Indian Navy's Lies Exposed

[SBUS-CXK]

Because we tell everyone what is going on. Rather than concealing it. If we had hidden everything, we would be winners!

Yes, suppose you concealing everything. You will have the world top 3 military industry.
But regrettably, the military industry has nothing to do with "concealing".

That is what I wanted to establish. They know nothing about their situation, just jump up and down and fling poo at their opponents.

I don't know an illiterate country knows so much about the world... When they believe that they are "super power"".

 

[Joe Shearer]

Yes, suppose you concealing everything. You will have the world top 3 military industry.
But regrettably, the military industry has nothing to do with "concealing".

I don't know an illiterate country knows so much about the world... When they believe that they are "super power"".

Just remember this: every post where you try to sidestep the fundamental fact that you do not have and cannot have access to the failure rate and accident rate of re-built aircraft, you are seen to be evasive and to be diverting the discussion away from 'difficult' areas.

Please don't waste everybody's time thinking that you are fooling them with these infantile tactics.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Just remember this: every post where you try to sidestep the fundamental fact that you do not have and cannot have access to the failure rate and accident rate of re-built aircraft, you are seen to be evasive and to be diverting the discussion away from 'difficult' areas.

Please don't waste everybody's time thinking that you are fooling them with these infantile tactics.

You have a very big misunderstanding.
—— I can find a detailed accident rate.
But I think this is a shame, so I see China's development.
India is different. India key concern is the "open" (and assuming that Chinese is not open). And it won't make any progress.

If the open accident is a victory. So Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq, Syria.... More powerful than India. At least they don't have 1000 aircraft to crash.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Because India is a superpower. So as a developing country. We want to know the difference.
And it seems you know why the Indian military industry is rubbish.
So, why?

The number of accidents in China is???? You don't know, because your country has no Right to information.
@Joe Shearer China is called People's 'Republic'. Do they really know what Republic means? Looking at these trolls it doesn't seem so.

@Two How do you term a communist dictatorial country (Since supreme leader Xi) as a Republic? I assume you have no Chinese word for Republic (May be I'm wrong).

 

[SBUS-CXK]

The number of accidents in China is???? You don't know, because your country has no Right to information.
@Joe Shearer China is called People's 'Republic'. Do they really know what Republic means? Looking at these trolls it doesn't seem so.

@Two How do you term a communist dictatorial country (Since supreme leader Xi) as a Republic? I assume you have no Chinese word for Republic (May be I'm wrong).

Oh, China crashed 2000 aircraft. India crashed 1000 aircraft.
But Chinese aircraft export to the world. India has only LCA.
And India has given up T-50?

So, If the open accident is a victory. So Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq, Syria.... More powerful than India.
At least they don't have 1000 aircraft to crash.

Tell me -- what's the difference between IAF and BAF?

 

[Chhatrapati]

Oh, China crashed 2000 aircraft.

cite your source.

 

[Joe Shearer]

You have a very big misunderstanding.
—— I can find a detailed accident rate.
But I think this is a shame, so I see China's development.
India is different. India key concern is the "open" (and assuming that Chinese is not open). And it won't make any progress.

If the open accident is a victory. So Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq, Syria.... More powerful than India. At least they don't have 1000 aircraft to crash.

Effectively, "I have those figures but I don't want to show them."

Effectively, anybody reading you will think that you are making an excuse, because you don't have the figures, and are just lying to save face.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

cite your source.

No, this is my country's affairs.
So India crashed 1,000 aircraft and gave up T-50... Now India and Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Iraq difference?

Effectively, "I have those figures but I don't want to show them."

Effectively, anybody reading you will think that you are making an excuse, because you don't have the figures, and are just lying to save face.

Ah, I'm lying.

So there is no difference between India and Bangladesh. BD has better accident statistics, but BD does not have 1000 aircraft crashed like India.

 

[Chhatrapati]

No, this is my country's affairs.

Lol! You don't have it. Ok! Rest of the post is worthless rhetoric. bye..

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Lol! You don't have it. Ok! Rest of the post is worthless rhetoric. bye..

Oh.

So India crashed 1,000 aircraft and gave up T-50... Now India and Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Iraq difference?

 

[Joe Shearer]

No, this is my country's affairs.
So India crashed 1,000 aircraft and gave up T-50... Now India and Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Iraq difference?


Ah, I'm lying.

So there is no difference between India and Bangladesh. BD has better accident statistics, but BD does not have 1000 aircraft crashed like India.

That is what it amounts to, when you claim that you have the figures but don't want to reveal them. Also you are making yourself ridiculous by linking plane crashes with the proposed collaboration with the T-50. If you are not aware of the reasons for the Air Force reluctance, since you know so much about everything India does, you should be able to find out between your reading this and the next time you wish to post.

Again, having 'better' or 'worse' statistics of planes in operation has nothing to do with Bangladesh; your bringing them in is only indicative of your failure to find anything useful to argue with.

Please think before you post blindly. Or argue blindly.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

That is what it amounts to, when you claim that you have the figures but don't want to reveal them. Also you are making yourself ridiculous by linking plane crashes with the proposed collaboration with the T-50. If you are not aware of the reasons for the Air Force reluctance, since you know so much about everything India does, you should be able to find out between your reading this and the next time you wish to post.

Again, having 'better' or 'worse' statistics of planes in operation has nothing to do with Bangladesh; your bringing them in is only indicative of your failure to find anything useful to argue with.

Please think before you post blindly. Or argue blindly.

Oh, But Tanzania also has the accident report publicly, so what is the difference between India and Tanzania?

Pakistan can make JF-17., Saudi Arabia can produce Chinese drones, Turkey can copy China's WS-1 and WS-2... What does India make? LCA is the 1000 aircraft crash "new progress"?

 

[Joe Shearer]

Oh, China crashed 2000 aircraft. India crashed 1000 aircraft.
But Chinese aircraft export to the world. India has only LCA.
And India has given up T-50?

So, If the open accident is a victory. So Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq, Syria.... More powerful than India.
At least they don't have 1000 aircraft to crash.

Tell me -- what's the difference between IAF and BAF?

@SOUTHie

He is trying desperately to talk his way out of a corner, in spite of having been there for almost the entire thread.

1. He mentions 2,000 aircraft crashes for China, using inferior equipment and given the numerous reports of the uncertainty of Chinese re-engineered equipment under pressure;
2. He is unable to show whether the figure is 200 or 20,000, it is just his tactical ploy to claim that he has given us all the figure, a figure that he has no hope of obtaining;
3. He talks about Chinese exports to the world as if that in some way alters the quality of Chinese re-engineering;
4. He talks about a ground-up development and compares it with numerous, almost uniform re-engineering, thereby comparing apples with oranges;
5. He brings in the IAF reluctance to continue with funding the T-50, with no connection whatsoever with anything that has to do with the discussion;
6. He calls 1,000 crashes a victory, when all the time, the point has been that it was the openness of information that was under discussion;
7. Thanks to that mistake, he then starts looking at Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq and Syria, the purpose of this being unclear;
8. He mentions that they don't have 1,000 aircraft to crash, to prove a point that nobody can understand;
9. Finally, he pretends that he has no access to the war records of the IAF and the BAF and asks what the difference is between the two.

Either he is extremely shallow - note that he is not being supported by hordes of other fanboys, unlike the usual situation, suggesting that they know that he has lost the argument - or extremely intellectually challenged. Not being a physician, I can't say.

 

[Chhatrapati]

@SOUTHie

He is trying desperately to talk his way out of a corner, in spite of having been there for almost the entire thread.

1. He mentions 2,000 aircraft crashes for China, using inferior equipment and given the numerous reports of the uncertainty of Chinese re-engineered equipment under pressure;
2. He is unable to show whether the figure is 200 or 20,000, it is just his tactical ploy to claim that he has given us all the figure, a figure that he has no hope of obtaining;
3. He talks about Chinese exports to the world as if that in some way alters the quality of Chinese re-engineering;
4. He talks about a ground-up development and compares it with numerous, almost uniform re-engineering, thereby comparing apples with oranges;
5. He brings in the IAF reluctance to continue with funding the T-50, with no connection whatsoever with anything that has to do with the discussion;
6. He calls 1,000 crashes a victory, when all the time, the point has been that it was the openness of information that was under discussion;
7. Thanks to that mistake, he then starts looking at Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq and Syria, the purpose of this being unclear;
8. He mentions that they don't have 1,000 aircraft to crash, to prove a point that nobody can understand;
9. Finally, he pretends that he has no access to the war records of the IAF and the BAF and asks what the difference is between the two.

Either he is extremely shallow - note that he is not being supported by hordes of other fanboys, unlike the usual situation, suggesting that they know that he has lost the argument - or extremely intellectually challenged. Not being a physician, I can't say.

You summed it up... I suggest you stop here. He is talking like If we ask "How much rice do you have? he says I have enough beans."

 

[SBUS-CXK]

@SOUTHie

He is trying desperately to talk his way out of a corner, in spite of having been there for almost the entire thread.

1. He mentions 2,000 aircraft crashes for China, using inferior equipment and given the numerous reports of the uncertainty of Chinese re-engineered equipment under pressure;
2. He is unable to show whether the figure is 200 or 20,000, it is just his tactical ploy to claim that he has given us all the figure, a figure that he has no hope of obtaining;
3. He talks about Chinese exports to the world as if that in some way alters the quality of Chinese re-engineering;
4. He talks about a ground-up development and compares it with numerous, almost uniform re-engineering, thereby comparing apples with oranges;
5. He brings in the IAF reluctance to continue with funding the T-50, with no connection whatsoever with anything that has to do with the discussion;
6. He calls 1,000 crashes a victory, when all the time, the point has been that it was the openness of information that was under discussion;
7. Thanks to that mistake, he then starts looking at Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Burma, Iraq and Syria, the purpose of this being unclear;
8. He mentions that they don't have 1,000 aircraft to crash, to prove a point that nobody can understand;
9. Finally, he pretends that he has no access to the war records of the IAF and the BAF and asks what the difference is between the two.

Either he is extremely shallow - note that he is not being supported by hordes of other fanboys, unlike the usual situation, suggesting that they know that he has lost the argument - or extremely intellectually challenged. Not being a physician, I can't say.

Oh. you have enough imagination, I won't bother you.

But India crashed 1000 airplanes. What is made in India?

@SOUTHie @Joe Shearer
It's not that complicated. What is made in India?

Pakistan can make JF-17., Saudi Arabia can produce Chinese drones, Turkey can copy China's WS-1 and WS-2...India？