I am shocked that you think in these terms. The freedom of movement and the freedom of association are the freedoms the constitution of India gaurantees -- once again, I am not suggesting that the Muslims of Hindustan become Pakistani or Pakistan assist them to free themselves, I am suggesting that the Muslims of Hindustan would be safer if they over time settle in the states that border Pakistan.
There are certain things that are bound to happen, whether you want them to, or not.
Freedom of movement is fine, but transplanting diverse populations and resettling them cannot be described as "freedom of movement". It is unnatural and forced.
Such a proposal has proved to provide safety to jews of Israel and I do not see you object to that movement, yet you would find the expression of freedom of movement and association of Muslims of India objectionable??
I don't see what the comparison is between the jews of Israel and Indian muslims. Indian muslims do not consider themselves a single tribe without a homeland. This is why they chose to remain in their home villages and towns rather than migrate to Pakistan.
Again, you are making the mistake of clubbing all Indian muslims together, which is a fallacy in itself.
Yes, I support Israel, but not for the reasons or in the way that you think I do. Israel is the only democracy in the middle east, and a very useful partner for India.
That doesn't mean that I am blind to the suffering of Palestinians, nor does it mean that I consider Palestinians merely innocent victims.
However, if you had asked me in 1945 if I thought Israel was a good idea, I would have said no, because I would have foreseen the terrible human toll that this move would have taken.
Again, freedom of movement is fine, but what you are suggesting is not freedom of movement, but a forced migration which would have many undesirable consequences.
I must say I find the attitude you guys are expressing most troubling, today you would restrict the freedom f movement and association of Muslim sof Hindustan, what will you do tomorrow? Indeed, it is exactly such attitudes that may incite others to seek their freedom in more violent means. I urge you to reconsider.
What freedom are you talking about? Indian muslims are free to settle anywhere they like, but when all Indian muslims leave their hometowns and move west (which is btw a rather frivolous and unlikely scenario, I had forgotten to add) it destabilizes the country and threatens the existence of India.
You yourself compare this with the zionist movement, yet fail to compare the results of that movement with this one.