What's new

Indian Military Picture Thread

Ok ive got a question.. why do indian forces name their imported equipment.. like mig-29=baaz,hinds=Akbar,t-90=bhishma and so on?
Well, it brings the men closer to their machines...

Giving your own names for machines which were developed somewhere else is nothing new. The British did it with American equipment in WW2 as the Soviets did.
 
.
Well, it brings the men closer to their machines...

Giving your own names for machines which were developed somewhere else is nothing new. The British did it with American equipment in WW2 as the Soviets did.

It was a personal thing... just like today... but ive yet to see any country "renaming" entire fleets or units...of imported platforms...
 
.
It was a personal thing... just like today... but ive yet to see any country "renaming" entire fleets or units...of imported platforms...

Thats wrong, the British for example renamed many US made platforms (The F6 "Hellcat" was renamed to "Gannet") while the Soviets renamed the US Sherman tank to "Emcha"
 
.
It was a personal thing... just like today... but ive yet to see any country "renaming" entire fleets or units...of imported platforms...

Uhhhh the US does this all the time- Eurocopter EC145 became the UH-72 "Lokta" in US army service.

The AW-101s to replace HMX-1's Sea Kings would have been designated as VH-71 Kestrel.


Anyway why does it even matter to you? It doesn't.
 
.
Thats wrong, the British for example renamed many US made platforms (The F6 "Hellcat" was renamed to "Gannet") while the Soviets renamed the US Sherman tank to "Emcha"


The British Fleet Air Arm (FAA) received 1,263 F6Fs under the Lend-Lease Act; initially it was known as the Grumman Gannet Mark I. The name Hellcat replaced it in early 1943 for the sake of simplicity, the Royal Navy at that time adopting the use of the existing American naval names for all the U.S.-made aircraft supplied to it, with the F6F-3 being designated Hellcat F Mk.I, the F6F-5, the Hellcat F Mk.IIand the F6F-5N, the Hellcat NF Mk.II.[N 7] They saw action off Norway, in the Mediterranean and in the Far East. A number were fitted with photographic reconnaissance equipment similar to the F6F-5P, receiving the designation Hellcat FR Mk.II.[46] The Pacific War being a naval war, the FAA Hellcats primarily faced land based aircraft in the European and Mediterranean Theaters,[47][48] and as a consequence experienced far fewer opportunities for air-to-air combat than their USN/Marines counterparts; they claimed a total of 52 enemy aircraft kills during 18 aerial combats from May 1944 to July 1945. 1844 Naval Air Squadron, on board HMS Indomitable of theBritish Pacific Fleet was the highest scoring unit, with 32.5 kills.[49]

FAA Hellcats, as with other Lend-Lease aircraft, were rapidly replaced by British aircraft after the end of the war, with only two of the 12 squadrons equipped with the Hellcat at VJ-Day still retaining Hellcats by the end of 1945.[50] These two squadrons were disbanded in 1946.[50]



...............


As for "emcha" again for the case of simplicity... Coz the soviet couldnt pronounce it....
Dmitriy Fedorovich,
- On Shermans. We called them "Emchas", from M4 [in Russian, em chetyrye]
 
.
It was a personal thing... just like today... but ive yet to see any country "renaming" entire fleets or units...of imported platforms...

Early days defence force give their name but today MOD change this policy & didn't rename flankers ,naval Fulcrum etc.
 
.
Uhhhh the US does this all the time- Eurocopter EC145 became the UH-72 "Lokta" in US army service.

The AW-101s to replace HMX-1's Sea Kings would have been designated as VH-71 Kestrel.

reasons why:


UH-72A Lakota

Eurocopter UH-72 Lakota - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



https://www.google.com.pk/url?sa=t&...jxodRxQCcOP14SQICi-bGuQ&bvm=bv.66917471,d.d2k

Lockheed Martin VH-71 Kestrel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lockheed Martin VH-71 Kestrel is a variant of the AgustaWestland AW101 (formerly EH101) built to replace the United States Marine Corps' Marine One U.S. Presidential transport fleet. It was developed and built by the Lockheed Martin–led "US101 Team" of Lockheed Martin Systems Integration – Owego (LMSI), AgustaWestland and Bell Helicopter.





Anyway why does it even matter to you? It doesn't.

asked a simple question on a Pak forum... got issues with that?

Early days defence force give their name but today MOD change this policy & didn't rename flankers ,naval Fulcrum etc.
ok.
 
.
...............


As for "emcha" again for the case of simplicity... Coz the soviet couldnt pronounce it....
Dmitriy Fedorovich,
- On Shermans. We called them "Emchas", from M4 [in Russian, em chetyrye]

Hmm.. I am by far no expert on Military titling or naming procedures,

But I always thought it was to 'Indianise' the machines.

Plus for your average grunt, who is not so proficient in English, Bhishma, Arjun rolls of the tongue faster.

You better thank the heavens stuff is not worded in Malayalam or any Sotuh Indian language, shit will be near impossible to pronounce.

Disclaimer: The above stated post is subjective opinion, and by no means should be treated as an informed post
 
. . . .
same reason u named CAC FC-1 Xiaolong as JF-17 Thunder & Hongdu jl-8 as Karakorum ...!!

Thats because they are joint ventures and even have different designations in both countries...

Are mig-29s,t-90s,hinds etc also joint developments..:lol:

Mard a Momeen - Your Great Ally China also names them theirs and Says Developed in China.

We only name them - Indian Names.

Next time - we will take your permission before giving any New Name.

Wow man.. you are so sad... poor guy.. @Aeronaut @WebMaster @Jungibaaz @nuclearpak @Emmie do take notice of our poor frustrating "Arya" frnd..

Hmm.. I am by far no expert on Military titling or naming procedures,

But I always thought it was to 'Indianise' the machines.

Plus for your average grunt, who is not so proficient in English, Bhishma, Arjun rolls of the tongue faster.

You better thank the heavens stuff is not worded in Malayalam or any Sotuh Indian language, shit will be near impossible to pronounce.

Disclaimer: The above stated post is subjective opinion, and by no means should be treated as an informed post

Believe me man a grunt is proficient enough to say T-90... or mig-29 or hind..
 
Last edited:
.
10269244_578267478937248_3685651712917570504_o.jpg


10390085_525631074208202_235540585381769566_n.jpg
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom