Indian military ten soldiers killed, wounded in an ambush

[swnjo]

If only everything on internet was true..

 

[Corona]

1. All partied do not boycott election with signed declaration due to differences between political parties. Difference is the reason to have separate party and go to elections with different agenda and approach. Difference or the issue is status of the state of Nagaland.

So as the news states, all parties, means complete Nagaland rejected the indian state election and later for face saving BJP Sanghis broke the accord and played games.

"In a significant development on Thursday, the BJP, after backing out of a joint declaration signed by all the parties in Nagaland to boycott the polls, announced that it would contest the election."

2. Naga Tribals are the once fighting for freedom since whenever and never accepted Indian occupation.

A joint declaration was signed by all the political parties in the state on 29 January not to contest the polls, in solidarity with the call of the Naga tribal organisations and civil society.

For your concern, " The article doesn't say anything about occupation, peace agreements, Indian Army or an invasion and occupation."
here is the article with brief history which was missing earlier from my post provides all the above.

https://indianexpress.com/article/i...nagaland-insurgency-and-the-efforts-to-solve/

Thanks for the link

Coming back to the article, sates interfering in elections because they have a bone to pick with the central government isn't exactly a rare thing. It's them demonstrating that they want more and are not satisfied with the current situation but it's all within the democratic sphere. Nobody declared war against India. Nobody declared separation from India.

About the insurgency, that was again the act of a few individuals in 1951. In 1951 Nagaland was already a part of India and simply declaring 'I declare this land as mine' does not make it an independent country.
From international viewpoint (and obviously the right one) India sent its troops to defend its territory from a few separatists, not to invade and occupy. You can't invade and occupy what was yours in the first place.

About the tribals. Tribal groups in India were historically marginalized and taken advantage of. This was clearly wrong and I'll admit it. But the government is actively trying to correct things. Tribals are given special rights and protection in India now, rights and benefits the rest of the citizens don't enjoy.

Again, what was written in the article shows compromises and deals agreed to between the both parties, along with India responding to an armed conflict within its territory brought by a few individuals. There is nothing in there about any invasion or trickery.

 

[undercover JIX]

Thanks for the link

Coming back to the article, sates interfering in elections because they have a bone to pick with the central government isn't exactly a rare thing. It's them demonstrating that they want more and are not satisfied with the current situation but it's all within the democratic sphere. Nobody declared war against India. Nobody declared separation from India.

About the insurgency, that was again the act of a few individuals in 1951. In 1951 Nagaland was already a part of India and simply declaring 'I declare this land as mine' does not make it an independent country.
From international viewpoint (and obviously the right one) India sent its troops to defend its territory from a few separatists, not to invade and occupy. You can't invade and occupy what was yours in the first place.

About the tribals. Tribal groups in India were historically marginalized and taken advantage of. This was clearly wrong and I'll admit it. But the government is actively trying to correct things. Tribals are given special rights and protection in India now, rights and benefits the rest of the citizens don't enjoy.

Again, what was written in the article shows compromises and deals agreed to between the both parties, along with India responding to an armed conflict within its territory brought by a few individuals. There is nothing in there about any invasion or trickery.

Theek hai shri shri Corona ji, lets hope peace prevails and spread all across India in a similar manner. Mere English achi nahi serious comprehension issues, thanks for taking your time and explaining.

 

[jetray]

Why dont you ask your puppet banana republic to public the facts?


Why dont you prove it wrong then`?



That is just your indoctrinated propaganda

lol, there you go again.

You make a rubbish statement and expect others to provide the facts. Is that how your banana republic works.
As usual you are caught with pants down. Now come up with another nonsense statement with no facts.

dude dont waste broadband bandwidth it might be useful for some other person who is doing some useful work.

 

[undercover JIX]

If only everything on internet was true..

I hope DP of your profile is true, its just like your name. is it?

 

[Crystal-Clear]

score .