Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

[Joe Shearer]

Why do you think so?

I think this can be interesting.

Let the Hindus respond, I want to read more about this and nail their lies. May be open a thread on this. Lets see.

HEY!

I'm a Hindu. I'm not a bigot, if that's what you mean.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

HEY!

I'm a Hindu. I'm not a bigot, if that's what you mean.

Sure. I know.

Let THEM respond. You know who I mean.

 

[xeuss]

Why do you think so?

I think this can be interesting.

Let the Hindus respond, I want to read more about this and nail their lies. May be open a thread on this. Lets see.

This is pointless.

They believe anonymous whatsapp forwards rather than scholarly works by professionals. Why? Because they want to believe all the lies, as long as those lies show Muslims as the bad guy.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

This is pointless.

They believe anonymous whatsapp forwards rather than scholarly works by professionals. Why? Because they want to believe all the lies, as long as those lies show Muslims as the bad guy.

Still.

I would love to read what they have to say. Mental gymnastics are fun to watch.

 

[xeuss]

Still.

I would love to read what they have to say. Mental gymnastics are fun to watch.

They'll slink away and come back with..."What about the Kashmiri Pandits"

 

[AfrazulMandal]

"What about the Kashmiri Pandits"

These were another group of Class A Islamophobes and bigots. for the vast majority of Pandits, not a day goes by without bad mouthing Islam or Muslims.

 

[Naofumi]

What's the source of this Princess rape story?

 

[Soumitra]

What's the source of this Princess rape story?

No source. @Joe Shearer pulled the story from where the sun doesn't shine. @xeuss and @AfrazulMandal are just basking in the reflected glory of their "intellectual" big brother. such a fantastical tale. Nobody can prove or disprove it. I am saying nothing of this sort happened. They will obviously say I got it from "Whatsapp University". I have been debating with Islamists and Leftists for more than a decade. This is the very first time I have heard of this story of "Rape of a rajput princess"

At the height of Ram Janambhumi struggle there was a slogan "Ayodhya to Jhanki hai,Kashi Mathura baaki hai" None of the leftists or Islamists ever countered the demand to restore the temple at Gyanvapi mosque with this claim. Suddenly on 15th May 2020 @AfrazulMandal wakes up and makes this claim. But here is a funny thing he doesn't begin by this claim. He initially says

Syncretic culture.

Big deal.

Which is perfectly in line with his worldview that Hindus must make way for Muslims

When @pothead countered him

As long as it's a temple thats destroyed and desecreated - it's beautiful.
Let's try the same with some of YOUR religious structures....

Anyway, your post in a nutshell is Indian secularism & why have completely stopped believing your kind.

he suddenly invented this story

It is not fake.

The temple was removed because some pujari of the temple violated a princess in Aurangzeb's procession.

Then his brother in arm @xeuss embellishes the story

More specifically, a Nepali Hindu princess. Aurangzeb had lodged her at the Vishwanath mandir when passing through the city. He thought a Hindu temple of the highest respect would be most suitable for a Hindu princess of royal blood.

Then the big brother comes to defend the little brother with the tale of the Rajput Princess

Now you may say that "Hey you are a Sanghi, we will not believe you." See it is impossible to prove a negative. But I have an impeccable source - Audrey Truschke

She is a leftist "historian" and one of the biggest fan girls of Auragzeb. She has written a biography of Auragzeb where she has whitewashed him.

She spends the whole day fighting "Sanghi Trolls" on twitter and keeps on saying how great Aurangzeb is.

I went to her twitter timeline to see if she ever mentioned this tale and I found zilch

The biggest defender of Aurangzeb and his biographer has never mentioned this tale and you expect me to believe it just because of 15th May 2020 @Joe Shearer @AfrazulMandal and @xeuss pulled something fromup their @$$

 

[xeuss]

No source. @Joe Shearer pulled the story from where the sun doesn't shine. @xeuss and @AfrazulMandal are just basking in the reflected glory of their "intellectual" big brother. such a fantastical tale. Nobody can prove or disprove it. I am saying nothing of this sort happened. They will obviously say I got it from "Whatsapp University". I have been debating with Islamists and Leftists for more than a decade. This is the very first time I have heard of this story of "Rape of a rajput princess"

At the height of Ram Janambhumi struggle there was a slogan "Ayodhya to Jhanki hai,Kashi Mathura baaki hai" None of the leftists or Islamists ever countered the demand to restore the temple at Gyanvapi mosque with this claim. Suddenly on 15th May 2020 @AfrazulMandal wakes up and makes this claim. But here is a funny thing he doesn't begin by this claim. He initially says



Which is perfectly in line with his worldview that Hindus must make way for Muslims

When @pothead countered him



he suddenly invented this story




Then his brother in arm @xeuss embellishes the story


Then the big brother comes to defend the little brother with the tale of the Rajput Princess

Now you may say that "Hey you are a Sanghi, we will not believe you." See it is impossible to prove a negative. But I have an impeccable source - Audrey Truschke

She is a leftist "historian" and one of the biggest fan girls of Auragzeb. She has written a biography of Auragzeb where she has whitewashed him.

She spends the whole day fighting "Sanghi Trolls" on twitter and keeps on saying how great Aurangzeb is.

I went to her twitter timeline to see if she ever mentioned this tale and I found zilch

View attachment 632646

The biggest defender of Aurangzeb and his biographer has never mentioned this tale and you expect me to believe it just because of 15th May 2020 @Joe Shearer @AfrazulMandal and @xeuss pulled something fromup their @$$

One thing good that came out of all this is that a Sanghi used Audrey Trushcke as a reference. It's a start. Perhaps spend more time on her articles and see what else she wrote.

 

[Soumitra]

One thing good that came out of all this is that a Sanghi used Audrey Trushcke as a reference. It's a start. Perhaps spend more time on her articles and see what else she wrote.

I used a leftist Islamist to puncture a false claim by another leftist Islamist. she is just a tool - use and throw

 

[AfrazulMandal]

No source. @Joe Shearer pulled the story from where the sun doesn't shine. @xeuss and @AfrazulMandal are just basking in the reflected glory of their "intellectual" big brother. such a fantastical tale. Nobody can prove or disprove it. I am saying nothing of this sort happened. They will obviously say I got it from "Whatsapp University". I have been debating with Islamists and Leftists for more than a decade. This is the very first time I have heard of this story of "Rape of a rajput princess"

At the height of Ram Janambhumi struggle there was a slogan "Ayodhya to Jhanki hai,Kashi Mathura baaki hai" None of the leftists or Islamists ever countered the demand to restore the temple at Gyanvapi mosque with this claim. Suddenly on 15th May 2020 @AfrazulMandal wakes up and makes this claim. But here is a funny thing he doesn't begin by this claim. He initially says



Which is perfectly in line with his worldview that Hindus must make way for Muslims

When @pothead countered him



he suddenly invented this story




Then his brother in arm @xeuss embellishes the story


Then the big brother comes to defend the little brother with the tale of the Rajput Princess

Now you may say that "Hey you are a Sanghi, we will not believe you." See it is impossible to prove a negative. But I have an impeccable source - Audrey Truschke

She is a leftist "historian" and one of the biggest fan girls of Auragzeb. She has written a biography of Auragzeb where she has whitewashed him.

She spends the whole day fighting "Sanghi Trolls" on twitter and keeps on saying how great Aurangzeb is.

I went to her twitter timeline to see if she ever mentioned this tale and I found zilch

View attachment 632646

The biggest defender of Aurangzeb and his biographer has never mentioned this tale and you expect me to believe it just because of 15th May 2020 @Joe Shearer @AfrazulMandal and @xeuss pulled something fromup their @$$

Relax.

Please do me a favor.

Can you tag all the Hindus here. I will open a thread and we can discuss this there.

Sounds fair?

 

[xeuss]

I used a leftist Islamist to puncture a false claim by another leftist Islamist. she is just a tool - use and throw

I haven't read Audrey's book on Aurangzeb, so not sure if it is mentioned there.

But this story has been around, with minor variations in the details. Google it and you will find it as well.

But you should read Audrey's works. It is scholarly, so that might be a problem for you.

 

[Soumitra]

Relax.

Please do me a favor.

Can you tag all the Hindus here. I will open a thread and we can discuss this there.

Sounds fair?

Do what you want. You want a leftist Islamist circle j**k be my guest.

 

[Naofumi]

I haven't read Audrey's book on Aurangzeb, so not sure if it is mentioned there.

But this story has been around, with minor variations in the details. Google it and you will find it as well.

But you should read Audrey's works. It is scholarly, so that might be a problem for you.

I found this one only - Koenraad Elst (Hindutva ideologue) debunking it by claiming the root source was Molvi from Kashi, is there any refutation to Elst?
https://arisebharat.com/2017/03/09/why-did-aurangzeb-demolish-the-kashi-vishvanath/

 

[Naofumi]

She says it's in her book though

https://twitter.com/x/status/884020681817686017