Indian Journalist embarrassed in USA

[Pomegranate]

Indian Journalist embarrassed in USA

 

[Tipu7]

Oh That Guy..............!

His @$$ was also kicked in Al Jazerra Program Head to Head by Mahdi Hasan and Natasha Koul..............

I thought that was just his bad day. But he is indeed stupid...............

 

[Rank]

Before Obama did the same thing in India when some of the Indian Citizen asked him about the terrorism and Pakistan, Obama response was actually shut-up call to all Indian spectators when he ignored the question and said US is very reluctant to give answers on Pakistan and Israel relations with the US ... Pentagon (US Military Establishment strong relations with Pakistani Military and the Pakistani Government bla blaa blaa). Now US State Department (Foreign Office) slap Indian Journalist on Pakistan / Kargil / War On Terror Question hahahahha ye tu LOL hogaya hey!

India ko abhe bohat time lagayga US ko samajnay may hahaha woh khali inko asla baeech kar 2 3 byaan Hafiz saeed kay khelaaf daydeta hay usko pata hey inke total okaat yehi hey ye ise pe koosh hotay raheengay ahahhaha

 

[Muhammad Omar]

last line was epic

 

[IceCold]

Loll that was epic. No Indian on this thread. Not surprising. The world has called out Indian BS of accusing Pakistan everytime even if a fire cracker bursts. This latest drama was nothing new the world hasnt seen before but the whores continue to dance like dihayati aurtain seeking attention.

 

[The Sandman]

Ye to

ho gya

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Loll that was epic. No Indian on this thread. Not surprising. The world has called out Indian BS of accusing Pakistan everytime even if a fire cracker bursts. This latest drama was nothing new the world hasnt seen before but the whores continue to dance like dihayati aurtain seeking attention.

It's not exactly a secret that Pakistan is constrained in terms of resources it can allocate to take on the plethora of groups. The Pakistani focus is obviously on those groups that pose the greatest direct threat to Pakistan and Pakistani peace and stability. As these groups get neutralized, there will be movement on the others. The Kashmiri groups will be the hardest to take on because of the links that groups like the TTP/LeJ/Daesh/Al Qaeda can develop with them and manipulate into propaganda supporting their terrorist Jihad against Pakistan and her military.

The world recognizes these constraints, off the record, and also understands that constant anti-Pakistan hysteria and poison in the Indian media and government is not helpful in any way.

Take the US-Pakistan relationship for example - while the US certainly continues to have concerns regarding the Haqqani network, the US decision to take these concerns largely out of the media and to make this a much more low profile engagement has been quite successful so far. India needs to learn from that experience - constantly needling and abusing Pakistan through the media is only going to put additional domestic pressure on the GoP and military to not cooperate on anything with India lest it seem as 'capitulation to Indian threats'.

 

[Strigon]

Its the easy way to fame, be an asshole. Worked for trump why not this guy. Only pitfall, sometimes it can backfire.Not to mention, Pakistan bashing is in their genes, cant remedy that.

 

[IceCold]

It's not exactly a secret that Pakistan is constrained in terms of resources it can allocate to take on the plethora of groups. The Pakistani focus is obviously on those groups that pose the greatest direct threat to Pakistan and Pakistani peace and stability. As these groups get neutralized, there will be movement on the others. The Kashmiri groups will be the hardest to take on because of the links that groups like the TTP/LeJ/Daesh/Al Qaeda can develop with them and manipulate into propaganda supporting their terrorist Jihad against Pakistan and her military.

The world recognizes these constraints, off the record, and also understands that constant anti-Pakistan hysteria and poison in the Indian media and government is not helpful in any way.

Take the US-Pakistan relationship for example - while the US certainly continues to have concerns regarding the Haqqani network, the US decision to take these concerns largely out of the media and to make this a much more low profile engagement has been quite successful so far. India needs to learn from that experience - constantly needling and abusing Pakistan through the media is only going to put additional domestic pressure on the GoP and military to not cooperate on anything with India lest it seem as 'capitulation to Indian threats'.

Agreed however my point was Pakistan or its institutions does not sponsor terrorism inside India contrary to the popular believe across the border. Everytime there is an attack, the first to get blamed is ISI. Indian gullible populace needs to call this BS Bull $hit but apparently that is not the case as evident from post of so called educated elites we see here.

 

[Adecypher]

I was expecting Indian presence on this thread demystifying John Kirby's statement in response to the Journalist question. I reckon this is not what was expected by the Indian Journalist. There is a strong Indian lobby in US...is that lobby not getting the traction anymore...?

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

India trying very hard in international community to put label on Pakistan...
Its a shame that one side they talking about peace and on other hand they are trying with full power to put twrrorist label on Pakistan.
This talk is started by world power and there is nothing india can do it.. they have to swallow it.. not matter they make 100 dramas like this.
Pakistan is not behind any terrorism either its Afg or any other country.
Peace.

 

[Mirza Jatt]

What do you expect John Kirby to say in front of press that Pakistan is sponsoring terrorism in India ? Even Obama refrained from saying that.. am not even sure what was the question posed by the journalist... definitely its silly for the journalist to have a direct question like that if he indeed asked that, but never expect a direct answer to a question like that.

I was expecting Indian presence on this thread demystifying John Kirby's statement in response to the Journalist question. I reckon this is not what was expected by the Indian Journalist. There is a strong Indian lobby in US...is that lobby not getting the traction anymore...?

The lobby is huge and is not affected by these incidents.... you have to understand , it is an individual journalist asking a question who am not even sure if is from USA. As far as I remember this guy is from UK if he the same guy who was on Mehdi hasan show.

Agreed however my point was Pakistan or its institutions does not sponsor terrorism inside India contrary to the popular believe across the border. Everytime there is an attack, the first to get blamed is ISI. Indian gullible populace needs to call this BS Bull $hit but apparently that is not the case as evident from post of so called educated elites we see here.

I dunno man. I really would like to belive what you say and I really want that my entire countrymen are wrong when they say Pakistan is behind these attacks. what you call poplar belief is not something that built up in a day. Even if you are right for a moment, remember terrorist attackss in India has been happening for decades from the so called non state actor of your soil as suggested by your former PMs.

Its the easy way to fame, be an asshole. Worked for trump why not this guy. Only pitfall, sometimes it can backfire.Not to mention, Pakistan bashing is in their genes, cant remedy that.

Genes. Good word. tells us a lot about their traits.

 

[Icewolf]

Indians will always try to suck up to the white man, but the white man will always shun the Indian.

 

[Mirza Jatt]

Indians will always try to suck up to the white man, but the white man will always shun the Indian.

I think we can open an entire thread on these lines... We Indians too have a lot to say when it comes to Indians as well as Pakistanis sucking up to the Americans and getting shunned by them. what say ?

 

[Adecypher]

The lobby is huge and is not affected by these incidents....

You do understand that in such press conferences the answers or responses to questions are measured in a sense that they usually/normally aligned with the foreign policy and or geo-strategic standing of referenced Countries in question. With that understanding what message is conveyed to the audience...?that's why I asked the question.