What's new

Indian intelligence involvement in Bangladesh land mass from 1947-today

Should I even be surprised that Dalim who was a Murderer; should peddle some untruths and half-truths as facts to justify his actions?

Well, Mujib gradually became unpopular among the public and the army.

You can read Bangladesh: A legacy of blood.

It has details of Major Dalim in there, and the circumstances he was in before hunting Mujib down.
 
.
Well, Mujib gradually became unpopular among the public and the army.

You can read Bangladesh: A legacy of blood.

It has details of Major Dalim in there, and the circumstances he was in before hunting Mujib down.

So Dalim picked up a gun and mowed Mujib and his family down? There was no other way that BD could have handled it?
Hence the legacy of blood continues and BD will still have to cope with it. @Loki; if you feel like it, then give that a thought.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
So Dalim picked up a gun and mowed Mujib and his family down? There was no other way that BD could have handled it?

Yes you shuld see the interview of Farook Rashid by mascarenhas. You will see in details, also yes read the legacy of blood. A detail of thuggish rule of mujib and his dictatorship. Also how he pissed off the Freedom fighters. His rule was pretty similar to Saddam Hussain's.
 
. .
You said it ...... There was no other option.


The problem with this kind of thnking, with no effort to justify it, is that those who think like that stay like that. Sadly, the deficit of democracy in Pakistan was a legacy it gave to Bangladesh. With all its distortions, seeking a democratic way is better. As we learnt with the Naxalites experience, and continue to be taught by the Maoist experience, resorting to violence solves nothing, and creates a train of consequence that can last generations.

Ask the Spanish. The Burmese. The Chinese. Any nation under earth.
 
.
We are living in interesting times for sure.

So much has changed in the last 2-3 decades and the next few decades will probably me even more eventful. The shape of the subcontinent and the wider world is in a tremendous flux.

And one thought the national boundaries had become permanent in these times.

There is a tremendous challenge and tremendous opportunities for those who can play their cards right.
 
.
The problem with this kind of thnking, with no effort to justify it, is that those who think like that stay like that. Sadly, the deficit of democracy in Pakistan was a legacy it gave to Bangladesh. With all its distortions, seeking a democratic way is better. As we learnt with the Naxalites experience, and continue to be taught by the Maoist experience, resorting to violence solves nothing, and creates a train of consequence that can last generations.

Ask the Spanish. The Burmese. The Chinese. Any nation under earth.

May be if RAW stopped backing dictators like Sheikh Mujibur Rahman this would not be a problem ......
 
. .
And one thought the national boundaries had become permanent in these times.

There is a tremendous challenge and tremendous opportunities for those who can play their cards right.

I understand what hindutva bigots wet dream about. But sadly those wet dreams will always remain a wet dream. :D
 
.
So Dalim picked up a gun and mowed Mujib and his family down? There was no other way that BD could have handled it?
Hence the legacy of blood continues and BD will still have to cope with it. @Loki; if you feel like it, then give that a thought.

What has happened has happened. And I wish things may have gone through in a more responsible and consistent way such that the security of future generations is ensured.

Mujib maintained a one-party rule with little opportunity to counter it through peaceful judicial means. All political parties and media outlets were shut down. So how would one resort through democratic means?

Unless of-course, it was initiated through a violent revolution. That can result in even more deaths and an even more uncertain future. A burdensome thought after all the hardships and horrors of the 71' War.

One would have to be foolish to screw around with the army in an uncertain and volatile climate.

So, what about Major Dalim?

It was said that one of Mujib's right hand men Ghazi Gholam Mustafa's (also the nation's Red Cross chief) brother said insulting remarks toward Major Dalim's wife during a wedding reception at the Ladies Club in Gulshan, 1974.

Of-course, an argument followed. And Ghazi's boys roughed up the couple. There were even rumors of kidnapping as well, but not confirmed.

Dalim, along with his comrades decided to take action against Ghazi's boys, and greatly damaged his bungalow. Both sides did call out to Mujib to calm things down.

Now, for the boiling part. Mujib called for an inquiry into the army, more specifically, and inquiry into the officer's misconduct. Along with Major Dalim, all of the officers involved were dishonorably discharged.

It is also known that Major Dalim's family were close to that of Mujib's. Mujib did apparently offer a business venture with Major Dalim. But that wasn't enough to sooth the pain.

It was after that Major Dalim and his comrades slayed Mujib and his remaining family. Only Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh Rehena survived since they were on holiday in Germany at the time of the assassination.

Though, I believe toppling him and giving him and his family exile would have been a better option. And leave the Awami League Rest In Pieces for all eternity.

One has to ask how the AL is as strong today in the post-Mujib era with a mentally unstable woman leading it.

The army to this day mistrusts the AL tremendously and vice-versa. The army is a state within a state.

True, violence does not work; but neither do dictatorships.

Aside from the Major Dalim drama, there are many things that went wrong during the Mujib-era. It's a matter of control, which itself is a science. He wasn't very good at.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
May be if RAW stopped backing dictators like Sheikh Mujibur Rahman this would not be a problem ......

Maybe if the deficit of democracy had not inclined people to look to dictators to run their countries for them, there would be no dictators.

Maybe if there were no dictators, people would stop whining about some external force - the British, Pakistan, India, Myanmar, anybody but themselves - blocking them from their manifest destiny.

Maybe if clerks turned commentators did not spend their entire life looking for excuses for non-performance, countries would settle down to work their way up, instead of crying their way up.

Maybe....but what am I thinking? What am I doing? Comment is restricted to near Prem Chands, in this far eastern corner of south Asia. Or far western corner of south east Asia.

I understand what hindutva bigots wet dream about. But sadly those wet dreams will always remain a wet dream. :D

Fascinating to read the analogies and parallels incoherent comment uses. It offers a reflection of the thinking capacity of the commentator.
 
.
Maybe if the deficit of democracy had not inclined people to look to dictators to run their countries for them, there would be no dictators.

Maybe if there were no dictators, people would stop whining about some external force - the British, Pakistan, India, Myanmar, anybody but themselves - blocking them from their manifest destiny.

Maybe if clerks turned commentators did not spend their entire life looking for excuses for non-performance, countries would settle down to work their way up, instead of crying their way up.

Maybe....but what am I thinking? What am I doing? Comment is restricted to near Prem Chands, in this far eastern corner of south Asia. Or far western corner of south east Asia.

May be if Indians were not so dishonest and sly and admitted they prop up dictators in other countries ....
 
.
May be if Indians were not so dishonest and sly and admitted they prop up dictators in other countries ....

<sigh>

Of course Indians are dishonest and sly and prop up dictators in other countries.

It is well-known that there would be no dictators, certainly not in south Asia, if India had not forcefully imposed them on some hapless, helpless population in the first place. Detected only by astute observers of the phenomenon.
 
.
.
May be if Indians were not so dishonest and sly and admitted they prop up dictators in other countries ....

There's conclusive proof all over the place.

Look at Pakistan.....

We shouldn't blame on India because her plans may have support from Bangladesh establishment so better to change government than putting your incompetency on others.

This set of people will blame everybody except themselves.

It was the establishment in Pakistan, in west Pakistan, earlier, that was to blame.

Now that's gone. Now it's the next best thing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom