Logic note
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2007
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 0
Indian Hotels demands apology from Orient Express
2007-12-20 09:19:10 Source : CNBC-TV18
Indian Hotels wants an apology from Orient Express. The search for a global alliance has been reduced to a war of words between the two companies and their managements. CNBC-TV18’s Menaka Doshi reports on the latest round of fighting!
A few months ago Indian hotels bought a 10% stake in Orient Express and asked for an alliance, they were turned down by the Orient Express management. The Tata company bought another 1.5% and asked for an alliance again - this time they were rejected rudely.
Orient Hotels in an open letter said many things, but this one line may have hurt the most. Menaka Doshi quotes the letter sent by Orient Hotels - "We believe any association of our luxury brands and properties with your brands and properties would result in a reduction in the value of our brands and business."
According to Menaka, Indian Hotels found the letter to be pejorative, inaccurate and libelous.
Now Indian Hotels is asking for an apology for what it considers a 'pejorative, inaccurate and libelous' letter that Orient Hotels also issued as a press release, though it was meant to be confidential.
Here's the point-by-point rebuttal by the Taj chain to the issues raised by Orient Express -
* Taj Hotels insists it never suggested a merger. It does not need Orient's help to improve the performance of its non-Indian properties.
* That in fact, Orient has gaps in its network in New York and London that could have been filled by Taj.
* That, the association would not reduce the value of Orient's properties, because Taj enjoys a higher room occupancy rate compared to Orient and that it's trailing EBIDTA margin is 15% more than that of Orient's.
* That, contrary to Orient's allegation Taj does not re-brand all acquired hotels as 'Taj'.
Taj believes Orient Hotels has not met it's shareholders needs, nor does it respect the basic tenets of corporate governance as it has refused to enter into any meaningful dialogue on an alliance with Taj.
Indian Hotels says many Orient shareholders have made advances to meet, but the company has honourably declined them. Now Taj wants an apology from Orient Express.
But here's the killer line at the end of the letter, she says - and it goes - "We believe that those with a fossilized frame of mind risk being marginalised"!
2007-12-20 09:19:10 Source : CNBC-TV18
Indian Hotels wants an apology from Orient Express. The search for a global alliance has been reduced to a war of words between the two companies and their managements. CNBC-TV18’s Menaka Doshi reports on the latest round of fighting!
A few months ago Indian hotels bought a 10% stake in Orient Express and asked for an alliance, they were turned down by the Orient Express management. The Tata company bought another 1.5% and asked for an alliance again - this time they were rejected rudely.
Orient Hotels in an open letter said many things, but this one line may have hurt the most. Menaka Doshi quotes the letter sent by Orient Hotels - "We believe any association of our luxury brands and properties with your brands and properties would result in a reduction in the value of our brands and business."
According to Menaka, Indian Hotels found the letter to be pejorative, inaccurate and libelous.
Now Indian Hotels is asking for an apology for what it considers a 'pejorative, inaccurate and libelous' letter that Orient Hotels also issued as a press release, though it was meant to be confidential.
Here's the point-by-point rebuttal by the Taj chain to the issues raised by Orient Express -
* Taj Hotels insists it never suggested a merger. It does not need Orient's help to improve the performance of its non-Indian properties.
* That in fact, Orient has gaps in its network in New York and London that could have been filled by Taj.
* That, the association would not reduce the value of Orient's properties, because Taj enjoys a higher room occupancy rate compared to Orient and that it's trailing EBIDTA margin is 15% more than that of Orient's.
* That, contrary to Orient's allegation Taj does not re-brand all acquired hotels as 'Taj'.
Taj believes Orient Hotels has not met it's shareholders needs, nor does it respect the basic tenets of corporate governance as it has refused to enter into any meaningful dialogue on an alliance with Taj.
Indian Hotels says many Orient shareholders have made advances to meet, but the company has honourably declined them. Now Taj wants an apology from Orient Express.
But here's the killer line at the end of the letter, she says - and it goes - "We believe that those with a fossilized frame of mind risk being marginalised"!