What's new

Indian mainstream media shows UAE, Yemen and parts of KSA as Akhand Bharat

Not many people understand the above. It is all psychological and a result of severe indian inferiority complex. indians know that they are by a HUGE margin the most ugliest and physically repulsive creatures on planet earth, hence they want the races that are more physically appealing/beautiful/better looking to become indians. This thinking explains the indian rape threats against Kashmiri women and other indians making comments such as, "can't wait to get a light-skinned Kashmiri woman." The above also explains why an increasing number of indian women in the west are having non-indian partners and breeding with them. They want to get rid of indian hyper-ugliness and racial/genetic inferiority.
Easy lays.
Arabs need to see this. This was the point of this post. We can have a laugh or two, but GCC Arabs should know whose lap their leaders are sitting in. These people are not anyone's.
 
.
Subcontinent in its almost entirety has been ruled by 3 empires (95% of time subcontinent had multiple rulers)
1. During Ashoka time ( He was Budhist)
2. Aurangzeb (He was muslim)
3. British Empire (They are Christians)

Hindus never ruled the subcontinent as one state, there were small states though which had pledged their loyalty


If they are part of Akhand Bharat then how come Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Babur, Abdalietc are invaders ??? By Akhund Bharat logic they only dethroned their countrymen
 
. .
GCC Arabs are being too eager to sit in the lap of India due to its market size. Meanwhile, this is what the Indian intelligentsia most of which has now been infiltrated and compromised by ultra-right-wing Hindu supremacists aspires for. Entire UAE and Oman, the most pro India Khaleeji states are being shown as part of the Akhand Bharat by one of the most-watched, pro-Indian Hindu nationalist government Indian TV channels. Not only that but the oil-rich parts of Saudi Arabia and entire Yemen are also now parts of Hindutva fantasy.

Arabs should get to know about this.

India is a 74 year old child, nothing more.

But, why have they shown India as divided into many parts? lol, like they already know India will be breaking into many pieces.
 
.
Subcontinent in its almost entirety has been ruled by 3 empires (95% of time subcontinent had multiple rulers)
1. During Ashoka time ( He was Budhist)
2. Aurangzeb (He was muslim)
3. British Empire (They are Christians)

Hindus never ruled the subcontinent as one state, there were small states though which had pledged their loyalty


If they are part of Akhand Bharat then how come Ghauri, Ghaznavi, Babur, Abdalietc are invaders ??? By Akhund Bharat logic they only dethroned their countrymen

1. Ashoka's full control lasted only a few decades, nothing more.
2. Aurangzeb's full control also lasted only a few decades, nothing more.
3. The British never really had full control, it was more of a political compromise, even this compromised setup lasted less then a hundred years.

Various European empires had longer rule, the Roman empire lasted a thousand years, and used a singular language and singular structure, which India the region, never has, even today India does not have national language. They are still in the nation building phase.

Even with such rich unitary history and rule, the Europeans are not crazy enough to claim historical nationhood.
Indians are stuck in their fantasy of bharat mata. bharat mata is fictional character created in a stage show little over 100 years ago. In it's original form was Bengal mata, which morphed into bharat mata :rofl:

Indians have nothing but fantasies.
 
.
Has anyone bothered to read the comments on that idiotic tweet? The Indians are mocking it. There has always been a big gap between what those in power (politicians and media) try to peddle versus what is reality. Such shit gets eyeballs and clicks, and like they say in showbiz - 'There is no such thing as bad publicity'. News is showbiz these days and they play by that rule
 
Last edited:
. .
1. Ashoka's full control lasted only a few decades, nothing more.
2. Aurangzeb's full control also lasted only a few decades, nothing more.
3. The British never really had full control, it was more of a political compromise, even this compromised setup lasted less then a hundred years.

Various European empires had longer rule, the Roman empire lasted a thousand years, and used a singular language and singular structure, which India the region, never has, even today India does not have national language. They are still in the nation building phase.

Even with such rich unitary history and rule, the Europeans are not crazy enough to claim historical nationhood.
Indians are stuck in their fantasy of bharat mata. bharat mata is fictional character created in a stage show little over 100 years ago. In it's original form was Bengal mata, which morphed into bharat mata :rofl:

Indians have nothing but fantasies.
Even Ashoka did not control the entire present-day Indian landmass.
 
.
Has anyone bothered to read the comments on that idiotic tweet? The Indians are mocking it. There has always been a big gap between what those in power (politicians and media) try to peddle versus what is reality. Such shit gets eyeballs and clicks, and like they say in showbiz - 'There is no such thing as bad publicity'. News is showbiz these days and they play by that rule

How long will this excuse last? 1.5 billion years since there are 1.5bn Indians?

Or are you suggesting any mob can just take over India via a media blitz?

What should we do with this post? Cheer for 1.5bn weak people being taken for a ride?
Has anyone bothered to read the comments on that idiotic tweet? The Indians are mocking it. There has always been a big gap between what those in power (politicians and media) try to peddle versus what is reality. Such shit gets eyeballs and clicks, and like they say in showbiz - 'There is no such thing as bad publicity'. News is showbiz these days and they play by that rule

You people are neck and neck with Iranians dreaming of their long lost forgotten empire.
 
.
so i tweeted it and tagged few ministries and embassies of UAE, KSA and Oman :P let them know that they are soon gonna be in a PIPELINE
 
. .
What makes these delusional idiots think they have a claim over territories that were never remotely under the control of any Indian kingdom or empire?
 
.
What makes these delusional idiots think they have a claim over territories that were never remotely under the control of any Indian kingdom or empire?
Mythology.
If they can claim that Universal humm is "Om" without any proof then they can claim any territory to be their land as well.
@Pak Nationalist I have a feeling that Arabs are going to have problems with Indians soon. Both sides are arrogant and believe to be superior, i think it would be matter of years when the friction starts.
 
.
I have a feeling that Arabs are going to have problems with Indians soon.
Possible, but not likely. It would need to become far worse. They have embassies in India who would be aware of Hindutva, yet Modi received high honors from their governments. That is because Arabs don't view India as a threat. If they did they wouldn't have millions of Indians in the Gulf Arab countries. I suspect they don't care about Hindutva fantasies, it is not something that matters to them. Some individuals and civic organizations in those countries did protest persecution and violence against Muslims and minorities, but nothing from high government leadership.
 
.
Possible, but not likely. It would need to become far worse. They have embassies in India who would be aware of Hindutva, yet Modi received high honors from their governments. That is because Arabs don't view India as a threat. If they did they wouldn't have millions of Indians in the Gulf Arab countries. I suspect they don't care about Hindutva fantasies, it is not something that matters to them. Some individuals and civic organizations in those countries did protest persecution and violence against Muslims and minorities, but nothing from high government leadership.
I meant the general public (Indian diaspora in Arab lands) not the government to government relationships.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom