What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

This may well be the biggest national political news since Narendra Modi was made the BJP's prime ministerial candidate in September 2013. Jaitley is perhaps eminently qualified to pull off a Pranab Mukherjee, considering the fact that he is the only minister in the Union Cabinet whom Modi regularly consults on political and administrative issues. Unarguably, Jaitley is as close to Modi as Mukherjee was to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, and the prime minister would have to accommodate his personal choice just as Sonia Gandhi had done in Mukherjee's case

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has been pressing Modi to allocate the crucial finance portfolio to someone else as the economy under Jaitley hasn't exactly fired on all cylinders.

But Modi has stood his ground and fobbed off all attempts to replace Jaitley.

Now a word about the other strategic considerations that Modi may have if Jaitley becomes the BJP's Presidential candidate. By doing so, Modi will get a chance of having another go at kickstarting the economy with a new finance minister at the helm, thus showing the world how serious he is in his efforts at economic and political reforms in tune with the international community's aspirations.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/bjp-eyeing-jaitley-for-presidents-post/20160621.htm

Damn this would be a masterstroke by Modi if this become true and how many of you guys wants to see Jaitely as President

@JanjaWeed @Levina @Abingdonboy @ranjeet @magudi @Rain Man
 
.
Jaitley may be a bit young to be a president.
He still has much to offer to BJP and his being president, essentially means retirement from politics after his stint!!

I am conflicted. Jaitley moving away from Finance is a good thing but not having him in thick of governance is not good either. He is well connected and very erudite, one of the few in Modi's cabinet who can explain complex things very well, either to media or in debates.
 
.
Jaitley may be a bit young to be a president.
He still has much to offer to BJP and his being president, essentially means retirement from politics after his stint!!

I am conflicted. Jaitley moving away from Finance is a good thing but not having him in thick of governance is not good either. He is well connected and very erudite, one of the few in Modi's cabinet who can explain complex things very well, either to media or in debates.

Jaitely couldn't use his influence in the Luytens Gang to stop the onslaught the media has done to the government nor he did something Great for the Economy even though he is doing a good job . So bringing someone who is innovative and out-of-the-box thinker to the finance ministry is the need of the hour So giving the president post to Jaitely is the right approach without upsetting him . Actually we need someone who can act like both a CEO & Politician in the Finance Ministry just like how suresh prabhu is doing in the Rail Ministry not sure who is the replacement guy Modi has planned
 
.


Here is the list of journalists
qxWUE5F.jpg
 
. .
After Tanker Scam, Number Plate Racket Haunts AAP

After the tanker scam grabbed headlines in the capital, another fraudulent scheme has come to the fore on Tuesday.

The inquiry committee report set up by the Delhi government dated January 31, 2014, raised serious questions about the contract awarded to Romserta Technologies Limited for the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP).

Romserta Technologies Limited was awarded the High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) contracts in March 2012 by the then Sheila Dikshit government.

The company, however, was red-flagged by the Kejriwal government in 2014 following which the Sikkim government had rejected its bid for the company.

According to a report, a copy of which is in possession with CNN-News18, mentions that the company has been involved in the supply of substandard and uncertified plates.


The report also mentioned that the supply of plates was done from unapproved sources, plates were being fixed at undesignated centres.

Despite repeated violations, the company is still implementing the project.

Lashing out at the Delhi CM, BJP said the Kejriwal-led government is not serious about fighting corruption.

http://www.news18.com/news/india/after-tankers-scam-number-plate-racket-haunts-aap-1259848.html
 
.
While I was in Delhi in 2015, a week before Kejriwal’s party won the Delhi Elections with a thumping majority, I came across an auto driver, proudly wearing the AAP Cap (or as I like to refer to it, the refuge of the retard). Curious, I questioned his inclination, and this is what I got for an answer.

“Sir, my heart says that he has the capability, and he is the one that always challenges Modi’.

Since we are trying to decipher the psychology behind the theatrics of Mr. Kejriwal, it is of utmost importance that we focus on two very specific words in the above answer, which are ‘heart’ and ‘Modi’.

The mere fact that Mr. Kejriwal was elected signifies the emotional tendency of Indians while electing their representatives. We saw that in Bihar recently, where the caste-card was played along with a coalition without any conscience. So what if the politician was indulged in cheap theatrics or rampant corruption in the past, for the Indian population, the vote is where the heart is, and this is exactly what drives Mr. Kejriwal to an insane limit when it is about mocking/questioning/abusing the Prime Minister.

CM Narendra Modi rose to prominence after a successful show in Gujarat. Without getting into static numbers, let’s simply recall the phenomenal efforts put in by him to help the state after a devastating Earthquake, prolonged droughts, and all this while tackling an army of corrupt NGOs and famous media personalities. The rise of Narendra Modi wasn’t the rise of a CM alone, but of countless Indians who still believed in the Constitution, but were sick of the Congress, who still believed in the vibrant social structure of our democracy, but were plagued by the communal faults created by the Indian National Congress. However, Kejriwal relishes both, a sickening Congress and the communal divide, without any love for the constitution.

Unlike the Prime Minister, the rise of Kejriwal was on an emotion that was temporary. While the former focused on taking the country forward, the latter’s primary priority was himself. A couple of years have passed since the elections, and today, we witness theatrics of a very different kind. With time, Kejriwal has evolved in his theatrics. Is he really obsessed with Modi? Does he work on the orders of Congress? What makes Kejriwal chant Modi day and night?


some tweets from Kejriwal:




From movies to cartoons, Kejriwal blames it all on Modi (and these are tweets from the past fortnight alone), and he doesn’t stop there. Any tweet, any link, anything that questions the Modi Government is immediately endorsed by Kejriwal. For the ones who are curious, visit the Twitter timeline of Kejriwal and you shall learn that the frequency of endorsements and mentions outshines that of original tweets by a huge margin.

So, why does he do that?

Kejriwal doesn’t have the intellect or intelligence that is essential to run a State or an Election. If you left him alone in a room with the documentation of a scheme that was to be implemented, chances are that he would be found protesting the documentation itself for not criticizing Modi.

Today, he doesn’t only rule the news cycles (thanks to his ‘krantikari’ connections), but also succeeds in creating a diversion that lowers the discourse of our own daily discussions. When we should be discussing the possibility of a bullet train, we end up focused on college degrees. While we should look to focus on startups and entrepreneurs, we are left discussing the fascism that exists in the dreams of Kejriwal.

Let me give you an example, last week, when our focus should have been on the visit of our Prime Minister to the US Congress, we were left agonizing over the pointless controversy of a movie that ‘tried’ showcasing the drug problem in Punjab. This wasn’t the first time the diversion card was played. Earlier this year, when the ‘Make in India’ event was going on, another pointless controversy was cooked up for the attention to shift from the Prime Minister to Kejriwal.

So, when Kejriwal repeatedly mentions Modi on his Twitter timeline, he gets the following things done:

  • Shifts the attention from developments that are way more important than his theatrics;
  • Tries to create an atmosphere online where people can see him as the rival to the PM;
  • Projects himself as an alternative to the governance setup, he claims, is flawed;

Kejriwal is not stupid. He realizes that Rahul Gandhi has been discarded by everyone but the leadership of Congress. His continuous attempts to demean the PM are an attempt to fill in the vacuum created by the low IQ of Rahul Gandhi. As we approach the next elections in 2019, the theatrics are just going to increase.

Addressing the next question, what really happens when the lunatic with a muffler demeans the stature and office of the PM?
  • He gets to share digital space with the PM in the form of articles, mentions, tweets and so on.
  • The news cycles have to focus on him, irrespective of the great work being carried out elsewhere.
  • Even without any national standing, he is seen as an equal to the leader of the ruling party.
  • He doesn’t end up in a discarded corner of Indian Politics, which he fears can be the case given his party’s negligible history and achievements.
A recent report by ‘Fountain Ink’ discussed how the party had been using SEO (Search Engine Optimization, used by businesses around the globe to get the top spot on Google, thus gaining more potential customers) to expand their reach, get articles with positive feedbacks and reports closer to the top page of Google, and so on.

To summarize it all, from a single Tweet from the Delhi CM to a 200-word pointless article on TOI or ‘Bloody Wasted Mary’ is a part of a puzzle, a puzzle when completed would form a larger picture, with an aim to disrupt the PM, to divert attention from the work being done, and most importantly, to confuse the Indian voter.

Railway Ministry has successfully helped the drought-hit districts with a consistent supply of water in the past few weeks, but what did the news cycles focus on when the relief services were being initiated; on a single tweet from Kejriwal that requested Kapil Mishra to arrange for transport services to one of the drought-hit districts. This is a fine example of how Kejriwal plays the game of ‘disrupt, divert, and divide’.

Today, we mock how Kejriwal is obsessed with Modi, but around us, there are thousands of voters, young, uninformed, and starting out to understand Indian Politics who see the Delhi CM as the prime competition of our PM (even when the PM doesn’t give a second of his critical time to the theatrics of Delhi CM). Where the work done, policies implemented, and governance structure should form the basis of merit, a part of the public is being left confused with pointless tweets. This is the age of information, and Delhi CM has mastered the art of using information as a tool to divide instead of development. Kejriwal, with his madness and mad supporters, has managed to create a projection through which he wants people to believe that he happens to be the alternative to the PM in 2019.

So, addressing the final question, what should we do as voters?

All we can do is take a look at the larger picture. Look beyond a single news cycle, a single Newshour debate, and understand the game that is being played in the name of developmental politics. I wish to put the entire fiasco in a simple tale:

The dog barked for long hours to get the attention of a curious audience, and he did manage some success, but what he lacked was the respect commanded by the lion.”

Unfortunately, in India, votes aren’t cast on merit alone, and hence, it is important to understand the psychology of Kejriwal and everything he does in the name of AAP.


Kejriwal is no fool, but he intends to make a fool of 1.3 Billion people. He is not obsessed with Modi, but simply aroused by the idea of seeing himself on a political platform which equals that of the PM, and that is a far more dangerous obsession, the consequences of which can hamper the progress of India.

http://www.thefrustratedindian.com/2016/06/kejriwal-demean-modi/
 
. .
The NPA problem in the banking sector only came to light when the RBI asked banks to declare NPAs. Instead of delaying it further, the RBI in a way exposed the rot in the banking sector. Is that not the truth?

This is where I have a fundamental disagreement. He asked them to show it at the end of 2015. But he has been at the helm of affairs from 2008-2009 till 2016 when the whole problem cropped up. What did he do till then?

Who created the problem in the first place? He was in a position to prevent the terminal illness, but didn't do anything.He says he is the man who is fighting crony capitalism, but I am saying crony capitalism happened right under his nose.When he was the economic advisor and then RBI governor, the share of corporate lending went up from 25 per cent to 35 per cent.

He should have asked the banks to cut it down, say, in 2013, and if he had done that, you could say he did a wonderful job.Look at the Kingfisher loans that were converted to equity. What did Raghuram Rajan do?There are about 5,000 wilful defaulters. As a regulator, shouldn't he have intervened? Lastly, there was a news report that even as late as May 2016, some banks were reluctant to file cases against Vijay Mallya. The enforcement directorate had to force them to do so. What did the RBI do till then?

I am talking about the role Raghuram Rajan, the economist, played in India's economy. Let us not give unnecessary credit to this person.Unfortunately, we have this obsession to give undue credit to moustache-less, accented, foreign-educated, fair-looking Indians. That is our problem.


Why is there this criticism against him that he doesn't understand India?

I told you how the shift happened in lending to the corporate sector. In 2008-2009, 25 per cent of lending was to large corporates and 75 per cent to small, medium and tiny companies.

In 2015, lending to large corporates increased to 35 per cent and the share of lending to the others decreased to 65 per cent.

The question is, who runs India's economy? Fifty per cent of India's GDP comes from small and medium companies. They are the people who have no access to banking, no credit and no formal lending mechanism.Your kirana store, cobbler, etc are borrowing at 10, 12 per cent as banks will not lend them money, but the fastest growing sector is the unorganised sector. Banks will lend only to the corporates who are piling up on the NPAs and have only 10 to 12 per cent share in the GDP. The share of the Sensex companies (in GDP) is only 5 to 7 per cent, but they (banks) want to lend to them. The government came up with a wonderful scheme -- the Mudra Bank -- but the RBI did not go ahead with the Mudra Bank properly.I don't blame Rajan because he doesn't believe in it. He does not understand India in the granular form. India exists only from Delhi to Nariman Point for him. India is much, much bigger and complex.
Raghuram Rajan is a wonderful economist, but he is not a wonderful Indian economist. He doesn't understand India.

He is criticised for keeping interest rates high, but he says it is done to keep inflation under control.?

Theoretically what he says is correct. But you also have to understand that from 2013, our economy was going down. Oil prices the world over were also going down.If oil prices went down, fiscal deficit also went down, revenue deficit also went down, you should have taken the bold risk of reducing the interest rates and that they were passed on.Instead of being ahead of the curve, he became an inflation hawk. In India, the RBI may not have the mandate for growth, but the government requires a governor who also partakes in their agenda for growth.

Do you feel that since the interest rates are high, things have become costlier and that is why the there is no movement or buoyancy in the markets?

Today, tomato and dal prices have gone up, but Raghuram Rajan says he has kept the interest rates high to prevent inflation.Here a big reason for inflation is shortage in supply. Even if you keep the interest rates at 100 per cent, you will not be able to create tomatoes.This is the classical Western economics of controlling inflation through interest rates. That is okay for Chicago University, but not for the Indian economy. In America, there is no supply shortage, so inflation can be controlled by interest rates.

http://www.rediff.com/business/inte...happened-right-under-rajans-nose/20160622.htm
 
. .
This may well be the biggest national political news since Narendra Modi was made the BJP's prime ministerial candidate in September 2013. Jaitley is perhaps eminently qualified to pull off a Pranab Mukherjee, considering the fact that he is the only minister in the Union Cabinet whom Modi regularly consults on political and administrative issues. Unarguably, Jaitley is as close to Modi as Mukherjee was to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, and the prime minister would have to accommodate his personal choice just as Sonia Gandhi had done in Mukherjee's case

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has been pressing Modi to allocate the crucial finance portfolio to someone else as the economy under Jaitley hasn't exactly fired on all cylinders.

But Modi has stood his ground and fobbed off all attempts to replace Jaitley.

Now a word about the other strategic considerations that Modi may have if Jaitley becomes the BJP's Presidential candidate. By doing so, Modi will get a chance of having another go at kickstarting the economy with a new finance minister at the helm, thus showing the world how serious he is in his efforts at economic and political reforms in tune with the international community's aspirations.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/bjp-eyeing-jaitley-for-presidents-post/20160621.htm

Damn this would be a masterstroke by Modi if this become true and how many of you guys wants to see Jaitely as President

@JanjaWeed @Levina @Abingdonboy @ranjeet @magudi @Rain Man



Jaitley is an asset. There was a recent blog post by Kerala's finance minister on why he's optimistic about GST after meeting of em powered Committee of finance Ministers of all states concluded where he subtly explained the difference between Chidambaram and Jaitley.
 
. . .
Rail Unions demand scrapping of Rs 40000 Crore Loco contracts with GE & Alstom

http://www.railnews.co.in/rail-unio...rs-40000-crore-loco-contracts-with-ge-alstom/

ye log sudhrenge nahi

After 5 yrs, yeh same kamine bolenge, NDA is same as UPA did nothing for Railways and nothing to improve Railways.

Dono side se benefit chahiye. India has big mentality problem.

This may well be the biggest national political news since Narendra Modi was made the BJP's prime ministerial candidate in September 2013. Jaitley is perhaps eminently qualified to pull off a Pranab Mukherjee, considering the fact that he is the only minister in the Union Cabinet whom Modi regularly consults on political and administrative issues. Unarguably, Jaitley is as close to Modi as Mukherjee was to Congress President Sonia Gandhi, and the prime minister would have to accommodate his personal choice just as Sonia Gandhi had done in Mukherjee's case

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has been pressing Modi to allocate the crucial finance portfolio to someone else as the economy under Jaitley hasn't exactly fired on all cylinders.

But Modi has stood his ground and fobbed off all attempts to replace Jaitley.

Now a word about the other strategic considerations that Modi may have if Jaitley becomes the BJP's Presidential candidate. By doing so, Modi will get a chance of having another go at kickstarting the economy with a new finance minister at the helm, thus showing the world how serious he is in his efforts at economic and political reforms in tune with the international community's aspirations.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/bjp-eyeing-jaitley-for-presidents-post/20160621.htm

Damn this would be a masterstroke by Modi if this become true and how many of you guys wants to see Jaitely as President

@JanjaWeed @Levina @Abingdonboy @ranjeet @magudi @Rain Man

That would be a home run and excellent way to get rid of Jaitley. But, perhaps a bit late.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom