What's new

Indian government does not want me : Japanese activist.

Shabz Nist

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
744
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
Belgium
MayaKobayashi_20120321.jpg


http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?280314




Not long after deporting a German national, accused by the state of organising anti-nuclear protests in Koodankulam in Tamil Nadu, the Indian government refused to let in into the country Maya Kobayashi, a survivor of the March 2010 tsunami and nuclear accident in Japan. This was presumably because the government felt her visit could heighten tensions in Koodankulam and Jaitapur, where locals are campaigning against the construction of nuclear power plants. The young Japanese woman was scheduled to visit India to “participate in a series of events and meetings”, as mentioned in the invitation letter from Greenpeace. The Indian embassy in Tokyo gave her a business visa on February 15 but cancelled it on March 2, claiming her application “did not match with the stated purpose of the proposed visit”. While it is unlikely that a survivor of a nuclear scare, and one invited by Greenpeace, would sing hosannas at the altar of nuclear energy, many were still shocked by the government’s decision to ban her entry. Some have linked the decision to revoke her visa with the controversy that was unleashed by the PM’s comments on NGO’s diverting foreign aid to fund their protests made in an interview to Science in late February.

Here is what Kobayashi wanted to tell Indians and what the government didn’t let her say. Excerpts from an email interview:

Many, especially those who support nuclear energy, claim that Fukushima was not really a disaster, more so because there was no death caused due to radiation. Why do you think, if at all, Fukushima was a disaster?

Because of the Fukushima disaster many people had to move from their homes. If radiation is safe, why did we have to move? Radiation is invisible and causes long-term problems. You can’t see it, a few people stayed back because of it. This is bad.

Tell us a little about what you experienced a year ago and how you have adapted to cope with challenges posed thereafter, especially in terms of adapting to radiation leaks and other problems that were caused indirectly by it.

We learned that the reactor had melted two months before the official announcement was made. So, there was nothing surprising as we knew about it much earlier. Right after the accident, I was evacuated for about a week. I returned in July last year. I now live in Yonezawa city in Yamagata prefecture, one that borders the Fukushima prefecture. Excluding the time I have been out of Fukushima, I've lived there for nearly 20 years and that made it difficult to move. My younger brother is still living alone in Fukushima. Other than my younger brother, everyone has left Fukushima.

Our life changed after the Fukushima disaster. Human relations have been affected, people are very insecure, stressed and mentally affected. Among friends, we do not like to mention about this disaster again and again as it depresses us. However, we cannot see or smell the radiation but we feel that our whole environment has become dirty. We cannot touch plants, leaves, etc. My personal life has been affected. I have shifted to a government provided accommodation in Yonezawa city located in Yamagata prefecture and have lost touch with my friends.

Why did you choose to come to India and what is it that you wanted to share with Indians, especially those at Koodankulam?

The message I would like to give to people of India is that accidents in reactors can happen anytime. Even before this Fukushima disaster, accidents have happened. There is tremendous loss of life and people suffer a lot and it takes many years to reverse conditions. There needs to be a lot of studying and research on it and awareness needs to be created. There are many things that you cannot understand, that you will not feel unless you were living in Fukushima, and that’s what I wanted to talk about. Once there is an accident at a nuclear power plant, there is a risk, not just from the radiation, but also from the suffering due to displacement as well as one’s financial condition. All these risks together take a toll on one’s family, human life as well as economy of a family as well as the country. In our country, economy was given the priority over human life. This is what I wanted to say [to the Indian people].

How do you react to the Indian government's cancellation of your visa?

On the 15th of February my business visa was issued, but on the 2nd of March the Indian embassy called me and said my visa was not valid and asked me to not to travel to India. I really regret the denial of my visa by the Indian government. I felt that the Indian government does not want me to participate.

Why do you think it was cancelled?

Our government in Japan also tries to make it look like nothing happened at Fukushima. I personally feel that the Japanese government and the media made the issue and problem of Fukushima disaster very small as if it were no big issue. People in Japan in the past too have opposed the setting up of nuclear reactors on their land. But they were suppressed with money [bribe]. So, I personally feel that people of India are doing the right thing by opposing the government. It is but obvious. In fact, in Japan also if a new reactor is made then the entire Japanese population would oppose.

Will you apply to come here again?

Yes, I would like to. But I don’t know if Indian government wants me to come.
 
fukushima lik incidents happen once in 25 yrs. so should we ban nuclear energy just bcoz of 1 incident?
 
fukushima lik incidents happen once in 25 yrs. so should we ban nuclear energy just bcoz of 1 incident?

It's not about frequency.

It's about seeking an answer to India's energy problems.

I acknowledge the concerns of these protesters and so does the GoI (only acknowledge, not appreciate).

However there's one simple thing that these naysayers have always shied answering from.

DO THEY HAVE A SOLUTION FOR INDIA'S ENERGY CRISIS?

IS THERE ANY OTHER FORM OF ENERGY THAT CAN SATIATE THE HUNGER FOR GROWTH OF 1.2 BILLION PEOPLE?

THEY PROTEST ABOUT A PROBLEM BUT CAN THEY OFFER A SOLUTION?


As long as the answer to these questions is in the negative, there's no point listening to them.

It's very easy to protest. Anybody can protest in a democracy. However, it's very difficult to offer solutions.
 
FUKUSHIMA was quite old and it even didnt meet with the present safety norms but our one's are quite advanced and safe.

so its good to drop these activist out of country.They will create more problems.
 
you know its quite hilarious you have protesters claiming the gov't is not doing enough to help its poor and when the gov't takes action to help the poor other protesters come and say we are hurting the environment

nuclear power is safe (when you have skilled plant workers and sufficient safety precautions in place) you have to realize that Chernobyl was caused by a experiment gone completely wrong and fukushima by a earthquake/tsunami this means we need to put extra safety measures in place if we place nuclear plants near coastal regions. but for gods sakes make the lives of our people living in dastardly conditions at least decent enough to survive and progress in society.
 
Not only the Govt but also the common Tamil doesnt want him coming here, stirring sh!t and make us live in 6 hrs of power cut.

Ariigatou, but no Arigatou.
 
It's not about frequency.

It's about seeking an answer to India's energy problems.

I acknowledge the concerns of these protesters and so does the GoI (only acknowledge, not appreciate).

However there's one simple thing that these naysayers have always shied answering from.

DO THEY HAVE A SOLUTION FOR INDIA'S ENERGY CRISIS?

IS THERE ANY OTHER FORM OF ENERGY THAT CAN SATIATE THE HUNGER FOR GROWTH OF 1.2 BILLION PEOPLE?

THEY PROTEST ABOUT A PROBLEM BUT CAN THEY OFFER A SOLUTION?


As long as the answer to these questions is in the negative, there's no point listening to them.

It's very easy to protest. Anybody can protest in a democracy. However, it's very difficult to offer solutions.



Why cant India do it in a safer manner without more precautions and emergency procedures in place

I realized one thing, some Indian posters on this thread are truly dumb.
 
I am opposed to nuclear power. Why not adopt a system like Kerala ? Solar power plants in independent homes supplementing the state power grid ? At least that's what they are planning to implement. Something like that on a national scale would be even more awesome.
 
Why cant India do it in a safer manner without more precautions and emergency procedures in place

I realized one thing, some Indian posters on this thread are truly dumb.

Ok what are "more precautions" and "emergency procedures" that the activists have suggested ?

Do they have a viable alternative ?


I am opposed to nuclear power. Why not adopt a system like Kerala ? Solar power plants in independent homes supplementing the state power grid ? At least that's what they are planning to implement. Something like that on a national scale would be even more awesome.

Kerala also would be having powercuts if power doesnt come from Tamil Nadu...

And all those going gaga over renewable forms of energy,please understand we dont have the resources to implement them on large scale as to completely replace nuclear power.

There is no other alternative other than generating nuclear power. None whatsoever.
 
I am opposed to nuclear power. Why not adopt a system like Kerala ? Solar power plants in independent homes supplementing the state power grid ? At least that's what they are planning to implement. Something like that on a national scale would be even more awesome.

For that, first of all, your people need to have homes.

...for that they need money.

...for that they need jobs.

...for that they need industry.

...for that you need electricity.

...for that you need power plants.

Green tech.

Please don't come up with fancy phrases out of thin air.

Do some research and find out how feasible is this green tech for a poor country of 1.2 billion hungry and naked people who do not have enough to wear and eat.
 
For that, first of all, your people need to have homes.

...for that they need money.

...for that they need jobs.

...for that they need industry.

...for that you need electricity.

...for that you need power plants.

If they can do it in kerala....(a smaller state with even smaller revenue ); why not in tamil nadu ?! We have more resources, bigger infrastructure and a huge workforce.
 
Back
Top Bottom