What's new

Indian double standard on Kashmir issue. From Kashmir to Junagarh

Man if I had made that last statement there would be a flood of fury directed my way from the feminist brigade here. :cheers:

If the water is coming from my house, it is my water. For me to share.

We have mango trees growing in our compound, whose canopies overgrow into the neighbours garden. Their kids can break the mangos on their side. But the tree - and the fruit that grow on it, are ours.

As good neighbors we do not bother.

The day the kids (now men) start coming into our compound claiming the tree to be theirs, will be the day my family will put status and civility and decency to the side and go Mongol on them.

We have not yet gone Mongol on you brother. Don't please force our hand. We are blood brothers. No less.

go and stop Indus if you can and your top brass knows very well what will be the consequences.
 
Its quite simple, the water is coming from your house and I have little trust in your claims of humanity. I only care for the part of your house that has the water and so I will continue to wave my latthi and you yours until one of us or both of us kill each other.

Any of these humanity ideas are as laughable as the concept of virginity when trying to rise up from a small town girl to a big movie star.

.

Don't end up being like the Mariner "water water everywhere, not a drop to drink" on a serious note this is an post facto attempt to repackage the issue in strategic terms having failed to elicite the desired international attention all this time. World is no longer receptive to communal divisions but a dire strategic imperative can justify Pakistans action specially if the bedrock is something as essential as water.

Good for India that the majority have not caught up with this in Pakistan and Islamic cause still remains at nameplate.
 
go and stop Indus if you can and your top brass knows very well what will be the consequences.

Please feel free to eat as many of our mangos you need, that grow over your side.

Nobody is stopping you, nobody has stopped you, nobody will.

But please do not try to come for the tree on ours.
 
Please feel free to eat as many of our mangos you need, that grow over your side.

Nobody is stopping you, nobody has stopped you, nobody will.

But please do not try to come for the tree on ours.

but portion of residents where this tree is always claim you the occupants.
 
Indian subcontinent is a Hindu land since ages. Muslims are outsider. The formula for division of India was taken by British without taking any referendum from people of Indian subcontinent if they want a partition. So partition has no legal basis. India has right to take back land of Pakistan and Bangladesh.
 
Please feel free to eat as many of our mangos you need, that grow over your side.

Nobody is stopping you, nobody has stopped you, nobody will.

But please do not try to come for the tree on ours.

Ido want to very clear your attitude in south east Asia making yourself conquered one day as this is hadith also as being muslim you must have to firm belief on this what you say don't you,
 
In matters of territory ; there are NO bloody sentiments ; only power and strength matters
That is the crux of all learning/lessons from our own history eventually leading to partition in modern times & this should be a guiding principle for country like India where leaders are pacifist & idealistic fools....
 
Indian subcontinent is a Hindu land since ages. Muslims are outsider. The formula for division of India was taken by British without taking any referendum from people of Indian subcontinent if they want a partition. So partition has no legal basis. India has right to take back land of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Okay sure.. But which land? How is India the inheritor of princely states which were annexed by British and comprises British india?

What makes modern day Bharat the heir of Kingdoms and territory which today form Pakistan?

You are a foreigner to us and our people .. The land belongs to us.. And our ancestors have lived on it for thousands of years..

The only thing you may claim is bangalulu or tamilnadu.. Where your kind lives.. Otherwise we have more right to occupy modern day India which was ruled by our ancestors for centuries..
 
Indian subcontinent is a Hindu land since ages. Muslims are outsider. The formula for division of India was taken by British without taking any referendum from people of Indian subcontinent if they want a partition. So partition has no legal basis. India has right to take back land of Pakistan and Bangladesh.


so as per your above post Britishers born in India and Muslims were outsiders
what about the american over red indian land.
very nonsense post again,
 
Okay sure.. But which land? How is India the inheritor of princely states which were annexed by British and comprises British india?

What makes modern day Bharat the heir of Kingdoms and territory which today form Pakistan?

You are a foreigner to us and our people .. The land belongs to us.. And our ancestors have lived on it for thousands of years..

The only thing you may claim is bangalulu or tamilnadu.. Where your kind lives.. Otherwise we have more right to occupy modern day India which was ruled by our ancestors for centuries..
Right legal solution by British in 1947 would have been to have a referendum in subcontinent with following option.

1. Whole subcontinent stays as one nation.
2. Partition on basis of princely states.

Given the political mood of that time the referendum vote would have resulted in a single nation.
 
Okay sure.. But which land? How is India the inheritor of princely states which were annexed by British and comprises British india?

What makes modern day Bharat the heir of Kingdoms and territory which today form Pakistan?

You are a foreigner to us and our people .. The land belongs to us.. And our ancestors have lived on it for thousands of years..

The only thing you may claim is bangalulu or tamilnadu.. Where your kind lives.. Otherwise we have more right to occupy modern day India which was ruled by our ancestors for centuries..
your ancestors kindly name them
 
What is Kalat? Pakistani double standard, no?

Bangali babu kalat was a princely state in the middle of Balochistan which was one of the last states to merge with Pakistan.. The merger was made by none other than the ruler of kalat and it was much later that his brother spread militancy and later asked for amnesty.. Even today the heirs of Khan of Kalat are pro Pakistan.. His great grandson being the legal heir.
 
so as per your above post Britishers born in India and Muslims were outsiders
what about the american over red indian land.
very nonsense post again,
not outsiders.

part of india but not with right to ask for seperate nation.
 
your ancestors kindly name them

I'm Baluch .. Do you want me to name princely states in modern day India ruled by Baluch?

Half of my family is Pashtun .. Do you want me to name the Pashtun rulers of india ? We ruled you more than any other people .. So applying your own logic we have more right to claim indian territory than anybody else.

Right legal solution by British in 1947 would have been to have a referendum in subcontinent with following option.

1. Whole subcontinent stays as one nation.
2. Partition on basis of princely states.

Given the political mood of that time the referendum vote would have resulted in a single nation.

Nope it wouldn't my boy.

Creation of Pakistan... Proved that wrong..
 
I'm Baluch .. Do you want me to name princely states in modern day India ruled by Baluch?

Half of my family is Pashtun .. Do you want me to name the Pashtun rulers of india ?
All were defeated by marathas before britishers came. so irrelevent to discussion.

Creation of Pakistan... Proved that wrong..

Creation of Pakistan was by an act passed in British parliament. it is illegal.
 
Back
Top Bottom