Admal Keyani
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2008
- Messages
- 115
- Reaction score
- 0
The current Pope is not a Dictator because he has not ordered the killing's of innocent people. He may have considerable power in the Chruch, but he has not openly decreed to isolate a particular group in effect abusing his power. While the Dalai Lama has decreed that those who practise the Dorje Shugden should be isolated and there names taken down so that obviously they can be harrassed. Again my friend you have not answered what is your opinion of him targeting those who practise Dorje Shugden.
He is a religious Dictator because in Buddhism one must be peaceful in this case the Dalai Lama does not fit this Catergory as his followers are violent. He is an innovator and contradicts his own religion and decrees practises which he deems right, that my friend is abusing his power which in effect makes him a Dictator. Plus no one can question him and those who do are labelled as Chinese spies. This just shows that he is a religious Dictator no restrictions in keeping him on line.
The guy has critizised the teachings of past Dalai Lama's in effect breaking not only tradition which has been in use for 350 years, but also teachings of Buddhism. The fame got to his head when he was getting support from the international community. How can he be a monk when The CIA were supporting him in the past and were funding terrorists with money and weapons. Does that sound to you a peaceful monk, who is looking ways in promoting violence.
The Dalai Lama is not the head Buddhism. His spiritual authority supecedes the actual heads of the lineages of Tibetan Buddhism only because he imposes his will on others. If people disagree with him, they are crushed. There are many people who have been killed because they disagreed with the Dalai Lama. There are also many Tibetans who do not recognise his imposed authority. His actions are those of a religious dictator, not a compassionate and wise Buddhist leader.
He is a religious Dictator because in Buddhism one must be peaceful in this case the Dalai Lama does not fit this Catergory as his followers are violent. He is an innovator and contradicts his own religion and decrees practises which he deems right, that my friend is abusing his power which in effect makes him a Dictator. Plus no one can question him and those who do are labelled as Chinese spies. This just shows that he is a religious Dictator no restrictions in keeping him on line.
The guy has critizised the teachings of past Dalai Lama's in effect breaking not only tradition which has been in use for 350 years, but also teachings of Buddhism. The fame got to his head when he was getting support from the international community. How can he be a monk when The CIA were supporting him in the past and were funding terrorists with money and weapons. Does that sound to you a peaceful monk, who is looking ways in promoting violence.
The Dalai Lama is not the head Buddhism. His spiritual authority supecedes the actual heads of the lineages of Tibetan Buddhism only because he imposes his will on others. If people disagree with him, they are crushed. There are many people who have been killed because they disagreed with the Dalai Lama. There are also many Tibetans who do not recognise his imposed authority. His actions are those of a religious dictator, not a compassionate and wise Buddhist leader.