Indian opinion on CPEC

[Chhatrapati]

A mere omission at one time does not negate a resolution...Shimla agreement by India negated your point..

Are you suggesting it was a typo error to remove Kashmir from the list? I don't think so.

With Simla agreement, the issue became a bilateral one. And India (one of the party in the agreement) do not consider Kashmir as a disputed one. And that's it. You can call it disputed, we wont accept that. The same merry-go-round will keep repeating until someone takes an initiative to make the LAC. International border.

 

[H!TchHiker]

Are you suggesting it was a typo error to remove Kashmir from the list? I don't think so.

With Simla agreement, the issue became a bilateral one. And India (one of the party in the agreement) do not consider Kashmir as a disputed one. And that's it. You can call it disputed, we wont accept that. The same merry-go-round will keep repeating until someone takes an initiative to make the LAC. International border.

How convenient...Why not put Dehli or Islamabad in any agreement ?The fact Kashmir was mentioned is a clear evidence it was considered as such..
You can twist as much as you like but a disputed nature is a fact...

 

[Chhatrapati]

How convenient...Why not put Dehli or Islamabad in any agreement ?The fact Kashmir was mentioned is a clear evidence it was considered as such..
You can twist as much as you like but a disputed nature is a fact...

Humor me.... How do you think this will be resolved? By India giving away Kashmir to Pakistan?

That'll be in the nth century. India is always open to making what I said, LAC as border.

 

[H!TchHiker]

Humor me.... How do you think this will be resolved? By India giving away Kashmir to Pakistan?

That'll be in the nth century. India is always open to making what I said, LAC as border.

We are not talking about resolution.. Fact is as you accept yourself its a disputed terrorist otherwise any other state would have been put in agreement..
No i don't think so India will give away its part of Kashmir by peace and same is for Pakistan..
Nothing like nth century will come but end of world will surely come one day

 

[Chhatrapati]

Fact is as you accept yourself its a disputed terrorist otherwise any other state would have been put in agreement..

No, the agreement never make any claims on the contentions of Kashmir and Jammu. The treaty was necessary because Pakistan kept intruding into the state. There was a war and any issues (without mentioning the region is disputed) will be solved by peaceful means. Shimla agreement nullifies any intervention be it UN, or any country.

And interestingly even China do not call the land disputed. They always give vague comments but always say, the issue is bilateral.

 

[H!TchHiker]

No, the agreement never make any claims on the contentions of Kashmir and Jammu. The treaty was necessary because Pakistan kept intruding into the state. There was a war and any issues (without mentioning the region is disputed) will be solved by peaceful means. Shimla agreement nullifies any intervention be it UN, or any country.

And interestingly even China do not call the land disputed. They always give vague comments but always say, the issue is bilateral.

Indeed , that is why China stamp visas on INDIAN PASSPORT of any body visiting from the said region..

 

[POPEYE-Sailor]

Indian Opinion for CPEC is

 

[Shah Khalid]

Who gave you the right to speak about Kashmir and Jammu?

I Actually Have More Right Than You Ever Would To Ever Speak For J&K Because I Belong to Gilgit Baltistan

 

[Sankpal]

I'm not sure why Indian opinion on CPEC is even entertained. It is Pakistan's internal matter. We can do whatever we feel like within the confines of our borders. Do you see Pakistanis debating any of India's internal projects with such intensity?

If India was a party to the CPEC then it would be different situation, but since they are not we should pay zero heed to their opinion.

Same I could say that Kashmir is our internal matter but your PM cries in UN and every platforms.

The fact is that it goes thru disbutes territory.

2nd security concerns about Chinese present near our nation.

 

[cocomo]

2nd security concerns about Chinese present near our nation.

Why shouldn't we support it, it favors our defenses against India?

 

[Syed1.]

Same I could say that Kashmir is our internal matter but your PM cries in UN and every platforms.

The fact is that it goes thru disbutes territory.

2nd security concerns about Chinese present near our nation.

Sir you share border with China. China has been present "near your nation" since the Indian subcontinent smashed into the Asian continent and formed the Himalayas.

Pakistan opposes the atrocities that India commits against the Kashmiri people because we believe they are Pakistanis. When has Pakistan ever opposed an infrastructure project in Occupied Kashmir?

 

[Sankpal]

Why shouldn't we support it, it favors our defenses against India?

Yes, sure. You can do.
We have to look our security. What will pakistan do if Afghanistan give their land to India near pakistan border for 4-5 military bases that is for India security interest?

Sir you share border with China. China has been present "near your nation" since the Indian subcontinent smashed into the Asian continent and formed the Himalayas.

Pakistan opposes the atrocities that India commits against the Kashmiri people because we believe they are Pakistanis. When has Pakistan ever opposed an infrastructure project in Occupied Kashmir?

Fortunately, Himalayas plays good role between China and India. So we don't feel any big threats from that side

Also we believed that gilgit, pak Kashmir is our india's part and giving to third party hand like China even situation will gonaa more worsts.

 

[Jackdaws]

As a well-wisher of Pakistan and having interacted with Pakistanis in real life quite a bit - not on such forums where people just tend to abuse each other - I can safely say that if CPEC helps Pakistan economically, I am very happy. India of course has every right to make its view known on construction in what Pakistan calls "Azad Kashmir" - but India hasn't opposed it in any other territory.

However, I think Pakistan is being taken on a ride by China - no country does anything for altruistic reasons. I might be wrong. If the same infra project was being built by Japan or France or Germany or South Korea, I would say they would even do it with an element of fairness. It is okay if Pakistan hates the Indian State and India - but cozying up to China might be going from the frying pan into the fire.

 

[cocomo]

Yes, sure. You can do.
We have to look our security. What will pakistan do if Afghanistan give their land to India near pakistan border for 4-5 military bases that is for India security interest?

Lets not get into hypothetical arguments. I don't think that land near Pakistan border is in Kabul's control fully.

 

[Sankpal]

Lets not get into hypothetical arguments. I don't think that land near Pakistan border is in Kabul's control fully.

No, I am trying to say that if it happens then will pakistan feel happy? Because pakistan does not see any India's role in Afghanistan.

So what pakistan will do? Simply protest against in all international level because pakistan will feel insecure
Thanks
Same way India have our security concerns if talk about china in south Asia.