Indian media not allowed to cover my speech in Pakistan: Rajnath
- Thread starter Dzz
- Start date
Home minister Rajnath Singh confirmed on Friday that Indian media was not allowed to cover his speech at a Saarc meeting in Islamabad.
“Indian DD (Doordarshan), PTI and ANI (news agencies) reporters were not allowed to cover my speech,” said Singh in the Rajya Sabha after MPs asked him if there was a deliberate media blackout.
“I am hesitant to say if they (Pakistanti authorities) had behaved as per the norms and protocol,” he said. Singh’s statement contradicts what the government had said on Thursday.
“I do not want to comment if Pakistan was right or wrong in not allowing coverage. I did not register any protest there. I have to ask the foreign ministry about past precedence of such meetings,” Rajnath said.
The government had played down the controversy over Pakistan’s state-run news channel PTV “not airing” Singh’s speech saying only host country minister’s remarks are shown on live TV.
Rajnath also spoke about why he skipped a lunch hosted by the Pakistan government. “I do want to say that the Pakistan home minister invited me for lunch but then he went away in a car. I also did what was necessary to maintain the prestige of India. I don’t have any grudge. I didn’t go there for lunch,” he said amid appreciation from the treasury benches.
“Our Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee had famously said that friends can change but neighbours can’t change. Our former PM Dr. Manmohan Singh had expressed solidarity and said Pakistan is also a victim of terror. But after all these, they (Pakistani establishment) don’t consider itself as our neighbours,” Singh said.
The home minister said that in Pakistan he sought the “strongest” action against countries that back terrorism and pilloried those who eulogise terrorists.
“There should be strongest action against terrorism. The entire world is worried about this extreme threat,” he said in Rajya Sabha while addressing the House about his speech at a meeting of Saarc home ministers in Islamabad.
“I urged Saarc members that terrorists should not be glorified or patronised,” he said.
Singh, in Islamabad, did not name any countries or individuals in his speech in Islamabad but there was little doubt he was referring to Pakistan.
The remarks were an apparent reference to the stance adopted by Pakistan on slain Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani and the subsequent unrest in Kashmir that left about 50 people dead last month. Islamabad angered New Delhi by referring to Wani as a “Kashmiri leader” and a “martyr” besides describing his death as an “extrajudicial killing”.
“If we are to rid ourselves of terrorism, we will have to genuinely believe that attempts to distinguish between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ terrorists are misleading, and thus, no type of terrorism or support to it can be justified on any grounds whatsoever,” Singh said in his speech.
Cutting across political lines, all parties supported Rajnath’s stand in the Saarc home ministers meeting.
However, the Congress held the government responsible for the “insult” to Singh. “Such an insult had never been heaped on an Indian home minister in any bilateral or multilateral fora. It is a result of the flip-flops, U-turns and zigzags in India’s Pakistan policy that have never been seen in the past 70 years,” party spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.
He said the Congress was “angry and saddened” by the manner in which Singh was treated.
Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati asked if the government would now reconsider its Pakistan policy while the Samajwadi Party and RJD favoured a strong message to Pakistan.
“Indian DD (Doordarshan), PTI and ANI (news agencies) reporters were not allowed to cover my speech,” said Singh in the Rajya Sabha after MPs asked him if there was a deliberate media blackout.
“I am hesitant to say if they (Pakistanti authorities) had behaved as per the norms and protocol,” he said. Singh’s statement contradicts what the government had said on Thursday.
“I do not want to comment if Pakistan was right or wrong in not allowing coverage. I did not register any protest there. I have to ask the foreign ministry about past precedence of such meetings,” Rajnath said.
The government had played down the controversy over Pakistan’s state-run news channel PTV “not airing” Singh’s speech saying only host country minister’s remarks are shown on live TV.
Rajnath also spoke about why he skipped a lunch hosted by the Pakistan government. “I do want to say that the Pakistan home minister invited me for lunch but then he went away in a car. I also did what was necessary to maintain the prestige of India. I don’t have any grudge. I didn’t go there for lunch,” he said amid appreciation from the treasury benches.
“Our Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee had famously said that friends can change but neighbours can’t change. Our former PM Dr. Manmohan Singh had expressed solidarity and said Pakistan is also a victim of terror. But after all these, they (Pakistani establishment) don’t consider itself as our neighbours,” Singh said.
The home minister said that in Pakistan he sought the “strongest” action against countries that back terrorism and pilloried those who eulogise terrorists.
“There should be strongest action against terrorism. The entire world is worried about this extreme threat,” he said in Rajya Sabha while addressing the House about his speech at a meeting of Saarc home ministers in Islamabad.
“I urged Saarc members that terrorists should not be glorified or patronised,” he said.
Singh, in Islamabad, did not name any countries or individuals in his speech in Islamabad but there was little doubt he was referring to Pakistan.
The remarks were an apparent reference to the stance adopted by Pakistan on slain Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani and the subsequent unrest in Kashmir that left about 50 people dead last month. Islamabad angered New Delhi by referring to Wani as a “Kashmiri leader” and a “martyr” besides describing his death as an “extrajudicial killing”.
“If we are to rid ourselves of terrorism, we will have to genuinely believe that attempts to distinguish between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ terrorists are misleading, and thus, no type of terrorism or support to it can be justified on any grounds whatsoever,” Singh said in his speech.
Cutting across political lines, all parties supported Rajnath’s stand in the Saarc home ministers meeting.
However, the Congress held the government responsible for the “insult” to Singh. “Such an insult had never been heaped on an Indian home minister in any bilateral or multilateral fora. It is a result of the flip-flops, U-turns and zigzags in India’s Pakistan policy that have never been seen in the past 70 years,” party spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi said.
He said the Congress was “angry and saddened” by the manner in which Singh was treated.
Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati asked if the government would now reconsider its Pakistan policy while the Samajwadi Party and RJD favoured a strong message to Pakistan.
SilentSpeaker
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
We could have boycotted the event just like Bangladesh , the only reason rajath went was to look down terrorist scums like hafis and state sponsored terrorists .
SilentSpeaker
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
raja hindustani
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2014
- Messages
- 281
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
How do you think the deaths happened? Do you think the army goes to people's homes and opens fire? If a mob starts attacking an army bunker, what do you expect the soldiers will do? Twiddle their thumbs?
SilentSpeaker
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 171
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
what is army bunker doing in populated area at first place? what was the reason they attacked army bunker? ( even if i believe u). Why Kashmiries hate india so much?
Great Sachin
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 1,931
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
Pakistan is exposing itself to the world
I M Sikander
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,478
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Soulspeek
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,560
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Army bunker is there in populated areas to take care of terrorists coming across from Pakistan. The Army bunker was attacked by hoodlums supported by Pakistan. Bunkers would remain there till Pakistan stops its cross border terrorism in India.
Which guest with self esteem would remain in the function if its host himself runs away?
Which guest with self esteem would remain in the function if its host himself runs away?
A indian slum must be a bungalow compared to where you live , so check yourself before you insult others . Nearly 7000 civilians die in Pakistan due to freedom struggle from "freedom fighters". Tell nawaz should take care of it first before meddling in other countries .
Rafael
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
- Messages
- 5,363
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
India has already exposed itself and its women to the world.
Similar threads
