Indian Missile tech superior than chinese???

[gubbi]

Thankyou very much for ur post......so for all Indians, India has no missile ranges more then 2500 KM in operation or production acc to attatched image by blueoval.

LOL. You are not serious now are you? You fail to understand that India does have a mature space program with many successful launch vehicles. Militarization of launch vehicles is a tad little more than a mechanic's job.
Now guess what would their ranges be!

 

[grey boy 2]

Its just a cry for more funds from our Naval cheif mate..let me ask you one more question..how many of these countries will give you base if a war between our two countries broke out?? What do you think ?they prefer to be neutral or take a side with you...yes the concern is there in every establishments..if a small construction work in Vietnam by India can also make Chinese concern about us..its natural but in reality its different mate..no country will risk a war by taking sides ..

How could you be denied ? you don't even trust the words of your

military expert, "Bravo", no contest, i shall rest my case.

A little dedication to my beloved Indian friends;

Indian missile tech superior than US, miles ahead of China.

 

[jarnee]

India does not need that much , just be part of NATO. and all settled.

 

[yashraj]

China is ahed of india in almost all militry weopens.

 

[Creder]

China is ahed of india in almost all militry weopens.

ur a disgrace to the cause

 

[no_name]

LOL. You are not serious now are you? You fail to understand that India does have a mature space program with many successful launch vehicles. Militarization of launch vehicles is a tad little more than a mechanic's job.
Now guess what would their ranges be!

Space rocket are different. They require dedicated launch pad which could be targeted. They use liquid fuelled rocket engines to be able to function outside space. The rocket will have to be fuelled first before lunch since the liquid chemical cannot be pre-stored inside the rockets for long periods of time. This make it a cumbersome nuclear strike capability.

The boosters are solid fuelled since they are designed to be used up and discarded before the rocket leaves the atmosphere. I've noticed from a recent post that indian solid rocket boosters are large (as another member has pointed out). Perhapse there is some efficiency issues? And also maybe you can adapt the booster you already have or are developing into a ballistic missile?

It strikes me as strange because I think usually liquid fuel rocket engine are alot more complex to develop compared to solid fuel engine. I don't know why there is so much trouble with the rocket. It seems to not be issues with electronics or guidance systems.

I think the most likely suspect is material issues - The material used cannot handle the high pressure created by solid fuel rocket (one of their strong point is that they provide large thrusts compared to liquid engines - useful for rapid acceleration to escape earth's gravity-hence their choice as booster) compared to other and has to be powered down at a lower thrust. This would explain the larger diameter used in Indian boosters and ballistic missiles. Lower efficiency also means more fuel needs to be carried -hence more weight and volume for the same range.

Above are just my thoughts and not an attempt to troll.

regards,

 

[faithfulguy]

The Indian missile system is not only better then that of China. But also better than that of America. check this article by DRDO scientist.

Indian Ballistic Missile better than American: DRDO scientist

Indian Ballistic Missile better than American

India missile technology is #1 in the world

 

[fanboi]

Eherm we have ASAT (simulated) capability, we have ABM capability (tests done way back when)

Frankly sticking an extra pair of boosters doesn't seem so difficult to me, making a ballistic missile fairly accurate a much more Herculean task.

Anyway I would believe DRDO over CPC e-warriors.

 

[sudhir007]

Does India have such a submarine-launched ballistic missile compareable to Chinees "JL-2" ?

War head nuclear, single or MIRVs (up to 10), each with maneuverable reentry vehicles

Operational range 8000 km Launch platform Type 096 Tang class submarine, Type 094 Jin class submarine

Mzubair bhai ek baat to batao when ever we say anythink about china why our you guy jump-up. Is any there is any personal or under cover reason on this

 

[Iggy]

How could you be denied ? you don't even trust the words of your

military expert, "Bravo", no contest, i shall rest my case.

A little dedication to my beloved Indian friends;

Indian missile tech superior than US, miles ahead of China.

Grey boy you dont understand what I am trying to say..I am not disgareeing with his words..I am saying is do you belive China can take on India in Indian Ocean under the current capability..Its a open truth that in the event of war if Indian Navy cross the malaca street and enter Chinese waters it will be a graveyard for us and if Plan come to Indian ocean at the event of war it will be a graveyard for them

and as for the topic as i mentioned in the above posts the media tried some macho words in it...he just said he feels the accuracy is better than that of Chinese missiles

 

[fanboi]

The Indian missile system is not only better then that of China. But also better than that of America. check this article by DRDO scientist.

Indian Ballistic Missile better than American: DRDO scientist

Indian Ballistic Missile better than American

India missile technology is #1 in the world

He says our ABM is better than the PAC 3.

I believe him.

Why do you think that:

Longer range = Better missile technology

It's not the case, accuracy is far harder to develop.

 

[Creder]

ye missile hain ya kattay, ek ke baad naya khul raha hai

 

[faithfulguy]

Eherm we have ASAT (simulated) capability, we have ABM capability (tests done way back when)

Frankly sticking an extra pair of boosters doesn't seem so difficult to me, making a ballistic missile fairly accurate a much more Herculean task.

Anyway I would believe DRDO over CPC e-warriors.

I was playing a game that destroyed astroids when I was a kid. Does that mean that I know how to destroy an astroids?

 

[faithfulguy]

He says our ABM is better than the PAC 3.

I believe him.

Why do you think that:

Longer range = Better missile technology

It's not the case, accuracy is far harder to develop.

PAC III provide the lower level defence mainly against airplanes but limited ABM capability. US relies on THAAD system against ballistic missiles(terminal phase) and NMD to intercept at mid course of the ICBM flight. Why is DRDO scientist compare a ABM against a lowest level ABM/AA weapon? Does India have something similar to THAAD or NMD?

If not, then I would suggest DRDO or Indian scientist to not make a fool out of themselves by compare a lower altitute ABM missile against a medium altitute Indian missile. How many Indians in here truely believe that India's ABM is superior to the US ABM technology?

 

[MZUBAIR]

I think as of now 2500 KM range is good enough for our Adversaries. Takes care of Pakistan and to some extent China.

Ohh.....we are scared ..............