What's new

Indian forces kill 3 more Kashmiris as fresh protests erupt

. . .
How is Kashmir your land?




You mean British were right to kill Bhagat Singh?


You don't even know what bhagat Singh stand for

British was cononials

India is democracy
India constitutionally acquire J&K unlike Pakistan who used military force

Pakistani is military state

See the deference
 
.
Then security have options to kill them in process
Then the whole point of this thread is irrelevant

UN charter say there no way one can justify use of violence in the name of freedom or other things

Get your self education first

Dude seriously I need a joint after that endless circle with @Paksanity, the dude is exhausting, don't bother man! he is just a sophisticated troll at best!
 
. . . .
Do you endorse that resolution?



British considered themselves democracy and rightful rulers. Does it make them rightful rulers?

British consider India as vasal state there was no self rule local leaders who are imprisoned various times

Unlike Kashmir has Kashmiri CM

Muftis
Abdullah's
 
. .
Don't you think people being killed in Kashmir deserve better than trolling? Perhaps a serious thought how to stop it?

Do you think your uselessness unsubstantiated claims has better grounds

Talk on facts not rhetorics
 
.
British consider India as vasal state there was no self rule local leaders who are imprisoned various times

Unlike Kashmir has Kashmiri CM

Muftis
Abdullah's


British held the elections as well during Raj. It's the people of the land who should decide. In this case, Kashmir.

Do you think your uselessness unsubstantiated claims has better grounds

Talk on facts not rhetorics

Killing of people in Kashmir does not look like a fact to you?
 
.
Do you endorse that resolution?

Yes we do.....read this carefully.....

United Nations Security Council Resolution 47

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite Pakistan withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order. The Commission was also to send as many observers into the region as it deemed necessary to ensure the provisions of the resolution were enacted. Pakistan ignored the UN mandate, did not withdraw its troops and claimed the withdrawal of Indian forces was a prerequisite as per this resolution. Indian claim is that Subsequently Pakistan refused to implement the plebiscite until India accedes to it and continued holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control.
 
.
Yes we do.....read this carefully.....

United Nations Security Council Resolution 47

The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite Pakistan withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order. The Commission was also to send as many observers into the region as it deemed necessary to ensure the provisions of the resolution were enacted. Pakistan ignored the UN mandate, did not withdraw its troops and claimed the withdrawal of Indian forces was a prerequisite as per this resolution. Indian claim is that Subsequently Pakistan refused to implement the plebiscite until India accedes to it and continued holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control.


So you are ready for plebiscite on this condition?
 
.
British held the elections as well during Raj. It's the people of the land who should decide. In this case, Kashmir.

British abolished them many times

There was now self rule do you know what is Swaraj movement

And Bhagat Singh never killed fellow country men unlike buhran wani who killed Kashmiri policemens
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom