JanjaWeed
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,772
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
1.) This is why i don't like to debate with Modi fans they are ZERO in knowledge and HIGH ON cheer leading.
2.) You should have read the link u have posted the chandragupta I ur talking about was the king of Ujjain and Ujjain is in Madhya Pradesh not in bihar. His capital was Ujjain not Patliputra.
3.) While Modi was refering to the king of Patliputra (Bihar) and that is Chandragupta "Maurya"
4.) Obviously while in the Bihar Modi was referring to Chandragupta Maurya who was the king of Bihar only a fool will believe that while in Bihar he was referring to king of Ujjain or king of Nepal or king of Persia.
5.) Where Modi goes wrong was the fact that he called Chandragupta Maurya of Gupta dynasty but in fact he was of Maurya dynasty.
This shows Modi's lack of knowledge and low IQ.
If you have no knowledge of history... you should rather shut your trap instead of making a fool out of yourself. Go & do a bit of research on Gupta dynasty, Chandragupta 1 & Samudragupta.. & see where they ran their kingdom from & what was their capital city then!
Need a bit of help? Check this out...
Gupta Empire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited: