Yes, of course. Why would we back the taliban when a splinter group are fighting against us?
What proof do you have? I ask in the same manner, as when a Pakistani blames the BLA/TTP support on YOU, and you ask for proof.
Who? and what does that have to do with this attack?
It's a retort. For someone, just like above to ask, who controls Haqqani? Who controls, certain elements in the taliban?
Who controls those proxies which I mentioned, and why do you people only see this entire game as a one way street.
Very naive.
Show me a Taliban statement objecting to Indian presence.
Taliban in India “Warning” | The Diplomat
Bingo
Naive
Bingo again.
Their presence is no good as per Pakistan - so bingo a fourth time too.
Oh no my dear. Everything bad you blame about us in Afghanistan, we can do to you, but with much greater magnitude.
Arguably every bit of insurgency here you stand to gain from. Not just isolated incidents like this.
In fact, some very shockingly obvious events would include the attacks on Kamra and PNS Mehran.
In which an AWACS was destroyed, the militants seemed to after that SPECIFIC target, same goes for the P-3C.
And now don't try and bullshit me, we both know rag tag talibs can't tell their their C-130 from a house fly.
You and your proxies could, and they you could certainly stand to gain from it too. In fact, you were the ONLY people to stand to gain from it.
The moral ship has sailed, I'll be outright with you. All your presence is now fair game.
Even Pakistan offered help in training the ANA, so I don't see any difference, India is there on humanitarian grounds, it irks Pakistan - not the taliban.
lol... 'humanitarian'.
It would be uber naive of you, to think that Indian presence does not have Pakistan in mind and that it is all, charity work and civilian related.
Besides, have the taliban or the haqqani's even claimed this attack? - which they almost always do - with sometimes even video evidence.
Not yet as far as I know.
But since you brought that up. Be clear.
Since they haven't said anything. Was it not them? Or since they haven't said anything, has someone else done it? Or were they our proxies in the first place, to have said, claimed or done it, or not?