Indian medias pushing fake news of Chinese retreat at Galwan using 2016 google earth Image.

[Chhatrapati]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1275725484744151049

Calculate 1.5 km from this point where is that.
If China has agreed to move back at Galwan then why is it either 1km or 1.5 km why not give 1 confirm figure?

Propaganda mouthpiece saying it's India's fault? Seriously?

Forget the disengagement process, these are minor details. In the larger scheme of things, India and China agreed to respect the LAC. China violating the LAC on different points started the whole skirmish. That's what transpired in the discussion, changing borders unilaterally using military should not happen.

Maybe you should've waited a few minutes before opening threads saying it is fake news Chinese retreat galwan valley. At this point, you saying anything related to India's DBO construction, or troop pullback is simply irrelevant.

 

[BHarwana]

What is this ? Indians are right in to galwan valley facing Chinese forces. Contention is about triangular portion where violent incident took place. (Please see various sat images).

Post various sat image with Indian base in front of China. India moved back the day after clashes happened when India went to get it's soldiers back which were captured. now where is India going to move back further 2 km back at Galwan?

Propaganda mouthpiece saying it's India's fault? Seriously?

Forget the disengagement process, these are minor details. In the larger scheme of things, India and China agreed to respect the LAC. China violating the LAC on different points started the whole skirmish. That's what transpired in the discussion, changing borders unilaterally using military should not happen.

Maybe you should've waited a few minutes before opening threads saying it is fake news Chinese retreat galwan valley. At this point, you saying anything related to India's DBO construction, or troop pullback is simply irrelevant.

What China says is propaganda & what Indian media says is true? see there is your problem half of your own country says your media is liar & sold out.

 

[Rakesh]

Post various sat image with Indian base in front of China. India moved back the day after clashes happened when India went to get it's soldiers back which were captured. now where is India going to move back further 2 km back at Galwan?


What China says is propaganda & what Indian media says is true? see there is your problem half of your own country says your media is liar & sold out.

You are getting confused between "base" and "position".
Regarding media, there are two kind of people, one reporting from OSINT accounts and other official account (which is not revealing much).

 

[Chhatrapati]

What China says is propaganda & what Indian media says is true? see there is your problem half of your own country says your media is liar & sold out.

Now you're simply clutching at straws.

What Shiv Aroor said is true, for one. Do you agree with that or not? That is both India and China troops agreed to move back from the Galwan valley site and promise to reinstate the LAC status again.

 

[BHarwana]

You are getting confused between "base" and "position".
Regarding media, there are two kind of people, one reporting from OSINT accounts and other official account (which is not revealing much).

I am not confusing any thing, if disengagement is happening at Galwan & both are moving back from their positions that means India can't use DBO road & there is no better good news than that. I have also seen sat Images Galwan disengagement will happen in future not happening now. China will stay where that image from that journalist was posted. I am in favor of India moving back at Galwan.

 

[Mighty Lion]

I am not confusing any thing, if disengagement is happening at Galwan & both are moving back from their positions that means India can't use DBO road & there is no better good news than that. I have also seen sat Images Galwan disengagement will happen in future not happening now. China will stay where that image from that journalist was posted. I am in favor of India moving back at Galwan.

Are drunk or what?
This is the buffer zone.
Whereas DBO road is 10 km away.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280054738659115008

India and China will dismantle all positions within the circle.

 

[BHarwana]

Now you're simply clutching at straws.

What Shiv Aroor said is true, for one. Do you agree with that or not? That is both India and China troops agreed to move back from the Galwan valley site and promise to reinstate the LAC status again.

I don't agree the position China is holding at Galwan will be held by it cause disengagement at Galwan already happened Shiv lied about it. There is already a distance of at least 6 km between India & China at Galwan how much more you want. You want India to move totally out of that region?. Look at Shiv's tweeted second Image. You & I both know that at Galwan India & China are not face to face.
This Image is again misleading.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280054738659115008

Are drunk or what?
This is the buffer zone.
Whereas DBO road is 10 km away.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280054738659115008

India and China will dismantle all positions within the circle.

How is this de buffer zone? Chinese claim of LAC is at this point.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1275725484744151049

 

[Dante80]

What China says is propaganda & what Indian media says is true? see there is your problem half of your own country says your media is liar & sold out.

The truth of the matter is the following.

1. Most media in India is sensationalist trash. They are also prone to coloring news for political bias purposes. Scandal-ology and tension is what sells to the huge market, so one source is constantly trying to outdo the other in ridiculousness. Indian official sources are far more credible, still not 100% though. Mainly for political party reasons.

2. Media in China is not independent, China is not a democracy, there is no such thing as free press (with the attributes that most people define free press with, of course). You will only hear what the government wants you to hear, end of story. Chinese official sources are extremely credible as long as they stay to the de-classified by the party facts. Said sources tend to move into propaganda territory when coloring the facts though, something that is somewhat expected of every official source. Not for political party reasons though in this instance, but strictly for state purposes.

3. I find that in this forum the users tend to congregate into national sects, with each one only being interested on promoting a certain color on a story, typically one that has their "side" winning (directly or indirectly). Irregardless of the facts at hand. I can see this with Turks, Pakistanis, Chinese, Bangladeshis, Indians etc etc. While mildly irritating (since it is almost always impossible to have a fact based discussion lately), I come to realize this as a feature of the PDF community, not a bug. Cheers..C:

 

[BHarwana]

So India will move further back from this point?

 

[Chhatrapati]

I don't agree the position China is holding at Galwan will be held by it cause disengagement at Galwan already

So, it's your personal opinion. You don't agree that's the context of this thread.

 

[BHarwana]

The truth of the matter is the following.

1. Most media in India is sensationalist trash. They are also prone to coloring news for political bias purposes. Scandal-ology and tension is what sells to the huge market, so one source is constantly trying to outdo the other in ridiculousness. Indian official sources are far more credible, still not 100% though. Mainly for political party reasons.

2. Media in China is not independent, China is not a democracy, there is no such thing as free press (with the attributes that most people define free press with, of course). You will only hear what the government wants you to hear, end of story. Chinese official sources are extremely credible as long as they stay to the de-classified by the party facts. Said sources tend to move into propaganda territory when coloring the facts though, something that is somewhat expected of every official source. Not for political party reasons though in this instance, but strictly for state purposes.

3. I find that in this forum the users tend to congregate into national sects, with each one only being interested on promoting a certain color on a story, typically one that has their "side" winning (directly or indirectly). Irregardless of the facts at hand. I can see this with Turks, Pakistanis, Chinese, Bangladeshis, Indians etc etc. While mildly irritating (since it is almost always impossible to have a fact based discussion lately), I come to realize this as a feature of the PDF community, not a bug. Cheers..C:

I am talking common sense here not media claims. How can India agree to move further back? they will lose the road all together. If China has achieved that then there is nothing left to fight and China can relax now.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Indian medias pushing fake news of Chinese retreat at Galwan

You & I both know that at Galwan India & China are not face to face.

Alright, I guess that settles it. Goodbye sirji.

 

[BHarwana]

So, it's your personal opinion. You don't agree that's the context of this thread.

I have given you proof of GT tweet you give me proof of China moving back? Cause that journalist gave 2016 image. He said China is not in Indian territory while your ambassador to China said they are there so who is liar here?

Alright, I guess that settles it. Goodbye sirji.

Good bye.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280050786735738880

 

[Rakesh]

June 22nd sat image, showing Indian and Chinese position....I rest my case, Sir.

 

[BHarwana]

June 22nd sat image, showing Indian and Chinese position....I rest my case, Sir.

Where is Indian base? Is there any Indian flag you can see in the Image?