Indian lawmaker moves bill to declare Pakistan ‘terrorist state’

[dadeechi]

Good,but of no practical use until the US declares Pakistan a "State Sponsor of Terror" too as it has the power to sanction

Charity begins at home.

India cannot expect US or EU or Russia or BRICS or SCO or UN or any other country to declare Pakistan as "state sponsoring terror" when India her self does not follow what it professes.

If India is serious about confronting terror and wants to implement zero tolerance policy towards terror, it needs to demonstrate it before expecting the same from others.

Of course expect Pakistan to follow suit and declare India the same.

 

[Multani]

Pakistan is almost 20% of the Sub Continent. That's a big big chunk under "terrorists". hmmm ...

 

[PakSword]

 

[Hellfire]

Dismissing the immunity of Diplomats and Officials and Flights over India..

UN designate HS as a terrorist, over the Mumbai attack case, but courts free HS over the lacks of evidence..

For the highlighted part, that is but the logical conclusion of such a motion being passed. If this goes to vote, and I really mean if it does, then it shall be passed. That shall be an interesting situation by itself.

What happens next? Does India ignore the resolution? If it does not, does it simply let the resolution stay and not act on it? If it does act on it, what does it do?

Does it enforce a naval blockade? Enforce a no fly zone? Because anything contrary will be a tacit acceptance of little value of its claims on fighting terror. But if it does try to do so, does it have the military muscle to ensure the same without actually going down the road to war?

I would not read too much into it, if I was you.

As for Hafeez Saeed, you see there is enough intelligence input from intelligence agencies world over; you have sentenced militants on lesser evidence in your anti-terror operations. Why not?

Hence, the sticky position Pakistan finds itself in.

 

[Great Sachin]

When are they going move a bill to declare Modi as a terrorist..

yes you can call Modi a terrorist.....After all he is terrorist for terrorist

 

[RazaGujjar]

I bet if this clown ran for PM of India now.. he would win by a large margin.

 

[Joe Shearer]

@Joe Shearer @PARIKRAMA @hellfire
will this Bill passed in RS?
because lots of things in this bill are against the UN laws and Resolutions.

If yes, then I think there will be no relation between both countries.

This is a private member's bill; the chances of it getting time and attention are meagre.

This particular private member is not highly respected. To say the least.

It will probably fail, because very few private member's bills pass; as it is, the government struggles to get its own agenda through on time. It may also fail due to the paucity of time; there is such an onslaught against the demonetisation move that not much time will be spent on legislation. You will see that in the quoted opening words of the speech by Rajeev Chandrasekhar.

I do not know what you are referring to, saying that lots of things are against the UN laws (there are no UN laws) and resolutions (UN resolutions are not binding on the legislative agenda of individual countries, and each member of the UN can pass what laws it wishes to; making that passed law stick in the face of UN opposition is another matter), so I cannot comment on that.

For the highlighted part, that is but the logical conclusion of such a motion being passed. If this goes to vote, and I really mean if it does, then it shall be passed. That shall be an interesting situation by itself.

What happens next? Does India ignore the resolution? If it does not, does it simply let the resolution stay and not act on it? If it does act on it, what does it do?

Does it enforce a naval blockade? Enforce a no fly zone? Because anything contrary will be a tacit acceptance of little value of its claims on fighting terror. But if it does try to do so, does it have the military muscle to ensure the same without actually going down the road to war?

I would not read too much into it, if I was you.

As for Hafeez Saeed, you see there is enough intelligence input from intelligence agencies world over; you have sentenced militants on lesser evidence in your anti-terror operations. Why not?

Hence, the sticky position Pakistan finds itself in.

It is not a resolution, it is a bill, an Act.

It is interesting to see how many Pakistanis have taken the time to say that they don't have time for India.

 

[WaLeEdK2]

oh boy... just do it already trump satisfy their egos. Either way the US has no right to call others terrorist countries. Their dandy work in the ME and Afghanistan speaks for itself.

 

[Finer]

I am beginning to think USA is taking India for ride. USA says whatever is needed to arouse their ego, but reality shows otherwise as in USA closely working with Pakistan for many reasons, War on Terror, and now taking Pakistan to the board for the international mission against global terrorism aka ISIS.

Pakistan has a lot on the plate working with USA,Turkey and Arab worlds on one side, and working with China and Russia on other side to eradicate terrorism. Whereas India is totally free which means more time for preparing propaganda materials never mind Indian involvement in terrorism confirmed by its own horsemouth aka Ajit Doval as in-charge of Indian NSA.