What's new

Indian have smallest Brains in the world-Reserach by Indian Institute of Technology Hayderabd reveals

. .
But those computing-field countries you mention don't brag as much as India. There are dozens of Indian computing-field companies who are decades old and who between them employ a few million computer engineers. This is a lot more than another other country. Yet there is not a single microprocessor and a single operating system from these dozens of companies and those few million computer engineers. A shame. Doesn't matter if there is no Australia OS. Why not from big India ?

The rise of Indians in corporate world, doesn't have much to do with their engineering or science skills. Indians bring conservative, lean and mean style of working to the table, along with hard-work and down-to-earth-ness, and that is very much in demand across the global corporate world, in these turbulent financial times.

Its funny that, Indians are a huge percentage of IT industry, but their contribution to research and new ideas, is ZERO, Zilch. India, never devised any new programming language, or any operating system, new architectural paradigms or algorithms. Indian IT industry is all about low-skilled service sector, back offices and a large pool of internet coolies.
 
. .
Which technology innovation did iceland did that Mongolia couldn't comprehend?

I don't know about Iceland's innovation but I think they are forward than Mongolia at least in computing tech.

Mongolia has been a satellite state of dreadful soviet union till mid 90s ,it's still reeling from the cultural and systematic foot print of soviet union,which is a horrible economic and development model.

1. The Soviet Union was a space superpower.

2. The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. Thirty years ago. Enough time for Mongolia to buck up. But it hasn't done so.

Inner Mongolia,which has more mongol population than Mongolia itself , is a developed as it gets.

What are its highlights ?

One have to keep in mind that,Mongolia's population is just 3 million population,it's less than the population of tiny tripura from NE india, their population is too small to be an economic and technological leader after being ravaged the the soviet system

Israel is also small in population but it has done relatively well.

@jamahir

Beginning in the 1980s, Indian tech companies focused on providing relatively low value-added IT services to overseas clients, rather than developing high value-added products.
Meanwhile, India spends only 0.8 per cent of its GDP on research and development, compared to 2.8 per cent in the U.S. and 1.8 per cent in China,
Above two quotes describe the culture in India largely. The general sentiment is not to be ambitious as described by the saying "Jitni chaadar utna payr pehelain". For those not conversant with Hindi / Urdu it literally means "Spread your legs to only the confines of the mattress".

The article mentions two more successful companies - Flipkart and Zomato - which are e-retail service companies. They haven't developed the two fundamental computer elements - the microprocessor and the operating system.

The Indian middle class largely does not take chances, risks, ambitious steps. It plays safe and hence no real technological innovation from the Indian middle class destined for the world.

Though I must commend three recent Indian space tech companies - Skyroot Aerospace, Agnikul Cosmos and Bellatrix Aerospace. And also the Team Indus group which participated in the now-defunct Google Lunar X Prize.

Indians bring conservative, lean and mean style of working to the table, along with hard-work and down-to-earth-ness, and that is very much in demand across the global corporate world, in these turbulent financial times.

About "down to earthness", I don't know, because one ITES company I worked for from 2013 to 2014, my branch's manager wasn't empathetic to the situation of the employees and I almost created a employee union for this though I foolishly resigned. If I hadn't resigned this employee union would have been the first one in the Indian IT / ITES sector.

Its funny that, Indians are a huge percentage of IT industry, but their contribution to research and new ideas, is ZERO, Zilch. India, never devised any new programming language, or any operating system, new architectural paradigms or algorithms. Indian IT industry is all about low-skilled service sector, back offices and a large pool of internet coolies.

Agreed.

For the past some years I have been designing a microprocessor, in the open source model, and quite a few times I don't see people's eyes light up here when I mention my processor project. Yet these people would give an arm and a leg to work in Intel, ARM or IBM ( companies which design processors ) but this would be because these companies are already existent and famous. Most middle class Indians are just not ambitious.
 
Last edited:
. .
Kind of funny that supposedly small brain low IQ Indians, who once faced a two front war alone, have turned the tables on both China and Pakistan. Out maneuvering both nations. Now it is China and Pakistan who are threatened. Both more and more seen as enemies by the "West".
Pakistan facing high inflation and food shortages. What comes next, riots and civil war? Plus, thanks to the S. Begum precedent, all Pakistanis holding citizenship in ABCANz nations are now at risk of having that citizenship revoked.
China is losing the USD savings it was given by traitorous US financiers and has gained the enmity of it's major trading partners.

quite the moves by those small brain Indians. Perhaps there is something to this supposed fantasy of those small headed elves and goblins (tolkien said they were ingenious) and big headed dull meat eating orcs and ogres.
 
.
I don't know about Iceland's innovation but I think there are forward than Mongolia at least in computing tech.



1. The Soviet Union was a space superpower.

2. The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. Thirty years ago. Enough time for Mongolia to buck up. But it hasn't done so.



What are its highlights ?



Israel is also small in population but it has done relatively well.




Above two quotes describe the culture in India largely. The general sentiment is not to be ambitious as described by the saying "Jitni chaadar utna payr pehelain". For those not conversant with Hindi / Urdu it literally means "Spread your legs to only the confines of the mattress".

The article mentions two more successful companies - Flipkart and Zomato - which are e-retail service companies. They haven't developed the two fundamental computer elements - the microprocessor and the operating system.

The Indian middle class largely does not take chances, risks, ambitious steps. It plays safe and hence no real technological innovation from the Indian middle class destined for the world.

Though I must commend three recent Indian space tech companies - Skyroot Aerospace, Agnikul Cosmos and Bellatrix Aerospace. And also the Team Indus group which participated in the now-defunct Google Lunar X Prize.



About "down to earthness", I don't know, because one ITES company I worked for from 2013 to 2014, my branch's manager wasn't empathetic to the situation of the employees and I almost created a employee union for this though I foolishly resigned. If I hadn't resigned this employee union would have been the first one in the Indian IT / ITES sector.



Agreed.

For the past some years I have been designing a microprocessor, in the open source model, and quite a few times I don't see people's eyes light up here when I mention my processor project. Yet these people would give an arm and a leg to work in Intel, ARM or IBM ( companies which design processors ) but this would be because these companies are already existent and famous. Most middle class Indians are just not ambitious.
Iceland is a high IQ nation,ofcourse they managed to do well,my point was ,their development was rather easy,basically opened a bank for EU and got wealthy ,my point was pertaining to that. And Iceland is a tiny island very easy to maintain and develop onlike one of the largest nation in asia mongolia.

soviet style communism which is the poster boy of economic failure system isn't something even china recommends,being a communist state.Mongolia was basically an occupied region for geopolitical agenda with no development,they lost their culture and values over dreadful foreign cultural brainwashing.

Highlights? inner mongolia has 5 m population of mongols it has larger mongol population than mongolia itself and very productive.

Israel was brainchild state of a group of very powerful people and technology has been fed by whole of west,especially the US for the past century,has 3 times the population in a tiny region. If mongolia received all the technological aid and funds,not a fair comparison.Compare mongolia with a 3 million nation,it can't boost gdp riding population to reinvest in development .

Mongolia is developing well for their population and ,it's heaven compared to states of india with 3 million population like tripura teeming with bangla.
 
. .
soviet style communism which is the poster boy of economic failure system isn't something even china recommends,being a communist state.

China isn't a real communist country. A country with billionaires and those who cannot afford healthcare so have to come to India to get treated. A country whose many citizens are proud of high cost of housing in Hong Kong.

How many space stations has China operated ? A small module ?

Highlights? inner mongolia has 5 m population of mongols it has larger mongol population than mongolia itself and very productive.

And what do you mean by "productive" ?

Israel was brainchild state of a group of very powerful people and technology has been fed by whole of west,especially the US for the past century,has 3 times the population in a tiny region. If mongolia received all the technological aid and funds,not a fair comparison.

Even India and Saudia received massive Western help yet India is a customer of Israel in military and agriculture tech.
 
.
China isn't a real communist country. A country with billionaires and those who cannot afford healthcare so have to come to India to get treated. A country whose many citizens are proud of high cost of housing in Hong Kong.

How many space stations has China operated ? A small module ?



And what do you mean by "productive" ?



Even India and Saudia received massive Western help yet India is a customer of Israel in military and agriculture tech.
China isn't a real communist country. A country with billionaires and those who cannot afford healthcare so have to come to India to get treated. A country whose many citizens are proud of high cost of housing in Hong Kong.

How many space stations has China operated ? A small module ?
yeah because soviet communism isn failed model.\

Am I supposed to reference CNSA advances now like explaining a toddler?

And what do you mean by "productive" ?
For comparison,It has 1/5th the population of Indian tech centre , karnataka but higher GDP .

Even India and Saudia received massive Western help yet India is a customer of Israel in military and agriculture tech.
Yeah,India and saudi don't have the IQ of ISRAEL to capitalize,but also the lvl of tech support and funds Israel receives from the US is totally at a different lvl.Israel quickly developed with foreign aid than invested all their resources in advancing their own tech too.
I though this was supposed to be obvious......
 
.
Am I supposed to reference CNSA advances now like explaining a toddler?

Yes, please do that.

And remember that the USSR had manned Mars missions destined to practically happen in the mid-1970s and 80s but couldn't because of non-technical reasons. Link [1] and [2]. When will China achieve this sort of missions ?

I think the private and less-resourced SpaceX has better chances of landing humans on Mars by the end of this decade than China unless China collaborates with Russia.

yeah because soviet communism isn failed model

Then you should speak for a communist experiment model better than the USSR.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes, please do that.

And remember that the USSR had manned Mars missions destined to practically happen in the mid-1970s and 80s but couldn't because of non-technical reasons. Link [1] and [2]. When will China achieve this sort of missions ?

I think the private and less-resourced SpaceX has better chances of landing humans on Mars by the end of this decade than China unless China collaborates with Russia.



Then you should speak for a communist experiment model better than the USSR.
China would have developed WS15 TAIHANG but couldn't due to technical reason.,Yea soviet union of 1970 and russia itself is ahead of china in space race now !!*sarcasm*.
Maybe space x would conduct the first manned mission to mars ,which is like 20 years away .But space x inherits tech and support from NASA which has 40 years headstart from CNSA.

How did the discussion came to this tho?I'm kind of lost.
 
.
China would have developed WS15 TAIHANG but couldn't due to technical reason.

According to google the said item is a military-jet engine but we are talking about spacecraft.

Yea soviet union of 1970 and russia itself is ahead of china in space race now !!*sarcasm*.

Why the sarcasm ?

Maybe space x would conduct the first manned mission to mars ,which is like 20 years away .But space x inherits tech and support from NASA which has 40 years headstart from CNSA.

1. Though SpaceX certainly inherited people and techniques from NASA, NASA's own SLS rocket system is rather behind SpaceX's Starship project. And SLS is an expendable system while Starship is reusable.

2. SpaceX Starship will at least do an orbit / flyby of Mars in five years. Not landing on the surface but at least a circuit. The SpaceX landing on Mars is possible by the mid-2030s. Maybe earlier.

3. CNSA has lot of resources - human, material, industrial and financial - yet it couldn't produce a manned rocket / capsule system that isn't based on the USSR-era Soyuz system, including three travelers compared to SpaceX Dragon's seven and the in-development SpaceX Starship's hundred !

How did the discussion came to this tho?I'm kind of lost.

I think it was you who started on the "failures" of the USSR.
 
.
Day in and day out indians prove it right here at PDF and elsewhere...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom