What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

1387992573013.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1387992548707.jpg
    1387992548707.jpg
    78.7 KB · Views: 17
Kerala Congress (M) Group Planning a alliance with BJP??? :P


Modi's tactics creates friction within ruling UDF in Kerala
J Binduraj Kochi, December 20, 2013 | UPDATED 20:07 IST



Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) leader and state industries minister P K Kunjalikutty indirectly criticized UDF ally Kerala Congress (M) for taking a soft stand towards BJP by diluting the secular credentials of the ruling front. Though Kunjalikutty didn't name any ruling partners, his statement to the media was a clear sign that IUML will take a strong stand against Kerala Congress (M) whose vice chairman and government Chief Whip was seen flagging of a promotional "Run for Unity" marathon organized by BJP in the pretext of commemorating Sardar Vallabhai Patel's death anniversary. "UDF upholds the secuar credentials of the nation and any attempt by any partner to dilute it will be dealt strongly. We won't tolerate any attempt to compromise the secular agenda of the front," said P K Kunjalikutty.

There were reports that KeralaCongress (M) is taking a softer stand towards BJP as they fear that their candidate in Kottayam won't win the election unless BJP offers help. Jose K Mani, the son of Kerala Congress(M) Chairman and State Finance Minister K M Mani will be contesting from Kottayam constituency in Kerala. Mani was upset with Congress high command for not inducting his son into the union cabinet even after repeated requests. Besides, Mani was also nourishing ambitions to become the Chief Minister of the state and he reportedly held talks in this regard with LDF leaders sometime back.

"PC George might have attended the BJP's "Run for Unity" marathon with the blessings of K M Mani. We must note that Mani neither objected nor sought an explanation from George for attending the meeting. He also justified George by telling that it is only a matter of courtesy to attend functions organized by other political parties. K M Mani's stand is a clear sign that George is an envoy to K M Mani for building a secret alliance with BJP in the coming Lok Sabha elections," says an insider. Interestingly, Kerala Congress parties never took a hard stand against BJP on any occasions in the past too.

BJP is really happy over the new developments. The appearance of government Chief Whip to their function gave them much leverage than expected. The controversy helped them to air their thoughts through the media and to explain their stand on the issue. Though BJP never ever won any seats in Loks Sabha or assembly elections in Kerala, they now enjoys a better position in Kerala as they have approximately 20 percent vote share and they can very well become the deciding factor in any poll. In 2004 Lok Sabha elections, even IFDP a small party chaired by P C Thomas got elected with the support from BJP. Interestingly it was the first parliamentary electoral victory of a NDA member in the state. "We are happy that now BJP is no untouchable party in Kerala. This time we would like to shield our own candidates in all the 20 Lok Sabha constituencies in Kerala," says BJP state President V Muralidharan.

The comments by P C George in support Narendra Modi also seems to have irritated IUML leaders. P C George said that Modi was neither a leper nor an HIV patient to keep away from and he was no untouchable too. Congress leaders are yet to react to Kunjalikutty's comments as they don't know how to pacify IUML over the issue.



Modi's tactics creates friction within ruling UDF in Kerala : South, News - India Today
 
Though BJP never ever won any seats in Loks Sabha or assembly elections in Kerala, they now enjoys a better position in Kerala as they have approximately 20 percent vote share and they can very well become the deciding factor in any poll. In 2004 Lok Sabha elections, even IFDP a small party chaired by P C Thomas got elected with the support from BJP.

Effort should be made to form an alliance against the congress and communists maggots.
 
In big relief to Narendra Modi, metropolitan magistrate BJ Ganatra rejected Zakia Jafri's protest petition against the Supreme Court-appointed SIT's clean chit to Narendra Modi and 57 others in a 2002 Gujarat riots case.

The magistrate had earlier fixed October 28 and then December 2 for pronouncement of verdict on Zakia Jafri's petition against the clean chit to Modi and 57 others which included top BJP leaders and police officers. Since the judge could not complete the order, he posted it for Thursday.

Zakia's husband, former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri, was killed in the riots along with 69 others in one of the worst massacres at Gulbarg Society in Ahmedabad on February 28, 2002.

Proceedings in the matter ended on September 30. The court has got more than 25,000 pages of the SIT's probe report for perusal. Further, Zakia Jafri had filed a voluminous protest petition and written replies. The SIT too has filed a written reply as rejoinder.

It was on September 12, 2011 that the Supreme Court had said it would no longer monitor the case after the SIT cleared Modi of the accusation that he had failed to discharge his constitutional duty to intervene swiftly to stop communal riots. The case was sent back to the lower court.

Modi had immediately tweeted, "God is great," and announced the three-day Sadbhavana fast to embrace Muslims. The fast, started on his 61st birthday on September 17, 2011 had launched his campaign to become BJP's prime ministerial candidate.

The SIT claimed that it could not find any prosecutable evidence against the accused persons regarding their involvement in the alleged conspiracy behind the riots. It had even refused to treat IPS officers like RB Sreekumar, Rahul Sharma and Sanjiv Bhatt as witnesses on the ground that their statements are hearsay evidence.

On the other hand, Zakia has alleged that the SIT has been shielding Modi and others by not believing statements given by these police officers and neglecting the available evidence. Zakia has accused the SIT of playing the role of a court by adjudging the truth of the available evidence. Her lawyers contended that the investigation was incomplete and the probe agency had not even done it seriously.

On the opinion of amicus curiae Raju Ramachandran that Modi may be prosecuted for inciting communal hatred, the SIT has said that there is no evidence to prosecute him, and the incident alleged was beyond the ambit of its probe.

In 2006, Zakia had filed a complaint about the role allegedly played by Modi and 62 others during the 2002 riots. When Gujarat police did not register her complaint, she moved the Gujarat high court which asked her to approach a magisterial court. She chose to move the apex court.

The SC asked the SIT to look into the issue. When the probe team came up with a report, the SC asked it to tender it before the concerned magisterial court. Accordingly, it filed a closure report against all the accused persons on February 8 last year.

Clean chit to Modi, court rejects Zakia Jafri's plea - The Times of India
 
Gulbarg massacre: Narendra Modi gets a clean chit

NEW DELHI: A Magistrate court on Thursday gave a clean chit to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 Gulbarg society case. The court rejected Zakia Jafri's petition against the closure report of Special Investigation Team which gave a clean chit to Modi and 58 others in connection with a 2002 communal riots case.

Magistrate B J Ganatra had earlier said he would deliver the order on October 28, but it was deferred to December 2, and then to December 26.

Arguments go ..

Read more at:
Gulbarg massacre: Narendra Modi gets a clean chit - The Economic Times
 
@KRAIT : Can this jurisdiction be challenged in a higher court or will this end here ??

Anyways a big moral and legal victory for NaMo and BJP .
 
@KRAIT : Can this jurisdiction be challenged in a higher court or will this end here ??
Anyways a big moral and legal victory for NaMo and BJP .
Will be challenged. Already said by her legal aids.
 
Back
Top Bottom