani Nexus
Posted by :kamayani bali mahabal On : November 10, 2013
0
Category:Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights
Tags:adani, Gujarat, India, Modi
by Rajeev Kumar ( rajeev.kumar@gulail.com)
Gautam Adani , Chairman Adani’s Group
To meet its power requirement, the Gujarat Government had signed a deal withAdani Power Ltd. (APL) on February 6, 2006 to buy 1000 megawatts of electricity at the expensive rate of Rs. 2.89 per unit. This move is set to incur losses worth Rs. 24,000 crores and will be placed upon the people of Gujarat over the next 25 years. The pact in itself is full of serious irregularities. To remove PTC India Ltd. from the deal, the state government went to the Supreme Court. But when it did not get relief even there, it took the support of technical errors and kept PTC out of the pact. This is yet another proof of Adani and Modi’s complicity, which has already been exposed byGulail.
Also Read: Adani-Modi nexus to cost 23,625 cr
We now know how the Modi government benefited Adani in the garb of losing out to him. The first chapter of this alliance begins with the second Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) of 1000 megawatts signed between GUVNL and Adani Power Ltd. The supply of electricity in this was fixed at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit. This agreement took place on February 2, 2006 – four days prior to the PPA of Rs. 2.89 per unit. The intentions of the Gujarat government first came under doubt here because if the government was getting electricity at the rate of Rs 2.35 per unit, then why did it sign the PPA at the rate of Rs 2.89 per unit four days later?
The force behind this was the equation shared by Adani and Modi, which made an ordinary businessman a billionaire. The coordination between the two did not end here. The Modi government and Adani played several other games to mislead the public. Adani initially signed the 1000 megawatts PPA at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit but later felt that the deal was a loss. It seemed a better prospect to cancel the deal. It would have to pay some crores of rupees as compensation but it was more important to concoct a plausible reason for cancelling the deal. Here, it again needed Gujarat government’s help and Modi was ready to extend help. Together, they hatched a plan to restrict the supply of coal so that Adani could get a chance to go to the GERC (Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission).
The second scheme of the state government began thereafter which aimed to remove Adani from the PPA of Rs. 2.35 per unit. APL had signed an MoU with the state-owned Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (GMDC). As per the rules of the MoU, GMDC had to supply coal to APL through the coal block (Morega 2) inChhattisgarh, which the former had received from the Centre.
GMDC refused to provide coal to Adani. It is interesting to note that a company of Gujarat Government refused to sell coal to another company, which was responsible for producing electricity and selling it back to the Gujarat government.
Politics lay behind this move as well. The state government could go to any extent to benefit Adani. Now, when Adani wanted to get out of this PPA, he could be helped by restricting the supply of coal so that APL could get an excuse to terminate the agreement. GMDC refused to give coal to APL and Adani got the escape clause to go to GERC.
Adani had got an opportunity to terminate the PPA of selling power at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit because GMDC was not supplying coal. This move by Adani and Modi, however, was unsuccessful.
APL sent a notice to the state’s electrical services umbrella company Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL) on December 28, 2009, almost three years after the PPA documents were first signed on February 2, 2007. There lay a scheme behind this. The PPA was signed on February 2, 2007 but as per the agreement, Adani had to supply electricity from January 4, 2010. Just five days before the supply date, APL told GUVNL that it was terminating the agreement of electricity supply. Such a company, which terminated a contract just five days before the supply was to begin, should have been blacklisted. But the Gujarat government did nothing of the sort.
They opted for an easy way out, that is going to the GERC. If it had not taken even this step, its pilferage would have been detected; it would have been exposed and the Opposition party would have raised a hue and cry over the issue. That is why, GUVNL had to go to GERC. But here too, Adani and Modi’s move backfired.
GERC ruled in favour of GUVNL. The regulatory body said GUVNL had signed a 1000 megawatt PPA with APL in which the responsibility of arranging coal supply lay with Adani. If GMDC did not provide coal to APL, it could not be the basis of terminating the PPA because it was not mentioned in the agreement that the supply of electricity would stop after the MoU between GMDC and APL came to an end. This was a shock for both Adani and the Gujarat government which had taken this step for the benefit of the former but its scheme was rendered unsuccessful.
The next option available to APL was to appeal against the GERC order in the Appellate Tribunal For Electricity as it wanted to get out of the PPA at all costs. Once again then the process of bidding could be initiated and it could sign a new agreement for supplying electricity at higher rates.
Adani Power used this alternative and approached the Appellate Tribunal. But there too, it faced failure when the Tribunal affirmed GERC’s decision. APL filed a review petition after the order by the Appellate Tribunal but even this time, the tribunal decided in favour of GUVNL and re-affirmed that there was no error in its previous decision.
Gujarat Riots: A Desperate Email for Help and Gujarat Police’s Inaction
Pratik Sinha October 12, 2013 | 4 Responses
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) received a desperate email on 28th February 2002 at 2:44 p.m. that the police was not helping the victims but, on the contrary were actually with the rampaging mobs. The NHRC took notice and gave a suo moto notice to the Director General of Police, Government of Gujarat annexing the email received by them from a Muslim resident of Ahmedabad.
Email to NHRC on 28th February 2002 at 2:44 p.m.
From: kadrishadab@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:44:12 +0530 (IST)
Subject: Regarding attrocities over minority in ahmedabad
To: nhrc3@alpha.nic.in
Respected Sir,
As u know that VHP has called band over here and they are now burning muslims shops and have killed 10 and surprisingly police is supporting them. According to one of the big muslim leader when he asked Commissioner of ahmedabad mr p c pandey to take action to stop this he said that it is not in his hands.
Sir we are in great danger and are being covered from all four sides andanytime they may enter with police..our lives are in danger and if nothing is done then till evening there can be a big loss of lives.
please sir do whatever u can do
syed shadabhussain
The Gujarat Government however did not reply to the notice though 3 days were given to them and later on sent a reply to NHRC by it’s covering letter dated May 28th 2002. The defense was that the police resorted to heavy firing at Ahmedabad to prevent the rioters from killing the Muslims on 28th February and 1st February. Shockingly the numbers cited by the Gujarat Government in the same reply are exactly to the contrary which shows the deaths in police firing as under:
Hindu and Muslim Deaths in Police Firing in 2002 Gujarat Riots
DateHinduMuslim
Total3436
27th February 200202
28th February 2002107
1st March 20022427
It would shock and surprise people that even in the 2 days i.e. 28th February and 1st March when even websites like Narendra Modi sponsored GujaratRiots.com admit that huge rampaging mobs were on the streets attacking the Muslim houses and killing the happless Muslims and by their own count 600 Muslims were killed on these 2 days,the police had actually killed as many Muslims in the police firing as Hindus. Such an official figure flies in the face of the defense of the Modi Government that police force was effectively defending the Muslims from the rampaging Hindu mobs. In fact the figures show that police were actually firing and killing the Muslims and as evidence has shown in Naroda Patiya, where the young Muslim boys who had stood at the gate of Naroda Patiya to defend their locality by preventing the mob from entering through the only gate of Naroda Patiya were actually shot and killed by the police facilitating the entry inside the Naroda Patiya and thereby killing around 100 Muslims. These are all documented facts in the Naroda Patiya Judgement in which over 30 people were convicted including Modi’s minister Mayaben Kodnani and Babu Bajrangi.
In light of these official records of police firing, the email that we have displayed here actually tells us the contemporaneous truth of 28th February 2002.
#India -People Of Gujarat Will Bear The Brunt Of The Modi-Adani Nexus
Posted by :kamayani bali mahabal On : November 10, 2013
0
Category:Advocacy, Announcements, Human Rights, Justice, Kractivism, Law, Minority Rights
Tags:adani, Gujarat, India, Modi
by Rajeev Kumar ( rajeev.kumar@gulail.com)
Gautam Adani , Chairman Adani’s Group
To meet its power requirement, the Gujarat Government had signed a deal withAdani Power Ltd. (APL) on February 6, 2006 to buy 1000 megawatts of electricity at the expensive rate of Rs. 2.89 per unit. This move is set to incur losses worth Rs. 24,000 crores and will be placed upon the people of Gujarat over the next 25 years. The pact in itself is full of serious irregularities. To remove PTC India Ltd. from the deal, the state government went to the Supreme Court. But when it did not get relief even there, it took the support of technical errors and kept PTC out of the pact. This is yet another proof of Adani and Modi’s complicity, which has already been exposed byGulail.
Also Read: Adani-Modi nexus to cost 23,625 cr
We now know how the Modi government benefited Adani in the garb of losing out to him. The first chapter of this alliance begins with the second Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) of 1000 megawatts signed between GUVNL and Adani Power Ltd. The supply of electricity in this was fixed at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit. This agreement took place on February 2, 2006 – four days prior to the PPA of Rs. 2.89 per unit. The intentions of the Gujarat government first came under doubt here because if the government was getting electricity at the rate of Rs 2.35 per unit, then why did it sign the PPA at the rate of Rs 2.89 per unit four days later?
The force behind this was the equation shared by Adani and Modi, which made an ordinary businessman a billionaire. The coordination between the two did not end here. The Modi government and Adani played several other games to mislead the public. Adani initially signed the 1000 megawatts PPA at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit but later felt that the deal was a loss. It seemed a better prospect to cancel the deal. It would have to pay some crores of rupees as compensation but it was more important to concoct a plausible reason for cancelling the deal. Here, it again needed Gujarat government’s help and Modi was ready to extend help. Together, they hatched a plan to restrict the supply of coal so that Adani could get a chance to go to the GERC (Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission).
The second scheme of the state government began thereafter which aimed to remove Adani from the PPA of Rs. 2.35 per unit. APL had signed an MoU with the state-owned Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (GMDC). As per the rules of the MoU, GMDC had to supply coal to APL through the coal block (Morega 2) inChhattisgarh, which the former had received from the Centre.
GMDC refused to provide coal to Adani. It is interesting to note that a company of Gujarat Government refused to sell coal to another company, which was responsible for producing electricity and selling it back to the Gujarat government.
Politics lay behind this move as well. The state government could go to any extent to benefit Adani. Now, when Adani wanted to get out of this PPA, he could be helped by restricting the supply of coal so that APL could get an excuse to terminate the agreement. GMDC refused to give coal to APL and Adani got the escape clause to go to GERC.
Adani had got an opportunity to terminate the PPA of selling power at the rate of Rs. 2.35 per unit because GMDC was not supplying coal. This move by Adani and Modi, however, was unsuccessful.
APL sent a notice to the state’s electrical services umbrella company Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL) on December 28, 2009, almost three years after the PPA documents were first signed on February 2, 2007. There lay a scheme behind this. The PPA was signed on February 2, 2007 but as per the agreement, Adani had to supply electricity from January 4, 2010. Just five days before the supply date, APL told GUVNL that it was terminating the agreement of electricity supply. Such a company, which terminated a contract just five days before the supply was to begin, should have been blacklisted. But the Gujarat government did nothing of the sort.
They opted for an easy way out, that is going to the GERC. If it had not taken even this step, its pilferage would have been detected; it would have been exposed and the Opposition party would have raised a hue and cry over the issue. That is why, GUVNL had to go to GERC. But here too, Adani and Modi’s move backfired.
GERC ruled in favour of GUVNL. The regulatory body said GUVNL had signed a 1000 megawatt PPA with APL in which the responsibility of arranging coal supply lay with Adani. If GMDC did not provide coal to APL, it could not be the basis of terminating the PPA because it was not mentioned in the agreement that the supply of electricity would stop after the MoU between GMDC and APL came to an end. This was a shock for both Adani and the Gujarat government which had taken this step for the benefit of the former but its scheme was rendered unsuccessful.
The next option available to APL was to appeal against the GERC order in the Appellate Tribunal For Electricity as it wanted to get out of the PPA at all costs. Once again then the process of bidding could be initiated and it could sign a new agreement for supplying electricity at higher rates.
Adani Power used this alternative and approached the Appellate Tribunal. But there too, it faced failure when the Tribunal affirmed GERC’s decision. APL filed a review petition after the order by the Appellate Tribunal but even this time, the tribunal decided in favour of GUVNL and re-affirmed that there was no error in its previous decision.
Last edited:
SwAggeR
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 2,991
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Link for that.
If this is true then I won't watch his movie from now and expect every BJP supporter to do same.
arp2041
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2012
- Messages
- 10,406
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
Mate, we aren't living in a dictatorship, everyone is entitled to his/her opinion.
He is just saying what he thinks should be done, he is not forcing anyone to not vote for BJP.
It's a test - People vote by what public figure says or they vote for what they think is RIGHT?
Similar threads
