Indian Mujahideen a product of Gujarat Riots

[Guynextdoor2]

That would be waste of time and money as there is nothing to study.

Can't be sure dude, they may come up with something truly noteworthy- may not be nobel material but 'ignobel' for sure.

 

[Thorough Pro]

and hindu's history of subjugation and humiliation too. India needs a few more idiots like Modis to push hindus in the dark ages once again.

Damn they know their history well.

 

[Shankranthi]

1. Study Mahabharat war. Bhisma, Karna and Drona were all unarmed in the battle field. Sri Krishna ordered Arjun to kill them because he knew otherwise they could not be killed. But according to your idiotic way of thinking you would put great warriors like Sri Krishna and Arjun as being "cowards". Shame on you!!

2. Repeating the same old crap over and over will not make it correct. A man who refused to surrender and instead chose to fight knowing he will die is no coward. Even when many of his fighters had requested him to leave for safety he refused saying he did Ardas and he is willing to become a Shaheed. As former Indian General, Gen Sinha rightly said, Bhindranwale was a brave man who fought in accordance to ancient Sikh traditions.

3. Yes, history will be judge. According to all Sikh historians who have written books on the subject of Sikh history, they place Bhindranwale in a respectful level along with historical Sikh figures like Baba Deep SIngh Jee, Baba Gurbaksh Singh Jee, Baba Banda Singh Bahadur while Indira Gandhi is regarded in the same light as Aurangzeb and Ahmad Shah Abdali.

Again the same nonsense. Here is a list of reason why they were immoral cowards

1. The Cowards were posted to protect a women
2. They had promised to protect her with their life
3. They were being paid to do the job of protecting her.
4. They had taken an oath in the name of god to do their job
5. The women was unarmed
6. She was in her residence and not in a battlefield.
7. She was not challenged to a fight, given a chance to defend herself, nor was given warning

Only foolish sikhs will consider a man hero when they did so many wrongs things in just ONE ACT. ....... and you are comparing it with Mahabharata No wonder the world considers your community stupid and you are the butt of jokes.

Now a man who keen to die is called 'DESPERATE' not brave. When he causes death to others for no reason other tan to satisfy his PRIDE, he is called EVIL. Only a FOOL will call a desperate man hero. You try to figure out who was desperate and who is the fool who called them hero.

Sadly for you the word is bigger than sikh historians ..............and the world will laugh at your cowardice and will question the moral character of sikhs. Only a 'kupa manduka' (frog in a well) will continue to believe his well is the world.

 

[IndoCarib]

Muslim leaders slam Shakeel Ahmed’s 'irresponsible' remark - The Times of India