Indian lies exposed over mumbai attack.

[HttpError]

lol very true his accent is typical Indian accent which means a typical broken Urdu, You can always make out the difference between a Pakistani and an Indian the moment they will just say one sentence. I hate Indian accent.

 

[timetravel]

lol very true his accent is typical Indian accent which means a typical broken Urdu, You can always make out the difference between a Pakistani and an Indian the moment they will just say one sentence. I hate Indian accent.

His Father accepted him as Pakistani. His aunt and neighbours who happen to be Pakistanis (lol) accepted him as Pakistani.

Pakistan's NSA accepted him as Pakistani.

The SOCIAL worker Hafiz Sayeed held cremation for him in Pakistan.

but no what the hell he is Indian. Good going. Keep it up those who think he is Indian. thumbs up!!

and oh by the way Obama and Putin are Modi's brothers. The RAW planted them secretly, and that is why they meet Modi with so much admiration. The way they greet Modi clearly tells they are brothers. lol

someone please go tell the PAKISTANI FATHER,MOTHER, AUNT, RELATIVES that Kasab applied for Indian Citizenship due to discrmination by ISI.

 

[MastanKhan]

word by word? or similar in content...

Hi,

Just a few changes here and there---my post will be here in the archives---.

 

[Selous]

then I'd love it and probably accept Islam in a while.

You aren't a Muslim ?

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

that is what i thought back in 2008 and still maintain today

the way Kasab speaks.......and i have plenty of friends who speak different village-dialects of Punjabi

everyone will one day realize that the indian version of events if absolute garbage

As the thread starter says

One day we will find the whole truth about Mumbai 26/11.


but he also says:

Unfortunately it will be too late for most of us.


i dont think it will ever be "too late"....

 

[livingdead]

Hi,

Just a few changes here and there---my post will be here in the archives---.

this is the second time I heard pdf content has been plagiarized by mainstream media(sort of)... earlier somebody copied a post by a TT and printed as own.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Mumbai was planned on Pakistani soil. The handlers were Pakistanis and people who killed 166 Indians were Pakistanis. This is what the whole world believes and it also include many sane Pakistanis.

you have your own people to thank....everyone knows it was a false flag attack

Pakistan stood NOTHING to gain from machine gunned civilians....india had everything to gain.



p.s. the ISI did have intelligence about attacks on jewish targets in mumbai....the ISI tipped off the Mossad. Surely india knew as well...why didnt india act on that lead?


oh wait - silly question!

 

[Selous]

The SOCIAL worker Hafiz Sayeed held cremation for him in Pakistan.

Did he also throw the fellows ashes in the river Chenab...or even better maybe he sent them to be disposed in the Zam Zam well ?

 

[MastanKhan]

His Father accepted him as Pakistani. His aunt and neighbours who happen to be Pakistanis (lol) accepted him as Pakistani.

Pakistan's NSA accepted him as Pakistani.

The SOCIAL worker Hafiz Sayeed held cremation for him in Pakistan.

but no what the hell he is Indian. Good going. Keep it up those who think he is Indian. thumbs up!!

and oh by the way Obama and Putin are Modi's brothers. The RAW planted them secretly, and that is why they meet Modi with so much admiration. The way they greet Modi clearly tells they are brothers. lol

Hi,

The person that was hung----and the person that was tried--he was Ajmal---but the one in the video---he was not Ajmal " Kassab " ----.

 

[TankMan]

unlike in shariat where if you are a muslim you are the preferred one

It is a Muslim state, you can't blame the system for upholding the majority's view. And from a legal perspective, in Sharia, no one is preferred over anyone else, regardless of religion or other affiliation. But when it comes to political decisions, obviously the majority would be favoured over the minority. It's the exact same in modern Democracy.

Now tell me can one non-muslim get away by paying blood money after killing a muslim in sharia stae while muslims can get away.

Yes, they can.

also a modern nation state allows a person can renounce the citizenship and also later be allowed to return to the same country if need arises , can the same be said about a shariat state . you can be killed legally after converting .

There is no death penalty for apostasy in Islam - the death penalty, in ISLAM (not Saudi Arabia) is only for treason, i.e joining an opposing group or nation, especially in a state of war - same as the West.

now dont tell me that how todays modern islamic states are not islamic.

They are not Islamic. If you don't want me to tell you the truth, don't ask questions.

even islamic countries which practice democracy has these laws

Actually, its only about 7 out of 50 Muslim countries that practice these laws.

the proof lies in the pudding not the how tasty it is decribed in the cook book.

If you don't follow the cook book at all, it isn't its fault if the pudding sucks.

You aren't a Muslim ?

Am a Muslim bro but the hypothetical scenario he was talking about involved me being a non-muslim. Purely hypothetical, so I said that If I was a non-Muslim I'd accept Islam.

 

[Selous]

Oh really , either you are a citizen in modern nation state or not, unlike in shariat where if you are a muslim you are the preferred one.now tell me how does a non citizen is treated in UK for criminal offence , same way as other citizen or there is a separate law regarding the non citizen if they commit criminal offence. now compare that with a sharia one , a muslim is treated separately for criminal offence .does the UK courts discriminate if a Indian kills a UK citizen and in another case an UK citizen kills an Indian , both in UK territory , the rules are same. Now tell me can one non-muslim get away by paying blood money after killing a muslim in sharia stae while muslims can get away. .
also a modern nation state allows a person can renounce the citizenship and also later be allowed to return to the same country if need arises , can the same be said about a shariat state . you can be killed legally after converting . now dont tell me that how todays modern islamic states are not islamic. action only counts not words. even islamic countries which practice democracy has these laws . the proof lies in the pudding not the how tasty it is decribed in the cook book.
this answer is also to you @TankMan

Where to start on this trollfest ?.....
1) Muslim citizens in an Islamic state are not preferred citizens...they just have different responsibilities.
2) Under Islamic law a non-Muslim legal matter can be handled by the non-Muslim community without the interference of the state. Muslim laws only apply if a Muslim is involved in the matter.
3) Muslims can't get away with murder...does not matter if the victim was a Muslim or not. The issue of blood money is too complicated to explain here. Look it up yourself in an Islamic book.
4) No one is stopping a person from leaving an Islamic state. If you leave the state and you later wish to return then you may do so. A Muslim becoming an apostate does not necessarily warrant a death sentence.

 

[Kesang]

Ajmal’s nationality confirmed - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

I wonder that whose agent is Pakistan government? CIA? RAW? Mossad? NSA? KGB? Press tv? Pakistani Taliban?

 

[Selous]

@TankMan notice how our posts are like duplicates of each other...
@Pakistani shaheens thanks for all the likes brother

 

[ranjeet]

Ajmal’s nationality confirmed - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

I wonder that whose agent is Pakistan government? CIA? RAW? Mossad? NSA? KGB? Press tv? Pakistani Taliban?

didn't you knew . Pakistani government has not legitimacy in Pakistan itself.

 

[Kesang]

didn't you knew . Pakistani government has not legitimacy in Pakistan itself.

Oh. Maybe Pakistan government is a non-state actor like many things in Pakistan.