jaison
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Messages
- 210
- Reaction score
- 0
i dont want to heat up the argument
"For the purposes of this academic exercise we are discussing the 2008-2012 timeframe. Not ten years dwon the track where you can make up a few other excuses to cover the incompetance of some bureaucrat"
lets see wat happens
scorpnes,u-212(not u-215),gotlands are the quietest subs if u dont understand that.......i dont know wat u at ,stealth is the submarines speciality do u have any doubt in that.am sorry the los angeles class cannot match the akula-2 they are claimed to be superior to even the new virginia class subs
Russian Navy moves forward with "fourth-generation" SSNs
Sea Power, Oct 2001 by Preston, Antony
E-mail
Print
Link
SEA POWER INTERNATIONAL
The Rubin Central Naval Design Bureau has announced that it is developing fourth-- generation submarines. Rubin's head, academician Igor Spassky, said in an interview, "We are developing submarine concepts for the next two decades. The submarine Gepard, which has recently been put to trial, is one of the latest third-generation submarines. We are working on fourthgeneration submarines now."
Most Popular
10 Jobs That Pay $30 An Hour
5 Regular Mistakes In Public Speaking
13 Job Interview Mistakes To Avoid
3 Questions No Job Seeker Ever Wants To Be Asked?
8 Keys To Designing A Sales Comp Plan That Delivers
NATO has given the codename Akula II to the new design, but the official Russian Navy designation for the Bars-class boat is Project 971 M. The Gepard, which previously had been reported to have started trials in the White Sea (following delivery last year by the Severodvinsk shipyard), is the second Akula II to be completed, and is claimed to be superior in many respects to SSNs (nuclearpowered attack submarines) of the U.S. Navy's Los Angeles class, but this assessment must be seen in its proper context. It would hardly surprise anyone if the latest Russian SSN design were superior in at least some ways to what are now the oldest attack submarines in the U.S. Navy's inventory. Much more relevant would be a claim that the Akula II is superior to the U.S. Seawolf- and Virginia-class SSNs. is this rubbish
Related note: Asked about the causes of the Kursk tragedy, Spassky said that he has his own ideas: "We Russian Navy scientists assess the whole situation with Kursk critically. We are mapping out measures that can be worked out in order to minimize the impact of forces that hit the Kursk, but in essence this is combat impact, and it is extremely difficult to rescue a ship from such impact. Unfortunately, it [also] is impossible to make protection against such impact."
Antony Preston, a London-based naval analyst and broadcaster, is cofounder of the international newsletter NAVINT.
Copyright Navy League of the United States Oct 2001
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
Russian Navy moves forward with "fourth-generation" SSNs | Sea Power | Find Articles at BNET
and ur comment abt the "yawn"
"For the purposes of this academic exercise we are discussing the 2008-2012 timeframe. Not ten years dwon the track where you can make up a few other excuses to cover the incompetance of some bureaucrat"
lets see wat happens
scorpnes,u-212(not u-215),gotlands are the quietest subs if u dont understand that.......i dont know wat u at ,stealth is the submarines speciality do u have any doubt in that.am sorry the los angeles class cannot match the akula-2 they are claimed to be superior to even the new virginia class subs
Russian Navy moves forward with "fourth-generation" SSNs
Sea Power, Oct 2001 by Preston, Antony
Link
SEA POWER INTERNATIONAL
The Rubin Central Naval Design Bureau has announced that it is developing fourth-- generation submarines. Rubin's head, academician Igor Spassky, said in an interview, "We are developing submarine concepts for the next two decades. The submarine Gepard, which has recently been put to trial, is one of the latest third-generation submarines. We are working on fourthgeneration submarines now."
Most Popular
10 Jobs That Pay $30 An Hour
5 Regular Mistakes In Public Speaking
13 Job Interview Mistakes To Avoid
3 Questions No Job Seeker Ever Wants To Be Asked?
8 Keys To Designing A Sales Comp Plan That Delivers
NATO has given the codename Akula II to the new design, but the official Russian Navy designation for the Bars-class boat is Project 971 M. The Gepard, which previously had been reported to have started trials in the White Sea (following delivery last year by the Severodvinsk shipyard), is the second Akula II to be completed, and is claimed to be superior in many respects to SSNs (nuclearpowered attack submarines) of the U.S. Navy's Los Angeles class, but this assessment must be seen in its proper context. It would hardly surprise anyone if the latest Russian SSN design were superior in at least some ways to what are now the oldest attack submarines in the U.S. Navy's inventory. Much more relevant would be a claim that the Akula II is superior to the U.S. Seawolf- and Virginia-class SSNs. is this rubbish
Related note: Asked about the causes of the Kursk tragedy, Spassky said that he has his own ideas: "We Russian Navy scientists assess the whole situation with Kursk critically. We are mapping out measures that can be worked out in order to minimize the impact of forces that hit the Kursk, but in essence this is combat impact, and it is extremely difficult to rescue a ship from such impact. Unfortunately, it [also] is impossible to make protection against such impact."
Antony Preston, a London-based naval analyst and broadcaster, is cofounder of the international newsletter NAVINT.
Copyright Navy League of the United States Oct 2001
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved
Russian Navy moves forward with "fourth-generation" SSNs | Sea Power | Find Articles at BNET
and ur comment abt the "yawn"
Last edited: