What's new

Indian government should hang its head in shame: BBC filmmaker

Given that a German Prof has already made the consequences of such documentaries clear, I think the government is spot on.

There are enough Indian people to tackle Indian problems, we don't need foreign gutter inspectors. Yes we have our problems, but we are dealing with them. Such documentaries don't make any positive contribution to the fight against the evil of rape, but are used as a slander against the image of India. You can see that from the wide coverage given to it on this forum especially by certain posters.

We don't see any such documentaries on the grooming of women in UK which affected a lot of women but limited public outrage, but they have time for covering a single rape in India, which lead to widespread protests.

It is not proven whether she saw the documentary or not, but yes, i will agree that there is conspiracy to inflict damage to India due to it's growing economy, tourism, and FDI. England is jealous! The damage has been done due to titles of the news basically. ex: 'how India became a country of rapist.' ' Delhi, rape capital' , ' Rapes are common in India', etc etc..
 
.
That's called India-bashing obsession. Clutching at straws in desperation to try and show India in poor light.

But then, ingrained habits die hard!

what do you expect, dont we get the same treatment from Indians.
 
.
it's surprising people are still defending the crudely made propaganda film.
There are vested interests within Indian media involved in making this movie. I saw name of CNNIBN in post-credit of the movie... & NDTV did sign an agreement with BBC to telecast the documentary in India. Now you know why these guys are butt-hurt due to banning of this piece of 'you know what'!
 
.
Unfortunately India doesnt have control over its media to target certain countries.

There are vested interests within Indian media involved in making this movie. I saw name of CNNIBN in post-credit of the movie... & NDTV did sign an agreement with BBC to telecast the documentary in India. Now you know why these guys are butt-hurt due to banning of this piece of 'you know what'!
i watched a NDTV "debate",on women's day,there were several female feminazis who kept going on and on about their rights.there was one woman who tried to bring to light false rape cases and harrashment by girls on men but was shut off repeatedly by the feminazi anchor.
 
.
11039091_1615482918685459_8420494165117659261_n.jpg
 
. . .
This just shows that India being a democracy is just a joke.
 
.
Indian government should hang its head in shame: BBC filmmaker

851408-LESLEE-1426063446-826-640x480.jpg

A day after the sole witness of the Delhi gang rape termed the documentary India’s Daughter ‘fake’, filmmaker Leslee Udwin said the Indian government should hang its head in shame for banning her documentary.

Read: Sole witness of Delhi gang rape claims documentary is fake

“The government should hang its head in shame” for the ban, she was quoted as saying in an interview on before the US premiere of her film at an event in downtown Manhattan, according to India Today.

India banned the BBC documentary on the fatal rape of a 23-year-old woman on a moving bus in Delhi on December 16, 2012. The documentary was banned following an uproar over convicted rapist Mukesh Singh’s comments blaming the victim.

“A girl is far more responsible for rape than a boy,” Mukesh Singh said in an interview from jail.

Read: A girl is far more responsible for rape than a boy, says Delhi bus rapist

Udwin also denied accusations in the Indian media that Mukesh Singh was either paid for his time or interviewed without his consent. A title card at the start of the film refutes the claim.

“The home minister (Rajnath Singh) blamed the protesters when these were protests on the Gandhian level, peaceful and right and good,” Udwin told the Los Angeles Times. “The irony is it only became violent when the police got involved.”

Read: Ban on Delhi gang-rape documentary stirs fierce debate in India

Actresses Meryl Streep, Freida Pinto, Dakota Fanning and singer Chris Martin were among those at the premiere, an event organised by women’s-rights groups Vital Voices and Plan International at Manhattan’s Baruch College.

Streep led a candle-lighting ceremony before the screening, reading some of the victim’s accounts of the assault, then issued a plea to the audience.

Read: India channel protests rape documentary ban with blank screen

“We’re called here to contend with something more than rape,” Streep was quoted as saying.

“What is worse than violence? Violence sanctioned by misogyny.” Pinto, a producer of the movie told the Times in an interview before the screening that she saw this as “a universal story, and something I got involved with because it’s not just about what happens in India”.

Pinto gave an address after the screening in which she criticised even Western attitudes about the Indian gang-rape, noting a TV script she had been sent recently that contained a joke about it.

She also issued a wide-ranging plea to people as diverse policymakers and boys to shift their thinking.

Closing her speech Pinto asked people to close their eyes and be “bathed in the light, the light that was Jyoti.”

Udwin also took the stage after the screening as part of a panel discussion about women’s rights issues.

“The disease is not rape, and the disease is not human trafficking,” she said. “The disease is gender inequality. And all these things are the metastases of the primary tumour.”

Indian government should hang its head in shame: BBC filmmaker – The Express Tribune
---
ok
she have her views ..fine ..
thanks
story ended
 
.
Please read all of the above and tlel me is it still "shooting the messenger" to question the motives of Leslie Udwin?

You still making the mistake to take things outside of the content of the docu and bring them in relation. But as I told you before, the content is the important part, not what people make out of it. It's not important what origin the publisher or producer has, since the content of the docu doesn't support the claim that it would degrade Indias image.
 
. . .
Imagine. A filmmaker travels to Belgium because she has heard about the pedophilia scandals in the country. She directs a documentary film, which includes an interview with an infamous pedophile. This man says that the girls he raped had actually seduced him and that they really enjoyed it. The filmmaker then comments that Belgian society is responsible for creating such pedophiles by teaching them what to think.

And there you have the problem, because the docu doesn't include comments of the fimmaker, it's not even narrated or moderated from her, or any foreign person. So where do these conclusions come from?
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom