Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

[Vishwabalas]

What do you mean?

Times now appeals to the lowest denominator. It targets and abuses India and Indians.

Al Jazeera like the BBC is more sophisticated and targets Non muslims and Non Arabs for its "atrocity literature" and targets a higher social and intellectual class.

Dude where did you get that Newspaper clipping from this thread
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indian-political-corner-all-updates-discussions.281816/page-3877
Post no 58145

Does that really matter ? its the truth. Its not Photoshop.

Maybe because of this?
Enough of statues at public places, Supreme Court tells States

http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...supreme-court-tells-states/article4319470.ece

You are just defending the indefensible.

In Rajasthan, the muslims did not permit Hindus to install a Hindu statute on a Hindu structure which was removed for renovation.

They rioted to ensure that it does not happen.

While in Maharashtra the govt. is indulging in "muslim appeasement" by seeking their "permission" before installing any statute.

If you are unable to see the Facts for what they are, there is no point in talking further. Feel free to point to the SC on a totally unrelated matter and pretend "all is well".

 

[ranjeet]

You are just defending the indefensible.

In Rajasthan, the muslims did not permit Hindus to install a Hindu statute on a Hindu structure which was removed for renovation.

They rioted to ensure that it does not happen.

While in Maharashtra the govt. is indulging in "muslim appeasement" by seeking their "permission" before installing any statute.

If you are unable to see the Facts for what they are, there is no point in talking further. Feel free to point to the SC on a totally unrelated matter and pretend "all is well".

I am not defending anything, What happened in Rajasthan was a communal incident whereas in Fadnavis case it's a Supreme Court from 2005 being followed.

Here

https://twitter.com/x/status/860417767966613504

 

[Vishwabalas]

I am not defending anything, What happened in Rajasthan was a communal incident whereas in Fadnavis case it's a Supreme Court from 2005 being followed.

Here

https://twitter.com/x/status/860417767966613504

Sadly you are mistaken and so is that chap on twitter.

THIS is the SC order you are referring to. Do you see anything about seeking "minority" permission ?

http://kmc.up.nic.in/PDF_Files/others/SC orders regarding construction of statue in public places.pdf


Read this for further clarity on this issue,

http://www.opindia.com/2017/05/in-m...en-on-your-private-land-if-minorities-object/

"....However, the 2005 policy did not require explicit ‘no objection’ from minorities, rather it said that the wishes of minorities should be mentioned in the NOC. Which means that as per the old policy, an NOC could be given for a statue even if a minority community was opposed to it (the local administration needed to have the political will). "


THIS is blatant Muslim Appeasement under the guise of the "SC order".


PS: BTW that order in Marathi talks about "communal tension" if statues are put up, hence the order to seek their "permission".

 

[ranjeet]

Sadly you are mistaken and so is that chap on twitter.

THIS is the SC order you are referring to. Do you see anything about seeking "minority" permission ?

http://kmc.up.nic.in/PDF_Files/others/SC orders regarding construction of statue in public places.pdf


Read this for further clarity on this issue,

http://www.opindia.com/2017/05/in-m...en-on-your-private-land-if-minorities-object/

"....However, the 2005 policy did not require explicit ‘no objection’ from minorities, rather it said that the wishes of minorities should be mentioned in the NOC. Which means that as per the old policy, an NOC could be given for a statue even if a minority community was opposed to it (the local administration needed to have the political will). "


THIS is blatant Muslim Appeasement under the guise of the "SC order".


PS: BTW that order in Marathi talks about "communal tension" if status are put up, hence the order to seek their "permission".

You may be right here.

 

[Vishwabalas]

You may be right here.

Which brings us to the larger question about BJP in Maharashtra and Fadnavis.

He is not driven by principles, but by political expediency. That makes him another Nitish kumar, and not a Modi or a Yogi. In short he is another congressman in the BJP.

 

[adil_minhas]

Look at Fadnavis's demeanour and face.

It is a crime such a man leads Marathas.

 

[Vishwabalas]

Look at Fadnavis's demeanour and face.

It is a crime such a man leads Marathas.

No doubt you would prefer someone like Abdul Rehman Antulay, the god father of Dawood Ibrahim to lead Maharashtra again.

 

[adil_minhas]

Maharashtra (and most of India for that matter) belongs to the Marathas.

The Brahmins (fair or dark, north or south) are gutless and spineless. Only good for conniving and intrigue.

The Marathas have woken up and are going to take their state back from the bammans and shaddus.

Just because they've been lying peaceful for 200 years, back to and busy in shetkari for the most part, slimy castes have begun doing tandav on their heads.

 

[Vishwabalas]

Maharashtra (and most of India for that matter) belongs to the Marathas.

The Brahmins (fair or dark, north or south) are gutless and spineless. Only good for conniving and intrigue.

The Marathas have woken up and are going to take their state back from the bammans and shaddus.

And Yet it was the Brahmin Peshwa who recaptured India for the Maratha's and for the Hindus of India

Did you know about his "muslim" wife ?

 

[adil_minhas]

Most maratha spit on Peshwas. Fact.

 

[Vishwabalas]

Most maratha spit on Peshwas. Fact.

LOL........ nice try.

But reality is Balaji Vishwanath, Bajirao Peshwa and Chimaji Ballal Apa are Heros of the same Maratha.

So is Bal Ganghadhar Tilak. Another Brahmin Hero of the Maratha.

They hated him so much that this was the crowd that turned up when in died in 1920

 

[adil_minhas]

I have to discuss Maratha societal nuances and politics and intrigue now with a malayali expert.

The wondrous nature of the modern Indian union.

Who knows. Next they'll try and teach us how to grow a spine and fight.

 

[Vishwabalas]

I have to discuss Maratha societal nuances and politics and intrigue now with a malayali expert.

The wondrous nature of modern Indian union.

Says the Bihari muslim.........

Who knows. Next they'll try and teach us how to grow a spine and fight.

Those who had a spine did not change their religion and fought till the end. Those who did not have a spine, converted and gave up the fight.

...and now they preach courage

 

[adil_minhas]

Malayali expert should know how many Maratha Muslims fought in Chatrapati Maharaj's armies across India. Against foreigners.

What exactly was the Malayali contribution in any war on Indian soil against any foreign invader?

Their women were raped by anyone and everyone till the Maratha came and delivered them.

Shameless people.

Talk to any malayali long enough, he or she will bring in Adi Shankaracharya, as if it means anything to a nation and people at war.

 

[Vishwabalas]

Malayali expert should know how many Maratha Muslims fought in Chatrapati Maharaj's armies across India. Against foreigners.

What exactly was the Malayali contribution in any war on Indian soil against any foreign invader?

Their women were raped by anyone and everyone till the Maratha came and delivered them.

Shameless people.

.....................

Malayalees kicked out Tipu Sultan and that pretty much finished him and his end came pretty soon. If only he had not attempted to invade kerala, he would have continued his rule like his father.


Kerala continued to be a Free kingdom and was not even under British rule you moron. IT was a princely state which had a treaty with the british under the subsidiary alliance signed 1791.

It continued to be a Hindu kingdom until it became a part of India in 1947. LOL at bihari muslims who pretend to know history.